Even intubations are relatively easy, blade into vallecula, tube through cords...
Oh dear..."simple" and "easy" are not synonymous. I mean, I know how to throw a fastball - can I do it? Not to any effective end, at all. You want the pucker factor to go to 10? Have an unsecured airway. Remember "ABC" - Airway, Breathing, Circulation? First is "A". Without it, game over. Yogi Berra said "You see a lot just by looking". Ever looked yet and seen nothing? It's not easy all the time.
On my ER rotation, the hardest part for me was learning that the ER is not meant for finding the solution to 90% of problems. Most stuff was triage, "bandaid until PCP visit", dispo. Its a trauma center but typically major traumas go to the surgical service (and after seeing plenty of trauma on surgery in school, wasn't that interested in it). Managing most problems is something that happens in the outpatient setting.
What is emergency medicine? "The rapid recognition of sickness and health, and the resuscitation of the critically ill and injured." First prong is "rapid recognition of sickness and health", and the practical realization that most people seen in the ED are not "sick"
per se, or, alternately, life-threateningly ill.
There are FM trained ED boarded (grandfathered in) docs working as full time EDPs in our ER as well, and Greensboro isn't rural.
Nowadays you can't get ED boarded with FM...same training today, but the bureaucratic roadblock does exist.
The EM practice track closed in 1989. The requirement was 7000 hours and 60 months in the ED (with 24 of those months consecutively) to be able to sit for the board. 21 years ago + 5 years in the ED + 3 years FM residency (called FP then) + 4 years of med school + 4 years of college, and start at 18 years old: 55 y/o today. I would guess that not a lot of FM grads in the 80s abandoned office practice to work full time in the ED (or else the AAFP would have stepped in and - oh, wait, they did - help form an EM specialty board). Indeed, there are around 5000 EM boarded but not EM-residency trained docs left in the US. I am thinking that, for many EM docs (EM trained or not), getting into their 50s is the time to think about retirement.
As for the same training, it is similar, but not the same. There is a lot of overlap, but, still, not identical. The most glaring difference is half or more of the months of EM residency are set in the ED. Much of the time in the ED is learning the ropes - not the generalities of CHF or lacerations or cerebral bleeds, but the specifics of the optimal first-line management and how to dovetail these patients into the appropriate specialists, instead of managing those patients by themselves (past the acute stage). Another difference is no continuity clinic. Although there is some functional continuity in the ED due to "frequent fliers", that is not the intent.
Medicine is a family, with medicine and surgery being parents, a lot of cousins, but EM and FM are siblings. You may look a lot like your brother, or be a lot like your sister, but you are not them.
I don't want sibling rivalry. It is not good, and, hopefully, in the end, we realize we're very closely on the same team.