My home program strongly dislikes the Doximity rankings and encourages students to steer clear of it. Because of this and the fact that I was fortunate enough to have good advising, I had little use for Doximity. However, not everyone is as fortunate.
What is your opinion on the Doximity rankings, and do you feel like they have helped/harmed/made no difference in the quality and quantity of applicants that your program is getting?
Choosing a residency doesn't have to do with "prestige of the program" for many people. I ranked the current #1 NE program last on my list in favor of a bunch of community EM programs that I'm sure aren't anywhere to be found and cancelled interviews at tons of other "prestigious" programs because at that point in my life I wasn't looking to train in a University based setting. I was looking more for "fit" than I was prestige. You have to remember, no matter where you go, you will receive fairly standardized training at an ACGME program. There will be little differences, but for the most part, EM is EM. If research resources are important to you, then I'd definitely target research heavy places. If fellowships are important to you (all 5% of you out there in EM), then target places that traditionally place people in fellowships. If you want to work in a University setting, target University programs. If you only ever wanted to work out in the community or in a community EM residency, consider community EM programs. And in the end, don't worry no matter where you match as long as you match somewhere. You'll be trained well no matter what.
So I guess my point is, I don't think doximity adds a ton to how people pick residencies. For those that want prestige, then doximity is probably helpful. For those that don't care, then its not. The training will be the same no matter what. You'll notice that prestigious programs will have higher board pass rates than others, but if you let any program start matching people with step scores north of 260 for their entire class, they'd all have a 100% pass rate too. The best predictor on board pass rate is how people did on standardized tests before, not where they train, in my opinion. If you are a good test taker with board scores in the 270's, you could probably pass the EM board without ever doing residency.
In the end, people choose residencies (and places choose residents) for different reasons. Not everyone values a prestigious name, and not every place values top shelf board scores. A lot of the audition/match process is about finding a "fit" on both sides of the aisle. I don't think doximity helps in that. My program, being a community EM program, certainly is never going to be at the top of the doximity list, but I'll pit my residents clinically against any program out there. Students come and rotate at my institution almost completely on word of mouth. We aren't on VSAS. When 3rd years ask 4th years above them where to rotate, people that had a great experience here recommend us. That's just not something that is going to show up on a doximity rank list, but thats ok. Like I said, everyone values different things.