Atlas said:
There is "some" truth to that, but that's nothing to really worry about because MOST docs that go the IM/ER route usually...USUALLY board in one or the other and from what I understand...more times than not they choose to be boarded in EM (for paycheck reasons). Basically, most of the IM/ER trained ER docs out there did it that way because they couldn't get a regular EM residency spot. This is NOT a good reason to pursue IM/ER in my opinion.
First of all, know that this is not an unbiased answer, as I am IM/EM...
1. I know of no graduate who is not double-boarded. Those who chose to pursue both specialties at the programs I am familiar with have become board certified in both fields.
2. It is not true that IM/EM residents choose to do so as a backup. Again, I know of nobody for whom this is true, and all in our program chose to become IM/EM, and had a BACKUP as either IM or EM.
3. It is not true that IM/EM folks are poorly trained in both fields. In fact, some may argue that they are better trained in both fields. It is a five year residency, and the first 1.5 years, we certainly DO feel a bit remedial, because our colleagues have advanced their knowledge in one field, and we are a bit behind both our IM and our EM colleagues. However, this evens out, and eventually, it seems that the upper-level IM/EM folks are looked to for answers and leadership.
Of course, this IS a biased answer, but my experience really is that IM/EM is a self-selected crew. There are only 18 or so allopathic spots out there, and many more are interviewing. However, several of those those who apply IM/EM as 1) backup or 2) undecided between IM and EM. When we see these applicants, they are immediately sniffed out and the program becomes disinterested.
IM/EM is NOT a good choice for the undecided, because one really needs a committment to BOTH specialites, and you will get burned out unless you absolutely enjoy both fields.
Any other questions, feel free to ask... (but you'll get my bias!)