EMT or ER Scribe?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

T12

Full Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
I'm wrapping up my sophomore year and I have the opportunity to take on an additional job. EMT would require training during the summer, but would be a much better experience in my eyes (plus it pays better)

Scribing however, requires nothing but an application and a friendly smile.

AS far as I can tell, they would both afford valuable experiences, but which have you good people found to be the most beneficial? (That's beneficial in all respects: superficially rewarding on applications, personally rewarding, schedule intensive, and monetarily rewarding)

I'm also taking the MCAT in july, so there's that to think about.

Members don't see this ad.
 
I'm wrapping up my sophomore year and I have the opportunity to take on an additional job. EMT would require training during the summer, but would be a much better experience in my eyes (plus it pays better)

Scribing however, requires nothing but an application and a friendly smile.

AS far as I can tell, they would both afford valuable experiences, but which have you good people found to be the most beneficial? (That's beneficial in all respects: superficially rewarding on applications, personally rewarding, schedule intensive, and monetarily rewarding)

I'm also taking the MCAT in july, so there's that to think about.

EMT way more valuable experience. There's really no substitute for contact with patients.

That said, EMTs don't really get paid well, if at all. But it's still worth it.
 
As an EMT-B, you will be transporting patients most likely, or, if you are lucky, paired up with a paramedic running 911 calls.

EMT + patients = patient contact experience
EMT + paramedic + patients = patient contact experience

However as an ER scribe you will see physicians!

you + Doc + patient = best type of clinical experience

It would be better to do something where you get to see what doctors do.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Rather, no substitute for the treatment of patients, right?

I'm also a transporter and currently have a LOT of physical patient contact, but that's essentially where it stops. Leaning towards EMT because scribing doesn't really seem all that useful outside of having it on a resume. I speak to/care for/touch patients way more as a transporter than the scribes I know.

But then again, they work with doctors more....but only ER docs...oh to hell with it all, I'll just go back to working for the Highway Department, that pays better than all of them!🙂
 
As an EMT-B, you will be transporting patients most likely, or, if you are lucky, paired up with a paramedic running 911 calls.

EMT + patients = patient contact experience
EMT + paramedic + patients = patient contact experience

However as an ER scribe you will see physicians!

you + Doc + patient = best type of clinical experience

It would be better to do something where you get to see what doctors do.

In that case, wouldn't shadowing be a sufficient alternative to scribing....oh the decisions...
 
Rather, no substitute for the treatment of patients, right?

I'm also a transporter and currently have a LOT of physical patient contact, but that's essentially where it stops. Leaning towards EMT because scribing doesn't really seem all that useful outside of having it on a resume. I speak to/care for/touch patients way more as a transporter than the scribes I know.

But then again, they work with doctors more....but only ER docs...oh to hell with it all, I'll just go back to working for the Highway Department, that pays better than all of them!🙂

Yes. I did a lot of shadowing before being an EMT. The difference between standing around watching and actually being accountable for assessing and treating a patient is huge. Still you should do some shadowing also.
 
So I hate my job - I'm a transporter - and I can't get hired as an EMT in a hospital setting or with a reasonably good ambulance company because I lack experience and I'm since I'm hopefully going to med-school in August I can't make a long term commitment - or so I've been told. I include this because I am 100% aware that I am unable to answer this question objectively.

Anyway, I felt really disappointed with my EMT-B training; I felt like the curriculum was ridiculously simple and superficial. I felt a definite resistance from my teacher and classmates when I asked about physiology or tried to actually understand the procedures and protocols and why they had been developed. I get why that is- on a bus you often don't have time to think so conditioning appropriate proven responses is functional and reasonable. In the ER I think the EMTs get a ton of experience with patients but like you said, so do transports. I think for those of us who are going the med school route, scribing is great practice.

Essentially you are shadowing and so you get the chance to ask questions and really see the physician's role in patient care. I just feel that while the EMT is an essential part of patient care, a lot of what you would get out of working as an EMT you get as a transporter. I mean I often spend more time with patients than nurses, EMTs, and Docs. I clean butts and listen to the extended histories. The things I don't do I probably won't do if I should become a physician anyway, I can't think of the last time I saw a doc start an IV or clean a wound.

So scribe. If you don't like it, go get your EMT. It's the easiest thing ever - BSI, scene safe...
 
I'm wrapping up my sophomore year and I have the opportunity to take on an additional job. EMT would require training during the summer, but would be a much better experience in my eyes (plus it pays better)

Scribing however, requires nothing but an application and a friendly smile.

AS far as I can tell, they would both afford valuable experiences, but which have you good people found to be the most beneficial? (That's beneficial in all respects: superficially rewarding on applications, personally rewarding, schedule intensive, and monetarily rewarding)

I'm also taking the MCAT in july, so there's that to think about.

Some medical schools require Standard First Aid as part of admission requirement. Doing your EMT would look good and get that out of the way.
 
Go get EMT training and work in the ER as a tech.

got me my acceptances 🙂

...among other things too i'm sure
 
Yeah, EMT is wonderful for gaining experience. My only suggestion would be to make sure you get reciprocity at home or try to work at a local ambulance company off-campus. I take shifts on my college campus squad and 90% of the calls are drunk escorts 🙁
 
Another vote for EMT. I'm currently a paramedic student who became an EMT-B last summer. I worked for a bit as an ER tech and well, anyone can do the work of a scribe. One of the ER docs where I worked who is ALSO on the admissions to the local med school told me hands down EMT experience is great and really looks great on your application. If I don't get in my first attempt, which is a possibility for anyone, then I will have an awesome job working as a medic making around 50k starting (while I continue to fix any deficiencies on my application) out and getting the best kind of clinical experience you can as a premed (running a code, administering drugs, intubations etc). Ultimately, it's your life so whatever fits for you in terms of schedule desire etc. I definitely want to go in to EM so this is my first step on the journey of a thousand miles. Good luck to you!
 
This thread is misleading and ill be happy to explain why.

EMT - You really get no useful clinical experience, little to no actual medicine. You have very little to no interaction with doctors (unless you stick around after you deliver patients, which happens sometimes). Your decision making process is much different from doctors and this is a pretty common occurrence on apps. You end up having to re-learn lots of stuff.

ED Tech - You get to do more doctor related patient care. You get significantly more interaction with doctors and learn more medicine. You still have an odd decision making process which involves little medicine but you can go out of your way to learn almost anything.

Scribe - Your involved in patient care (to different extents). You learn loads of medicine as you have to document it as you go. Ability to interact with doctors one on one, ask questions and learn. You have the chance to do, see and learn things you cant do as an EMT or Tech (tech is close). You learn about medications, prescriptions and clinical decision making, history taking etc. Good for letters of recommendation. Less common then the above two.

Do I need to go on? EMT is by far the worst of the three if your interested in being a doctor. Then ED Tech and then Scribe being the best if your going for a MD. If you wanted to be a PA I would go with Tech/Scribe. I cant recommend EMT for anyone really..its just not oriented to medicine.

I just want to be absolutely explicit. I'm not ragging on EMT's they are a necessary part of our healthcare system. However they are more oriented to First Aid then medicine. Purely for the experience it is worth it (just to do it). However there are more relevant clinical experiences that are much better geared to future physicians.

The pluses of Tech/Scribe experience extend to observed happiness/pitfalls of being a doctor, to me, this is the most valuable part of the experience.
 
Be a scribe! Trust me. Most valuable experience ever. You get first hand experience with procedures the ER physicians do and more importantly, you get real insight into the decision making process. Docs will share with you their differential diagnosis, why they are ordering this test or that. Depending on how cool your doc is you end up becoming a bit of a third year med student and they teach you all sorts of cool stuff like how to read X-Rays, EKGs, interpret test results, etc. The downside (very minor) is that some med schools will understand the value of scribing while some will chalk it up to shadowing. Scribing is a lot more than shadowing.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I had a year off and I'm taking EMT-B courses. I have to say, I wouldn't trade this experience for the world. I have been exposed to so many different areas of medicine because of it. Yeah, the way we approach situations would be different then a doctor, but it only adds to your breadth of knowledge and experience. Medschools love to see how many DIFFERENT types of experiences you've had. I also work in the ER directly with nurses and doctors. Yesterday I was assisting a doctor with a pelvic exam. The doctors pull me aside to show me things on x-rays.
 
EMT Training definately is good, and afterwards you can go work as an EMT or ER Tech depending on what you perfer (I perfer tech better). But you know, nothing makes you feel better and more confident in knowing that you know what to do (granted it's only basic life support) if someone around you suddenly had an accident or some acute episode. I have droven by car accidents and jumped out of my car to go provide care (since I was the first person on site before the firefighters came) and you have to experience the rush first hand of knowing what set of assessment and precautions to do and actually doing them for someone who just flew 10 feet from his motorcycle. Extremely rewarding and makes you feel like you are going to make a difference some day as a real doctor. But not only for strangers but I saved a friend's life who had an accute asthma attack after passing out from drinking. Talk about good materials for your personal statement!
 
This thread is misleading and ill be happy to explain why.

EMT - You really get no useful clinical experience, little to no actual medicine. You have very little to no interaction with doctors (unless you stick around after you deliver patients, which happens sometimes). Your decision making process is much different from doctors and this is a pretty common occurrence on apps. You end up having to re-learn lots of stuff.

ED Tech - You get to do more doctor related patient care. You get significantly more interaction with doctors and learn more medicine. You still have an odd decision making process which involves little medicine but you can go out of your way to learn almost anything.

Scribe - Your involved in patient care (to different extents). You learn loads of medicine as you have to document it as you go. Ability to interact with doctors one on one, ask questions and learn. You have the chance to do, see and learn things you cant do as an EMT or Tech (tech is close). You learn about medications, prescriptions and clinical decision making, history taking etc. Good for letters of recommendation. Less common then the above two.

Do I need to go on? EMT is by far the worst of the three if your interested in being a doctor. Then ED Tech and then Scribe being the best if your going for a MD. If you wanted to be a PA I would go with Tech/Scribe. I cant recommend EMT for anyone really..its just not oriented to medicine.

I just want to be absolutely explicit. I'm not ragging on EMT's they are a necessary part of our healthcare system. However they are more oriented to First Aid then medicine. Purely for the experience it is worth it (just to do it). However there are more relevant clinical experiences that are much better geared to future physicians.

The pluses of Tech/Scribe experience extend to observed happiness/pitfalls of being a doctor, to me, this is the most valuable part of the experience.

totally agreed, well said.
 
I don't agree at all... You go work in an ER as an EMT along side the ER doc and nurses as a code comes in lights and sirens Or following the doctor in the ER as he (or she) makes her rounds and tell me that you don't get worthwhile clinical experience. Sounds like you all don't know what your talking about.
 
Hello everyone!

I'm new to this site and am enjoying looking around. I graduated HS last year and am spending an interim year abroad. I start college this fall in western MA. The scribe programs sound very interesting and I would like to learn more. When not at college, I will likely be living in Philadelphia. I've done some searching and haven't been able to find any scribe progams in either location. I feel like I must be missing something, especially in Philly/Camden.

Do you know of any programs out there in these locations?

Thank you!
Sook
 
This thread is misleading and ill be happy to explain why.

EMT - You really get no useful clinical experience, little to no actual medicine. You have very little to no interaction with doctors (unless you stick around after you deliver patients, which happens sometimes). Your decision making process is much different from doctors and this is a pretty common occurrence on apps. You end up having to re-learn lots of stuff.

ED Tech - You get to do more doctor related patient care. You get significantly more interaction with doctors and learn more medicine. You still have an odd decision making process which involves little medicine but you can go out of your way to learn almost anything.

Scribe - Your involved in patient care (to different extents). You learn loads of medicine as you have to document it as you go. Ability to interact with doctors one on one, ask questions and learn. You have the chance to do, see and learn things you cant do as an EMT or Tech (tech is close). You learn about medications, prescriptions and clinical decision making, history taking etc. Good for letters of recommendation. Less common then the above two.

Do I need to go on? EMT is by far the worst of the three if your interested in being a doctor. Then ED Tech and then Scribe being the best if your going for a MD. If you wanted to be a PA I would go with Tech/Scribe. I cant recommend EMT for anyone really..its just not oriented to medicine.

I just want to be absolutely explicit. I'm not ragging on EMT's they are a necessary part of our healthcare system. However they are more oriented to First Aid then medicine. Purely for the experience it is worth it (just to do it). However there are more relevant clinical experiences that are much better geared to future physicians.

The pluses of Tech/Scribe experience extend to observed happiness/pitfalls of being a doctor, to me, this is the most valuable part of the experience.


There's really no other way than to answer this post other than it's complete folly! I am an EMT soon to be Paramedic, I've worked as an ER tech and I've seen scribes in action. You're COMPLETELY WRONG in more ways than one. I actually was at University Hospital today (level 1 here in San Antonio) and I showed your post to some of the ER docs 3 of whom are on the admissions committee with the local med school and ALL THREE looked at your post and laughed and then said do not follow this advice. Hmm, who to listen to veteran physicians working in the trenches who have been involved in admission for many years, or someone we know next to nothing about with no profile info available. To the op, ulitmately it's your decision but I would really suggest not to listen to this complete nonsense.

To novastorm, while I was at the ER today some paramedics (oops I mean first aid people according to you) who had just made a run and worked this lady for 45 minutes, who ended up making it and overheard the ER doc say, "that if it wasn't for the skills and "clinical training" these medics had that woman WOULD NOT HAVE MADE IT! I also showed them your post and they laughed when they read your "first aid" comment. Have a nice day, and "may you live interesting times."
 
There's really no other way than to answer this post other than it's complete folly! I am an EMT soon to be Paramedic, I've worked as an ER tech and I've seen scribes in action. You're COMPLETELY WRONG in more ways than one. I actually was at University Hospital today (level 1 here in San Antonio) and I showed your post to some of the ER docs 3 of whom are on the admissions committee with the local med school and ALL THREE looked at your post and laughed and then said do not follow this advice. Hmm, who to listen to veteran physicians working in the trenches who have been involved in admission for many years, or someone we know next to nothing about with no profile info available. To the op, ulitmately it's your decision but I would really suggest not to listen to this complete nonsense.

To novastorm, while I was at the ER today some paramedics (oops I mean first aid people according to you) who had just made a run and worked this lady for 45 minutes, who ended up making it and overheard the ER doc say, "that if it wasn't for the skills and "clinical training" these medics had that woman WOULD NOT HAVE MADE IT! I also showed them your post and they laughed when they read your "first aid" comment. Have a nice day, and "may you live interesting times."


I think this is quickly going to become a pissing match between people with these three types of jobs- with people with scribe experience saying that is better and people with EMT experience saying that is better. I think that this may say that either experience would be very enriching as both sets of people seem to advocate for their position and don't say things like "oh I did that and it sucked, do the other." I think it is also location dependent. Depending on hospital regulations and preferences of the ER docs you work with, you have more or less responsibility/privileges as a scribe. If my dad were having a heart attack and no docs around, I would certainly prefer a EMT in the room over a scribe! However, in as far as preparation towards medical school goes, I think a scribing position is excellent and is certainly nothing to be laughed at. Perhaps, the docs in San Antonio don't give their scribes a lot of responsibility. Where I am from, scribes act more or less as 3rd year medical students as explicitly described by the ER doctors, performing a lot of the same duties (although with a lot less of the same text book knowledge as 3rd year medical students). Scribes write histories, note physical exam findings, write orders (remind their docs when they have forgotten pertinent orders), track labs, notify doctors of important findings, assist with pelvic exams, lumbar punctures, joint reductions, etc, write discharge instructions and prescriptions. And although it just seems like its just a bunch of "writing" and clerical work, you need to know what's pertinent about a story of chest pain to write the history or what risk factors are important and why, etc to write a good history of chest pain, for example. Some scribes even write admissions orders and let the doc review them before they are submitted. That's at a "high level of functioning." Perhaps some scribes just sit on their butts all day and page answering services and fill in lab results. It really is the amount of responsibility you get from a doc that determines the quality of the experience when it comes to scribing.
 
I thought about it again. This is a message board and its not worth arguing about.

To the OP.

Do what you can make the most out of. If you can do lots of stuff as a scribe do scribe. If you like hands on be an EMT. If you want to shoot the difference go ED Tech. The advantage of being a Tech/Scribe is that you are in the ER all the time and you can really make the most out of that time. Just do what works best for you.

Also to the op a more friendly non curse related chinese proverb "A book holds a house of gold." In the end thats all that matters.
 
I can't speak for EMTs as I'ver never been one and I don't know the difference between what EMT-Bs and EMTs are or what all that entails. I do know that a EMT is not even a tenth of a paramedic. Medics and prehospital care is a whole other world, a whole other specialty, and totally not part of this discussion. If you want to be paramedic, be a paramedic. If you want to be a doctor, don't waste the EMS instructors' times by thinking that being a paramedic will help you get into medical school. I know this wasn't the OP's question but I do know there are lurkers and other people reading this, frustrated by the whole premed process, and hoping for a foot in the door. Look, please don't think that you can do that by faking the paramedic process. It's disrespectful to those professionals.

What I can speak about is being a scribe. Please forgive any following spelling errors.

It's geography, hospital, legal, and physician-dependent, so not every body will have the same experience, but I've been fortunate enough to be part of an awesome scribe program. Nova and Footballfan have both touched on a lot of why it's a great concept, but from my own personal experience in one specific ED, I just want to elaborate on one take away: you learn what being an emergency physician is like and have the opportunity to get a better glimpse of what other specialties entail. Basically, while you don't lay hands, you learn to think like a doctor.

For example, as a scribe, the elements of a HPI are ingrained in my mind (quality, severity, location, timing, duration, context, modifying factors, and associated symptoms/signs). We document everything from history to ROS to physical exam to labs to rads to consults. When pts come into the ED, we can usually predict how their course will go given their chief complaint. Walk in 67 yo male comes in with substernal chest pain, radiating to the L neck and jaw, is diaphoretic and nauseous with a recent hx of dyspnea on exertion is getting EKG, troponin, CXR, maybe a CK-MB index, placed on cardiac monitor, oximetry, 2L O2, and other point of care labs. He'll probably get a nitro spray as well. Plan to rule out acute MI or other ACS. If they have to go to the cath lab, a scribe knows that s/he have to document the anticoags, Plavix, beta-blockers, asa, etc. There's obviously more to this, but I just wanted to show you an example. I also know why that same dude with a slightly different HPI might get a GI cocktail instead.

If you show enough initiative, you start to learn what the labs mean. Total bilirubin of 26? That's probably why the pt's glowing like a yellow highlight pen. That alcoholic hunched over with epigastric pain? Lipase 250. L temple tenderness? ESR of 80 confirms temporal arteritis. Heck, I'm starting to read CXRs and CTs. Hey doc, you know that pt with through and through CP we planned to start on a heparin drip? Well, isn't the mediastinum kinda wide on CXR? I love pulling up a CT of a chronic abd pain pt with h/o repeat prescription narcotic meds issues who is complaining of worst abd pain of life and recognizing the scan as showing the pt is FOS. Literally. If you're only a premed but a scribe, you would know what I'm talking about. I also understand the medical decision making. A 79 yo patient with only vague RLL atelectasis by film but has a WBC of 17,000, yellowish productive cough, and is febrile will likely be started on Avelox and admitted even though the CXR was not conclusive for pneumonia like infiltrate. Heck, I've even written a few preliminary MDMs for the physicians. Do I know what SOAP is? Heck yeah! And so do the scribes

And if you're fortunate enough to work in a large hospital with multiple EDPs, you get to observe different practice habits, picking out what you like and hope to do in the future, as well as appreciating what you do not want to do as a doctor. The docs I work with invite us into the doctor's lounge for food and coffee. They write our recc letters. They discuss various pathophysiology with us. We also get to interact with various specialists from neuro to onc to cards to hospitalists to rads. Some of the rads even trust us to relay stat CT findings to the docs without even waiting to tell them personally. Basically, I know how to act as a professional in the hospital.

Sure there are times I wish I had EMT training. I don't know what all the splints are. I'm not called on to help move a patient off the board. I don't do chest compressions. But a ED doc doesn't do chest compressions either. While the EMT gets to be part of the excitement during a code, sweating, and pushing away, I'm only charting the code. But guess what the ED doc is doing? Well, s/he's not drawing blood - that's the lab tech. S/He's not putting in IVs - that's the nurse. If the pt crumps, s/he's not doing compressions - that's the EMT (or the Lucas). S/he is sure as heck not putting in the Foley. No, the doc's running the code and if necessary, doing RSI or putting in a central line. And by documenting everything, you start to see the big picture. Did they push the succs and etomidate for RSI? ****, she's crumping: atropine, epi, and bicarb (not necessarily in that order)! I'm scared of status asthmaticus. I know what a GI bleed smells like. And I think only girls can smell DKA.

I'm not at a trauma center so those who are can elaborate more on it if they want.

I also know about billing BS and that to get paid level V, the chart needs at least 4 elements of the HPI, 10 systems in the ROS, 2 PSHx, 8 or more systems on the PExam.

And as a scribe, I can have as much close interaction with the pts as I want. Getting water, blankets, talking and chatting, teasing pt's children, commiserating. I can do all that and remember the compassion that is in my heart. I can even tackle pysch pt's if I want. But I don't have to wipe any butts. Nor do I have to grab commodes or bed pans. Why? Because I have another pt to see with the doctor.

I also love the humility. Everyday, I recognize that there is way too much to learn and I'm absolutely terrified to start medical school. But I excited as hell, too. And because I have this job, I have so much respect for the other professionals that work with the docs. The nurses, NPs, PAs, Medics, techs, and EMTs all play vital roles, without whom the hospital would not work. Don't ever forget that. And if I ever do want to know what all those splints are, I ask the EMT because I respect their knowledge base and what they do, and because I'm not better than them.

But honestly, I don't know if being a scribe is better on a resume than being an EMT. I have been fortunate to be admitted to a US allo medical school for fall 2008 and the physician (not EM) who interviewed me loved the idea. But I've heard that certain interviewers downplay the program although a friend who interviewed with an ED doctor had a blast talking about it. I know that some of the specialists in our hospital think highly of the program, the ED docs love having us around and love to teach us, and the rotating medical students and residents in our ED think we're gonna be so ahead of the curve, especially in year 2. The nurses teach us tricks on getting in good with other nurses (something of value when we're annoying medical students). And because they've told me, I know that all the premed EMTs (not the future paramedics) in our ED wish they had our jobs. Finally, one of the director of admissions in our states has come out and specifically recommended to applicants that they apply to any of the area scribe programs.

But I think that any clinical experience will be highly valued by admissions. Scribe, EMT, nursing aid, phlebotomist, volunteer, shadowing. Anything clinical with pt contact, so that we applicants know it's not all about trying to attain sainthood, will look good with admissions. And all and any of it, will be absolutely useless if the grades and MCAT scores suck. So scribe or EMT doesn't really matter. And of course, remember that what I write is specific to my own personal experience and different scribes may have had worse times. I just think that if you have the choice between being a scribe or EMT, go become a scribe.

So good luck to the OP and others who have read this. Whatever, you do, just do it well. I'm sure it will pay off in the end.

And if any EMT wants to show this posting to their ED docs and say that I'm FOS, go right ahead. I've said, extensively, my peace.
 
I can see that no matter what is said, certain individuals will always see it their way. I also didn't realize that I had to clarify that EMT simply means Emergency Medical Technician of which there are 3 levels. I think a couple of you who have issues with an EMT are grouping all EMT's in one category. I am an EMT-P (Paramedic) student who has to go through a rigorous training academy that lasts 12 months. I had hoped that some of you would have understood that EMT-P’s are much more than “first aid” folk. I think you assume all EMT’s are EMT-B (basics). Their skill set is minimal and I was doing way more as an EMT-B working in the ER as a Tech, versus working as an EMT-B on the box. As an EMT-P student I am learning skills that many med students don’t learn until 3rd year.

It was not my intention to start a pissing contest, or to see who has a better knowledge of Chinese proverbs, btw novastorm I liked your last one. Very appropriate.

I think many premeds that come into med school these days have a variety of skill sets and/or experience they bring with them to the table. This is especially true of us “non trads.” Ultimately, it’s all good. In the end we are all trying to place ourselves in a position that makes a difference and that helps people. I was simply agitated when the comment about people that ARE saving lives being equivocated with “first aid” folk.

I admire and look forward to becoming an EMT-P and feel that if I’m not successful in gaining admission I have an AWESOME job where I make a difference. If one feels that working as a Tech or scribe or whatever makes them happy and they feel like they are making a difference then that is all that matters.

The first time you see an EMT-P working a 7 y/o in front of her parents and hope and pray that your training has taught you what to do in order to save her life well; there are simply no words available. One day that might be your sister or daughter.

To novastorm and atelectasis, thank you for your feedback and I apologize if I ruffled any feathers. It was not my intention. I just wish that EMT-P's received more respect than they do. Okay, back to lurking and good luck to all on this journey of a thousand miles.
 
I can...thousand miles.

No bother I don't equate the word EMT with EMT-P (In my head at least). I put you all in a totally different category of Paramedics myself as the last poster said. Good luck, from your former posts you've been at this for a while, so keep it up.
 
No bother I don't equate the word EMT with EMT-P (In my head at least). I put you all in a totally different category of Paramedics myself as the last poster said. Good luck, from your former posts you've been at this for a while, so keep it up.

I appreciate that and once again apologize for any generalizations I made towards you and other scribes. It was not professional or appropriate.

" a refelction upon a pool of water does not reveal its depth; so too it is with men!"
 
Here's another view point from another thread (from a reapplicant that was successful this year):

-The biggest thing he told me was that the committee wanted me to have experience WORKING in a hospital environment, and EMS wasn't enough. I'd shadowed in a hospital (as we all have if we've applied), but he said that the committee was concerned I had a glorified view of being a physician from working EMS. Not true, but knowing the need to show them this so I quit my job with the UFA and went to work at a hospital. It worked nicely since I was moving with my fiancee anyway, so I considered it a fresh start. I worked first as a phlebotomist, then as an ER Tech. Don't ever work as a phlebotomist...
 
I have interviewed med school applicants who just lit up when asked to talk about being a scribe. (Atelectasis comes across the same way.) If this appeals to you, go for it.

I have interviewed far more applicants with EMT-B training. Many have not been able to find work, or find that the work is mundane (transporting nursing home paitents here & there or the minor things that come up on campus). A few have had very good experiences.
 
Wow, guys, didn't mean to start a storm, but I certainly appreciate all the responses, I find them all to be very helpful!

In my original post, I certainly didn't mean to imply that being a scribe is easy, only that it is easier to get the job, i.e. no pre-requisite training necessary as with EMTs.

Ironically enough, the day after posting this, a girl in my O-chem II class suggested the scribe program to me and said I could have the job within a week! Hoping to take her up on that.
 
To novastorm and atelectasis, thank you for your feedback and I apologize if I ruffled any feathers. It was not my intention. I just wish that EMT-P's received more respect than they do.

Agreed. When I first started as an EMT I asked the medics what they thought about me getting my Paramedic cert before going to med school and they looked at me like I had three heads. Their training is very rigorous especially compared to EMT. Medics make quick decisions about giving some really potent intravenous drugs, interpret EKGs, intubate, etc. They're arguably more capaoble of handling emergencies than doctors outside of the hospital.
 
Bump. Found it useful, I know it's old.

Haha good call on the bump... I think I'll try to sum this thread up, having some experience with both jobs, so you guys can avoid the above borderline flame war:

EMT = You do more, but it's less "doctor-like" because you have your own job and own set of responsibilities which are different from the Dr.'s.

Scribe = You're attached to the Dr. all day and can arguably learn more material pertinent to med school, but you're not saving lives, in a direct sense at least.

Both = Good experience. Done and done. How did people write so much about this again?
 
Haha good call on the bump... I think I'll try to sum this thread up, having some experience with both jobs, so you guys can avoid the above borderline flame war:

EMT = You do more, but it's less "doctor-like" because you have your own job and own set of responsibilities which are different from the Dr.'s.

Scribe = You're attached to the Dr. all day and can arguably learn more material pertinent to med school, but you're not saving lives, in a direct sense at least.

Both = Good experience. Done and done. How did people write so much about this again?

+1, done both, still doing EMS, but alas both have their own perks
 
This may be a dumb question, but how do you go about becoming a scribe?
 
stupid question, but is there a difference between an ER scribe and a data collector?
 
stupid question, but is there a difference between an ER scribe and a data collector?

Yes. A scribe works with the physician and records the patient's history, physical, record of treatment, pertinent lab/diagnostic results, disposition, etc (does all the documentation).

A data collector is just that, a data collector. This can be widely interpreted depending on what data is being collected, but they aren't tasked with recording the official patient care record.
 
EMT-B is useless, you are a glorified transporter/oxygen carrier. EMT-P is wayyyy more difficult (and just different) and can take a couple years.

I would go after scribe or hell even CNA for a more hospital like experience. With CNA you get way more chart review and patient contact than EMT. Scribes get more doctor contact.
 
Might as well give my .02

I received my EMT-B license over a month ago. I applied to numerous hospitals and ambulance companies. I've been working as an EMT for a private ambulance company for the last three weeks or so.

Where I work, we mostly do transports. Occasionally we'll get patients who've fallen or "don't feel good." There is another company in the area that has the EMT-B's run 9-1-1 calls. From what I've heard, they've seen some pretty severe cases. Long story short, being an EMT can be rewarding and can provide you with good experience depending on where you work.

Unfortunately, this economy is a piece of crap. Jobs are hard to come by. I would love to get a job as an ER tech. Unfortunately, that's easier said than done, so sometimes you just gotta take what you can get!
 
This may sound hard but if you can do it, both are very valuable in different ways. I heard though that if you scribe it can help prepare you for med school. Idk about EMT though even though you will get use to patient contact
 
EMT just sounds like a lot more fun, plus you get the exercise.
 
Very useful thread! I would love to be an ER Scribe in the ATL area. We'll see how my application goes.
 
I can't speak for EMTs as I'ver never been one and I don't know the difference between what EMT-Bs and EMTs are or what all that entails. I do know that a EMT is not even a tenth of a paramedic. Medics and prehospital care is a whole other world, a whole other specialty, and totally not part of this discussion. If you want to be paramedic, be a paramedic. If you want to be a doctor, don't waste the EMS instructors' times by thinking that being a paramedic will help you get into medical school. I know this wasn't the OP's question but I do know there are lurkers and other people reading this, frustrated by the whole premed process, and hoping for a foot in the door. Look, please don't think that you can do that by faking the paramedic process. It's disrespectful to those professionals.

What I can speak about is being a scribe. Please forgive any following spelling errors.

It's geography, hospital, legal, and physician-dependent, so not every body will have the same experience, but I've been fortunate enough to be part of an awesome scribe program. Nova and Footballfan have both touched on a lot of why it's a great concept, but from my own personal experience in one specific ED, I just want to elaborate on one take away: you learn what being an emergency physician is like and have the opportunity to get a better glimpse of what other specialties entail. Basically, while you don't lay hands, you learn to think like a doctor.

For example, as a scribe, the elements of a HPI are ingrained in my mind (quality, severity, location, timing, duration, context, modifying factors, and associated symptoms/signs). We document everything from history to ROS to physical exam to labs to rads to consults. When pts come into the ED, we can usually predict how their course will go given their chief complaint. Walk in 67 yo male comes in with substernal chest pain, radiating to the L neck and jaw, is diaphoretic and nauseous with a recent hx of dyspnea on exertion is getting EKG, troponin, CXR, maybe a CK-MB index, placed on cardiac monitor, oximetry, 2L O2, and other point of care labs. He'll probably get a nitro spray as well. Plan to rule out acute MI or other ACS. If they have to go to the cath lab, a scribe knows that s/he have to document the anticoags, Plavix, beta-blockers, asa, etc. There's obviously more to this, but I just wanted to show you an example. I also know why that same dude with a slightly different HPI might get a GI cocktail instead.

If you show enough initiative, you start to learn what the labs mean. Total bilirubin of 26? That's probably why the pt's glowing like a yellow highlight pen. That alcoholic hunched over with epigastric pain? Lipase 250. L temple tenderness? ESR of 80 confirms temporal arteritis. Heck, I'm starting to read CXRs and CTs. Hey doc, you know that pt with through and through CP we planned to start on a heparin drip? Well, isn't the mediastinum kinda wide on CXR? I love pulling up a CT of a chronic abd pain pt with h/o repeat prescription narcotic meds issues who is complaining of worst abd pain of life and recognizing the scan as showing the pt is FOS. Literally. If you're only a premed but a scribe, you would know what I'm talking about. I also understand the medical decision making. A 79 yo patient with only vague RLL atelectasis by film but has a WBC of 17,000, yellowish productive cough, and is febrile will likely be started on Avelox and admitted even though the CXR was not conclusive for pneumonia like infiltrate. Heck, I've even written a few preliminary MDMs for the physicians. Do I know what SOAP is? Heck yeah! And so do the scribes

And if you're fortunate enough to work in a large hospital with multiple EDPs, you get to observe different practice habits, picking out what you like and hope to do in the future, as well as appreciating what you do not want to do as a doctor. The docs I work with invite us into the doctor's lounge for food and coffee. They write our recc letters. They discuss various pathophysiology with us. We also get to interact with various specialists from neuro to onc to cards to hospitalists to rads. Some of the rads even trust us to relay stat CT findings to the docs without even waiting to tell them personally. Basically, I know how to act as a professional in the hospital.

Sure there are times I wish I had EMT training. I don't know what all the splints are. I'm not called on to help move a patient off the board. I don't do chest compressions. But a ED doc doesn't do chest compressions either. While the EMT gets to be part of the excitement during a code, sweating, and pushing away, I'm only charting the code. But guess what the ED doc is doing? Well, s/he's not drawing blood - that's the lab tech. S/He's not putting in IVs - that's the nurse. If the pt crumps, s/he's not doing compressions - that's the EMT (or the Lucas). S/he is sure as heck not putting in the Foley. No, the doc's running the code and if necessary, doing RSI or putting in a central line. And by documenting everything, you start to see the big picture. Did they push the succs and etomidate for RSI? ****, she's crumping: atropine, epi, and bicarb (not necessarily in that order)! I'm scared of status asthmaticus. I know what a GI bleed smells like. And I think only girls can smell DKA.

I'm not at a trauma center so those who are can elaborate more on it if they want.

I also know about billing BS and that to get paid level V, the chart needs at least 4 elements of the HPI, 10 systems in the ROS, 2 PSHx, 8 or more systems on the PExam.

And as a scribe, I can have as much close interaction with the pts as I want. Getting water, blankets, talking and chatting, teasing pt's children, commiserating. I can do all that and remember the compassion that is in my heart. I can even tackle pysch pt's if I want. But I don't have to wipe any butts. Nor do I have to grab commodes or bed pans. Why? Because I have another pt to see with the doctor.

I also love the humility. Everyday, I recognize that there is way too much to learn and I'm absolutely terrified to start medical school. But I excited as hell, too. And because I have this job, I have so much respect for the other professionals that work with the docs. The nurses, NPs, PAs, Medics, techs, and EMTs all play vital roles, without whom the hospital would not work. Don't ever forget that. And if I ever do want to know what all those splints are, I ask the EMT because I respect their knowledge base and what they do, and because I'm not better than them.

But honestly, I don't know if being a scribe is better on a resume than being an EMT. I have been fortunate to be admitted to a US allo medical school for fall 2008 and the physician (not EM) who interviewed me loved the idea. But I've heard that certain interviewers downplay the program although a friend who interviewed with an ED doctor had a blast talking about it. I know that some of the specialists in our hospital think highly of the program, the ED docs love having us around and love to teach us, and the rotating medical students and residents in our ED think we're gonna be so ahead of the curve, especially in year 2. The nurses teach us tricks on getting in good with other nurses (something of value when we're annoying medical students). And because they've told me, I know that all the premed EMTs (not the future paramedics) in our ED wish they had our jobs. Finally, one of the director of admissions in our states has come out and specifically recommended to applicants that they apply to any of the area scribe programs.

But I think that any clinical experience will be highly valued by admissions. Scribe, EMT, nursing aid, phlebotomist, volunteer, shadowing. Anything clinical with pt contact, so that we applicants know it's not all about trying to attain sainthood, will look good with admissions. And all and any of it, will be absolutely useless if the grades and MCAT scores suck. So scribe or EMT doesn't really matter. And of course, remember that what I write is specific to my own personal experience and different scribes may have had worse times. I just think that if you have the choice between being a scribe or EMT, go become a scribe.

So good luck to the OP and others who have read this. Whatever, you do, just do it well. I'm sure it will pay off in the end.

And if any EMT wants to show this posting to their ED docs and say that I'm FOS, go right ahead. I've said, extensively, my peace.


For all the scribes out there, this post is pure gold. I'm sure you all will agree.
 
For all the scribes out there, this post is pure gold. I'm sure you all will agree.

Agreed, I really love the job and the amount we get to learn. At my institution we get to write MDMs as well which is exciting and a great challenge, especially coming up with differentials as best we can (of course w assistance and review afterwards).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top