- Joined
- Dec 20, 2004
- Messages
- 110
- Reaction score
- 0
Since I've been reading this forum more and more lately (it really is not only educational for all levels I think but entertaining as well) I figured I'd start a post on something I've been thinking about since reading some of the choices people made in different topics on techniques--particularly epidurals.
Jet, I believe, has stated how he only does Combined Spinal-Epidurals now (CSE) while others have stated a few pros/cons to their individual techniques. What I'd like to do is devote a post strictly to epidurals and see what everyone has to say (coming off OB call I guess I have epidurals on my mind ).
Anyway, my particular preference is fairly straight forward. Reach epidural space, thread catheter, test dose and secure catheter. Initial bolus is usually 10 cc's 0.125% bupivicaine with 1ug/cc fentanyl plus an initial 50 ug of fentanyl (so a total of 11 cc's of which the patient may or may not get the entire 11 cc's in incremental dosages), start infusion, finish charting (gives me a few bp's to watch) then leave. I rarely have hypotension I need to treat, the lipid soluble fentanyl works quickly for the patient and the nurses rarely bug me for redoses.
Other techniques:
CSE with straight bupivicaine: Epidural space Identified, 120mm 24 or 27 ga sprotte (haven't really seen a difference in HA incidence with either and the 24 ga fits the 18ga Touhy almost perfect so that if you get CSF you are almost assuredly in the epidural space with your catheter). 1/2 cc 0.25% bupivicaine intrathecal, thread catheter and quickly test dose, secure and lay patient down). Disadvantage: Hypotension and untested catheter. Also, from a resident perspective, it is not uncommon for the spinal dose to wear off for a patient who is laboring for a long time and, while the epidural is functioning fine (excellent dermatomal distribution etc. etc.) the less-dense epidural analgesia isn't the same as the dense intrathecal analgesia, less sacral nerve root coverage and more calls for a "non-functioning" epidural late in labor.
CSE with narcotic only: Same technique as above but 25 ug of fentanyl intrathecally. Pros: Less hypotension, quick onset of analgesia without dense motor blockade, nice transition to epidural with infusion (i.e. start infusion after securing catheter and rarely need to bolus). Cons: Itching and while onset of analgesia is somewhat faster, 50 ug of fentanyl in epidural space works very quickly without having to use another needle. I know some folks use other, longer-acting narcotics, in the intrathecal space and it would be interesting to hear what people have to say.
My transition for technique preference was CSE w/local, CSE/narcotic, to now essentially epidural w or w/o narcotic (unless the patient is morbidly obese and loss of resistance is questionable--then the spinal needle can be very helpful).
Comments?
Jet, I believe, has stated how he only does Combined Spinal-Epidurals now (CSE) while others have stated a few pros/cons to their individual techniques. What I'd like to do is devote a post strictly to epidurals and see what everyone has to say (coming off OB call I guess I have epidurals on my mind ).
Anyway, my particular preference is fairly straight forward. Reach epidural space, thread catheter, test dose and secure catheter. Initial bolus is usually 10 cc's 0.125% bupivicaine with 1ug/cc fentanyl plus an initial 50 ug of fentanyl (so a total of 11 cc's of which the patient may or may not get the entire 11 cc's in incremental dosages), start infusion, finish charting (gives me a few bp's to watch) then leave. I rarely have hypotension I need to treat, the lipid soluble fentanyl works quickly for the patient and the nurses rarely bug me for redoses.
Other techniques:
CSE with straight bupivicaine: Epidural space Identified, 120mm 24 or 27 ga sprotte (haven't really seen a difference in HA incidence with either and the 24 ga fits the 18ga Touhy almost perfect so that if you get CSF you are almost assuredly in the epidural space with your catheter). 1/2 cc 0.25% bupivicaine intrathecal, thread catheter and quickly test dose, secure and lay patient down). Disadvantage: Hypotension and untested catheter. Also, from a resident perspective, it is not uncommon for the spinal dose to wear off for a patient who is laboring for a long time and, while the epidural is functioning fine (excellent dermatomal distribution etc. etc.) the less-dense epidural analgesia isn't the same as the dense intrathecal analgesia, less sacral nerve root coverage and more calls for a "non-functioning" epidural late in labor.
CSE with narcotic only: Same technique as above but 25 ug of fentanyl intrathecally. Pros: Less hypotension, quick onset of analgesia without dense motor blockade, nice transition to epidural with infusion (i.e. start infusion after securing catheter and rarely need to bolus). Cons: Itching and while onset of analgesia is somewhat faster, 50 ug of fentanyl in epidural space works very quickly without having to use another needle. I know some folks use other, longer-acting narcotics, in the intrathecal space and it would be interesting to hear what people have to say.
My transition for technique preference was CSE w/local, CSE/narcotic, to now essentially epidural w or w/o narcotic (unless the patient is morbidly obese and loss of resistance is questionable--then the spinal needle can be very helpful).
Comments?