>Yeah, that response was based solely on the controlled substance & pharmacy practice act for SCarolina. Writing scripts for one's self or writing CII-CV for immediate family members is a nono.
That makes complete sense.
>A physician self-treating is just as bad as anyone else self-medicating.
That's not true. The difference is that the MD has 7-10+ years of training learning how to do this. "Anyone else" saw a special on Oprah or the infomercial that coral calcium cures every disease know to man. There is a HUGE difference betweened the layperson and a trained professional self-medicating.
>The level of objectivity needed to rationally treat a patient is lost when self-treating or treating an immediate family member.
To an extent, you are correct. For this reasons, physicians will almost never treat a family member's serious medical condition. However, to say that an MD can't be objective when her son has a cold or she has the flu is, perhaps, a bit narrow minded.
>Thats not an attack on physicians... its an across-the-board concept in my mind.
Fair enough. It is somewhat foreign to me, as here I have seen countless doctors bring in all manner of scripts for themselves and their families. I simply couldn't imagine the fuss that would have been made had a pharmacist refused to fill a z-pack for the doctor or birth controll for his daughter or zyrtec for his wife (and on and on). To be honest, I wouldn't blame them. Physicians train at the MINIMUM for 7 years post college in a manner that few people can appreciate or even understand. To say that they have no right to treat themselves or those closest to them or that "A physician self-treating is just as bad as anyone else self-medicating" is, rightfully so, frustrating (to say the least).
Jason