- Joined
- Mar 7, 2013
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm not sure if this is a widespread issue but recently, I'm getting A LOT more oral prescriptions than usual. It's for typical maintenance drugs like HTN, DM, etc but for some pt's they're oral RXs for over a year. Would this become an issue for audits? My store got fined a lot of money over a missing date on a noncontrolled, so if they are that strict about trivial nonsense, I'm concerned they would give us trouble over this.
And sometimes it's for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index that the pt never took before like warfarin, digoxin, etc. God forbid the pt has a bad reaction or needs a hospital stay from the new drugs and if the pt wants to sue, the doctor could simply lie and say he never authorized it.
At least with electronic and written RXs there are clear records but with oral rxs, the doctor could choose not document anything so he'll be in the clear. Phone records aren't that suffice because what the doctor says is not recorded. I've asked those doctors plenty of times to mail me a hard copy or eRX but they never send it, some even claim that they don't even have eRXs set up. Is this commonplace for you people?
And sometimes it's for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index that the pt never took before like warfarin, digoxin, etc. God forbid the pt has a bad reaction or needs a hospital stay from the new drugs and if the pt wants to sue, the doctor could simply lie and say he never authorized it.
At least with electronic and written RXs there are clear records but with oral rxs, the doctor could choose not document anything so he'll be in the clear. Phone records aren't that suffice because what the doctor says is not recorded. I've asked those doctors plenty of times to mail me a hard copy or eRX but they never send it, some even claim that they don't even have eRXs set up. Is this commonplace for you people?