- Joined
- Oct 20, 2018
- Messages
- 99
- Reaction score
- 145
I keep seeing this mentioned, can someone please help explain to me and any others who may not know what this new traffic rules are and how they might affect this cycle? Thanks!
I keep seeing this mentioned, can someone please help explain to me and any others who may not know what this new traffic rules are and how they might affect this cycle? Thanks!
Are you referring to letters of interest or intent? I'm suprised to hear this, it seems like most of the adcoms and faculty here discourage people from sending such letters.In the past most schools have put little stock in LOI's and updates. I feel that may change now. If you have been waitlisted, a judicious LOI/update in the spring may broadcast that you are still on the market and still interested, two features that a given school may find appealing as it attempts to blindly navigate its waitlist.
Are you referring to letters of interest or intent? I'm suprised to hear this, it seems like most of the adcoms and faculty here discourage people from sending such letters.
Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk
Are you referring to letters of interest or intent? I'm suprised to hear this, it seems like most of the adcoms and faculty here discourage people from sending such letters.
N=1 but I know someone who was waitlisted at a top 5 school and was accepted a week after sending a letter of intent. His stats were at the lower end of the school’s range.
N > 1 but I know many who sent letters of intent and got nothing.
Yeah it doesn’t always work. I know many people here discourage it but I sent an LOI at my top school and received an II 3 days later. My stats are below their 10th percentile. To each their own.
Thanks for your insight!True, and before they did away with the multiple acceptance report I was firmly in that camp. But the new landscape is different, and schools may be generally more interested in this type of correspondence.
We will have to see how thing shake out for a couple of cycles before a more definitive conclusion is drawn.
1) Before as @Goro always likes to point out, a letter of intent was a promise with no requirement to be kept. If schools start requiring use of "intent to enroll" via AMCAS, an applicant better make sure there is a single LOI that matches it.
2) I wonder if the constant talk of making WL/Alternate a formal status within AMCAS will also follow this path. That is, if AMCAS will add a WL tool where students can declare "intent to accept if offered." From an enrollment planning perspective, which is what these tools are for, it would make great sense.
3) Taking that further, it would make sense to have an AMCAS function for "applicant update" that could be sent out to all schools applied to. Something like a 700 character field.
1) Before as @Goro always likes to point out, a letter of intent was a promise with no requirement to be kept. If schools start requiring use of "intent to enroll" via AMCAS, an applicant better make sure there is a single LOI that matches it.
2) I wonder if the constant talk of making WL/Alternate a formal status within AMCAS will also follow this path. That is, if AMCAS will add a WL tool where students can declare "intent to accept if offered." From an enrollment planning perspective, which is what these tools are for, it would make great sense.
3) Taking that further, it would make sense to have an AMCAS function for "applicant update" that could be sent out to all schools applied to. Something like a 700 character field.
Welcome to the DO school world, everyone!Large, non-refundable deposits are going to increase... dramatically.
Fortunately they haven't yet, from my experience as a current applicant. We'll see how this changes..Large, non-refundable deposits are going to increase... dramatically.
So does this mean schools can take legal action against applicants that send more than one LOI?1) Before as @Goro always likes to point out, a letter of intent was a promise with no requirement to be kept. If schools start requiring use of "intent to enroll" via AMCAS, an applicant better make sure there is a single LOI that matches it.
2) I wonder if the constant talk of making WL/Alternate a formal status within AMCAS will also follow this path. That is, if AMCAS will add a WL tool where students can declare "intent to accept if offered." From an enrollment planning perspective, which is what these tools are for, it would make great sense.
3) Taking that further, it would make sense to have an AMCAS function for "applicant update" that could be sent out to all schools applied to. Something like a 700 character field.
From gonnif above, it looks like they're trying to change this to a bottom-up process. Instead of LOIs, could it be that they are trying to push the "Choose your medical school" tool as a mandatory process? https://students-residents.aamc.org...icle/amcas-choosing-your-medical-school-tool/So does this mean schools can take legal action against applicants that send more than one LOI?
Plus how would this system work in poaching circumstances? If an applicant matriculates at school A then gets an offer from school B and wants to go there/sent an LOI there too earlier, then what would their status be? If A was their only option, they had to have picked committed to enroll/enrolled on amcas.
This sounds like everything is just being put in more legal terms.
But how does that work with the other dates? They give us until mid April to narrow it down to 3 and the 30th to get it to one so this just seems like an extra step on our partFrom gonnif above, it looks like they're trying to change this to a bottom-up process. Instead of LOIs, could it be that they are trying to push the "Choose your medical school" tool as a mandatory process? https://students-residents.aamc.org...icle/amcas-choosing-your-medical-school-tool/
FYI from https://students-residents.aamc.org...icle/amcas-choosing-your-medical-school-tool/As for the April dates (I dont know where you got the three from), schools will be using the AMCAS tool as the way to determine that. In other words, schools are very likely going to use the AMCAS tools in lieu of taking any separate LOIs.
There is this perception that "poaching" while technically allowed, is actually going to happen. If schools will require applicants to use these tools that AMCAS is making available,; that is applicants must use "intent to enroll" (aka LOI), "commit to enroll", etc., will allow schools to know your status including matriculation. Many schools are also updating policies on acceptance offer with provision that you cannot be matriculated at time of offer. In other words, your acceptance is contingent on not being matriculated elsewhere. Despite the rumor and myth, there is likely to be little to no poaching this cycle. As for the April dates (I dont know where you got the three from), schools will be using the AMCAS tool as the way to determine that. In other words, schools are very likely going to use the AMCAS tools in lieu of taking any separate LOIs.
FYI from https://students-residents.aamc.org...icle/amcas-choosing-your-medical-school-tool/
Applicant standpoint:
Feb 19 - Plan to Enroll becomes available
Apr 15 - Asked to narrow acceptance offers to 3
Apr 30 - Commit to Enroll becomes available (Commit to Enroll = I withdrew all my other acceptances/applications)
Based on this: https://students-residents.aamc.org...ation-and-acceptance-protocols-admission-off/Do we actually go on AMCAS to commit or plan to enroll? I’m thinking the schools would be in charge of handing these? My current acceptance said they’ll send an email closer to those dates asking if you plan or commit to enroll.
What is the difference? Is committing like just saying you have an interest in the school?Do we actually go on AMCAS to commit or plan to enroll? I’m thinking the schools would be in charge of handing these? My current acceptance said they’ll send an email closer to those dates asking if you plan or commit to enroll.
What is the difference? Is committing like just saying you have an interest in the school?
This is one of many reasons that a hefty deposit is forthcoming.This was what they said.
You may choose “Plan to Enroll” or “Commit to Enroll” after April 30.
The Adcoms may have a better idea but from the phrasing, I'm guessing "plan to enroll" means you can always still defer if you get another acceptance, but "committing" means you're permanently sticking with them.
When you say forthcoming do you mean for this cycle? I thought all deposits were refundable until April? Also how much are we lookin at hereThis is one of many reasons that a hefty deposit is forthcoming.
Right now, MSAR has no provision for this. Hopefully, there will be additional space to indicate the "intent to enroll fee" by Spring.
The relatively small and refundable deposits that are collected by some schools at acceptance are not affected.When you say forthcoming do you mean for this cycle? I thought all deposits were refundable until April? Also how much are we lookin at here
Aren’t these the same thing? Most schools ask you to put down a $100-200 to hold your seat. Is this a 1000 on top of thatThe relatively small and refundable deposits that are collected by some schools at acceptance are not affected.
What will be affected are the larger, non-refundable (except as tuition) deposits that are being planned to offset the lack of traffic rules. These will be required some time during or after April, I imagine. I'd say $1,000 or so.
No. The early deposit has nothing to do with reserving a seat. They are completely refundable and do not exceed $100 (except at Georgetown).Aren’t these the same thing? Most schools ask you to put down a $100-200 to hold your seat. Is this a 1000 on top of that
So they're increasing deposits, yet a concern is that lower income people have a more difficult time getting in. How do they expect lower income applicants to afford to interview at the 20+ schools typically necessary?
Ah in my head I was thinking application fees and when I said interview I was thinking apply.You put down the deposit after getting in.
Nobody interviews at 20+ schools.
The fee assistance program (FAP) was created to help low income applicants afford the MCAT and AMCAS applications. It's not perfect, but it's far better than nothing.
Ultimately this process costs money. If you want to play the game you need to find a way to get some.
And what about applicants who can’t afford the 1000? There’s a fee assistance program for a reason, some can’t even afford the 150 for the initial application.The relatively small and refundable deposits that are collected by some schools at acceptance are not affected.
What will be affected are the larger, non-refundable (except as tuition) deposits that are being planned to offset the lack of traffic rules. These will be required some time during or after April, I imagine. I'd say $1,000 or so.
And what about applicants who can’t afford the 1000? There’s a fee assistance program for a reason, some can’t even afford the 150 for the initial application.
The fee assistance program (FAP) was created to help low income applicants afford the MCAT and AMCAS applications. It's not perfect, but it's far better than nothing.
Yes, I’m aware of that this is common place at DO schools. DO schools also only allow fee assistance up to 3 schools. They’re not exactly friendly to poorer students, I know of someone personally who couldn’t pay his deposit to a DO school and had his acceptance revoked. I don’t believe that just because DO schools do this, MD schools should to? If MD schools go this route, this will be a large barrier for myself and many other low income students I’m sure. This was a major reason why I didn’t apply to DO schools.Good question. Perhaps you should pose it in the premedical-DO forum... they have been putting up with huge deposits for years.
Offhand I think any school that is going to institute a large, non-refundable (except as tuition) deposit will have the foresight to offer partial waivers based on financial need, such as FAP status.
It will go toward tuition and thus be covered by students loans (if you matriculate there!).And what about applicants who can’t afford the 1000?
It wasn't our idea. We already explained this to the AAMC. Their lawyers only saw their exposure from the DoJ...Yes, I’m aware of that this is common place at DO schools. DO schools also only allow fee assistance up to 3 schools. They’re not exactly friendly to poorer students, I know of someone personally who couldn’t pay his deposit to a DO school and had his acceptance revoked. I don’t believe that just because DO schools do this, MD schools should to? If MD schools go this route, this will be a large barrier for myself and many other low income students I’m sure. This was a major reason why I didn’t apply to DO schools.
They may very well be out of luck sadlyAnd what about applicants who can’t afford the 1000? There’s a fee assistance program for a reason, some can’t even afford the 150 for the initial application.
What does the language of these voluntary deposits look like?Just to add to this on the large deposits, some medical schools have started something insidious a few years ago. They are asking for large deposits before April 30th that, if you read carefully, are not required. Usually this is done in conjunction with processing FA faster, etc. Why? Since it is a "voluntary" deposit, it is not covered by the refundable deposit guideline of AAMC. I have seen a few of the lower tier MD schools doing this, sometimes with their admissions "recruiters" pushing for it.
Why doesn't aamc give students the option of letting schools see the students status at other schools?Actually the DOE. Because of problems with for-profit colleges of all types, who make used car salesmen look like honest as a nun, DOE wants to prevent any collusion and non-competitive behavior. As the AAMC is a college association promoting "guidelines" as almost required regulations, they felt they were exposing themselves as well as the schools to possible legal action. What they are trying to do now is to create student centric tools that allow applicants to share or shield their acceptances, intent to enroll, etc., in conjunction with "suggesting" guidelines that each individual school should formally adopt as part of their admissions process requiring students share this above. Hence it will be each individual school requiring the use (not the AAMC) and each student will have to agree to it (not required by the AAMC). Thus the AAMC is creating the legal equivalent of a sterile field for colo-rectal surgery so they cant get infected by any legal action. In another words, CYA.
My guess is that after the winter AAMC meetings (which are soon), schools will begin to adopt these and the AAMC will rollout their tools early next year.
They're not that smart.Why doesn't aamc give students the option of letting schools see the students status at other schools?
They're not that smart.Currently that could be seen as anticompetitive collusion
Nobody knows. I'd guess it will be after the "commit" date.Do you think the new traffic rules will affect the timing of waitlist movement? Or will most of the movement still occur after the commit to enroll date?
I really don't know.@gyngyn @Med Ed @LizzyM
Do you have any thoughts on now these new traffic rules could change the behavior of schools that give out large merit scholarships to recruiter students? Do you anticipate these schools giving them out earlier, after the April “commitment” deadline or doing away with this practice entirely?
@gyngyn @Med Ed @LizzyM
Do you have any thoughts on now these new traffic rules could change the behavior of schools that give out large merit scholarships to recruiter students? Do you anticipate these schools giving them out earlier, after the April “commitment” deadline or doing away with this practice entirely?
I really don't know.
It won't change anything where I work.
In the past we never waited to offer money to high value candidates. It's pretty obvious when an applicant will have options, and if we want them we take a shot soon after the acceptance letter.
We'll have to wait a cycle or two for other institutions to make their new practices (if any) known.