I'm in the grad school phase and would like to apply for an F30 soon. I work in the bioinformatics and biostatistics realm, in terms of developing new math theory and computational methods. I notice that things tend to move more quickly and differently than my colleagues who have to wait for cultures/animals. So... I have three problems that may be unique:
1) I usually have an idea and end up exploring it intensely for 2 or 3 months until solving it. So, by the time I finish writing an F30, the problem is already solved and doesn't seem worth writing a grant about.
2) Nine out of ten of the ideas that I come up with are junk (1 only works). So, general ideas behind a grant can be easily thrown out the next day, if it is doesnt work.
3) I take many more classes than usual, >15 classes in total. I have been told that this weakens the F30 application, because people see it as taking time away from research. However, in the quantitative sciences, pretty much everyone takes a heavier course-load and its generally necessary in order to do the cool stuff.
So I am always stuck with new ideas that are completed without a grant and find myself paralyzed when it actually comes to writing an F30. I feel like I just end up writing about esoteric junk that I find out doesn't even work midway all the while in a class situation that's considered disadvantageous
Has anyone encountered a similar situation or can recommend some strategies?
1) I usually have an idea and end up exploring it intensely for 2 or 3 months until solving it. So, by the time I finish writing an F30, the problem is already solved and doesn't seem worth writing a grant about.
2) Nine out of ten of the ideas that I come up with are junk (1 only works). So, general ideas behind a grant can be easily thrown out the next day, if it is doesnt work.
3) I take many more classes than usual, >15 classes in total. I have been told that this weakens the F30 application, because people see it as taking time away from research. However, in the quantitative sciences, pretty much everyone takes a heavier course-load and its generally necessary in order to do the cool stuff.
So I am always stuck with new ideas that are completed without a grant and find myself paralyzed when it actually comes to writing an F30. I feel like I just end up writing about esoteric junk that I find out doesn't even work midway all the while in a class situation that's considered disadvantageous
Has anyone encountered a similar situation or can recommend some strategies?