- Joined
- Nov 10, 2009
- Messages
- 16,447
- Reaction score
- 8,719
So, as I've said before, the COMLEX is a poorly written, "Can I buy a vowel, Pat", get inside the head of the question writer's who want to test your abilities on the "osteopathic difference", not necessarily your medical knowledge exam. You probably made the mistake of thinking that studying for step 1 and adding the green Savarese book would be sufficient -- wrongo, boyo
The COMLEX (at least when I took it) bore no resemblance to the USMLE as it was all about testing the "osteopathic difference". The question writers apparently confused obfuscation with a good question to test your medical knowledge, much like the OMM department at TCOM when I was there. These clowns wanted to make the test "more rigorous" so they went into a conference room and figured out ways to obfuscate questions...but I digress....
Use Comquest and get through all of it -- I did that and my scores went up by a noticeable amount -- I used Kaplan for level 1, UWorld for level 2 and Comquest for level 3 -- studied less and got a higher score on level 3 than the 2 prior levels.
it's not you -- it's the idiocy that is the AOA and their determination to maintain the "osteopathic" difference -- Just look at what they addressed as a serious medical problem facing our society -- game player's thumb -- really? With the AIDS epidemic, resurgence of syphilis, opioid problem, heroin overdosing, underage pregnancy among others, the best you guy's can do is "game player's thumb?"....
clueless idiots -- and most think the OMM is what makes osteopaths different -- hint: that ain't the case...
I'm under the impression they offer two comlex exams lol. Half my class thought it was absurd, the other half including me thought it was just a more chill usmle.