Can be both. I have seen VC closure several times and chest wall rigidity a few timesI thought we decided that it was due to laryngeal closure
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Favorite MAC tricks?
Started by Toothpickwars
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
One of the most elegant study i've seen.I thought we decided that it was due to laryngeal closure
Arch Guillotti
Senior Member
Staff member
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
Lifetime Donor
20+ Year Member
I’ve seen some people give as much as 8mcg/kg of remi for an RSI (in the days before sugammadex). Intubating conditions were excellent, approximated sux. Gave 30mg of ephedrine as a chaser, train track vitals. FWIW
Whether it's "chest wall rigidity" (it isn't) or vocal cord closure (it is) the effect on mask ventilation is the same and the treatment is the same, so there's not much point splitting hairs.It's not real
But if the tube is in and you can’t ventilate because the compliance is 0 then its definitely chest wall rigidity. Ive seen it and it was immediately relieved with sux. It wasn’t an obstruction or in the gooseWhether it's "chest wall rigidity" (it isn't) or vocal cord closure (it is) the effect on mask ventilation is the same and the treatment is the same, so there's not much point splitting hairs.
I don't deny that the effect is the same but i wouldn't say that differenciating between 2 totally different concepts is splitting hairs. Invoking "Chest wall rigity" screams "i haven't spent 5min to think about the physiological concept of what i'm saying".Whether it's "chest wall rigidity" (it isn't) or vocal cord closure (it is) the effect on mask ventilation is the same and the treatment is the same, so there's not much point splitting hairs.
Because I read it here and then looked up the lit, I've tucked this one under my belt for those situations where it's appropriate. I've done it twice I think.I remember reading that a nasal trumpet will alleviate hiccups from propofol during mac cases.
I think I've mentioned before that there's an inverse relationship to how elaborate the dressing is, to how well the IV will flow (or is strictly ornamental).When the preop nurse puts in the IV and its taped like a pile of @#$% with the catheter halfway out and they go "its positional" and of course the case is TIVA.
Edit: This was supposed to go in the pet peeves thread lol.
Deity level s&it hereMy favorite MAC trick is telling the surgeon that they are really asking for GA and then performing it and charting it appropriately as GA
But if the tube is in and you can’t ventilate because the compliance is 0 then its definitely chest wall rigidity. Ive seen it and it was immediately relieved with sux. It wasn’t an obstruction or in the goose
So you routinely intubate without muscle relaxant?
Arch Guillotti
Senior Member
Staff member
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
Lifetime Donor
20+ Year Member
Not convinced.But if the tube is in and you can’t ventilate because the compliance is 0 then its definitely chest wall rigidity. Ive seen it and it was immediately relieved with sux. It wasn’t an obstruction or in the goose
Used to before covid.So you routinely intubate without muscle relaxant?
Not sure what else it could be. Patient was not light either. All I can say is that VC closure is much more common and Ive had to give sux quite a few times for that.Not convinced.
BronchospasmNot sure what else it could be
Relieved with sux?Bronchospasm