twester said:
I wish the women of this country would stand up and make their outrage known (if it exists). Whatever happened to feminism?
I was preparing a speech to present to a class on Pharm's refusing to fill EC and had to do a pre-survey of opinions. Can you believe ALL females who responded answered with "no opinion". All of the male respondents had an opinion...most against the pharmacist's actions. I thought that was pretty strange so asked about it after my speech. The women had no idea there was any controversy going on, or that the FDA was considering going OTC.
So I guess this is the general reason for no outrage, they're not aware.
twester said:
Reproductive services centers should be funded to the level that they can remain open 7 days a week. That would allow women to seek EC at anytime it's needed.
But this leaves out too many places like the rural town I live in where there are no centers. The only option on weekends is the ER. Nearest city with a clinic is 60 miles. I think EC should be available in pharmacies OTC. If it must be restricted to over 18, fine. But, even if the under-aged get their hands on it, isn't prevention much better than the decisions they will be forced to make if pregnancy occurs? Oops, sorry, don't want to start that debate.
For those who believe it will be overused/abused/create promiscuity, the same things were said in the UK before it went OTC in Jan '01. A follow up study printed in the British Medical Journal showed that just isn't true.
It did not influence women's sexual attitudes or behavior, and there was no change in the rate of EC use. The only change they saw was that most women bought it thru the pharmacy instead of a doctor/hospital/family planning clinic.
The FDA is running scared. They've been in the public spotlight too many times lately. That's being compounded by the current administration pushing it's morality where it doesn't belong. We'll probably just have to wait it out.