- Joined
- Mar 24, 2013
- Messages
- 920
- Reaction score
- 300
I feel like Uworld kind of repeats the same concepts over and over again. In the final crunch month would First aid with Pathoma more high yield?
Personally, I would skim FA with a fine tooth comb. Believe it or not, there actually were a couple of one liners that I happened to recognize on test day that were slam dunks. And yes, take the NBMEs and free questions. While much different than the real thing, they were the best practice.
Mine was like uworld in the way it was presented, but a little harder and a few more ambiguous questions.Did you feel like the real exam was more like Uworld or NBME or a mixture or neither? lol
Mine was like uworld in the way it was presented, but a little harder and a few more ambiguous questions.
Mine was like uworld in the way it was presented, but a little harder and a few more ambiguous questions.
I don't know its hard to explain. After doing uworld 2x, I felt like uworld has a way of asking questions and steering you toward an answer. Hence when I did their assessment exam, I did pretty well, because you are used to the way that their writers ask questions. I would maybe rephrase my statement and say some subjects, biochem, pharm, cv were easier on the real exam, but topics like GI, repro, genetics, developmental questions, and general knowledge were tougher. I felt less sure of most of the questions that I answered, meanwhile in uworld, I had a good sense of I got this one incorrect and I got this one correct.A little harder than uworld ??? Seriously? In what way ?
I don't know its hard to explain. After doing uworld 2x, I felt like uworld has a way of asking questions and steering you toward an answer. Hence when I did their assessment exam, I did pretty well, because you are used to the way that their writers ask questions. I would maybe rephrase my statement and say some subjects, biochem, pharm, cv were easier on the real exam, but topics like GI, repro, genetics, developmental questions, and general knowledge were tougher. I felt less sure of most of the questions that I answered, meanwhile in uworld, I had a good sense of I got this one incorrect and I got this one correct.
The real deal puts a lot more stuff on the exam that may not have been covered in one's review, so it gives the impression its tougher. I only found a few of those questions on the NBMEs and thus, it was personally easy for me to score 85-90% on some of the nbmes. Also keep in mind that the NBMEs are used to gauge a predictive three digit score, that is what they have been shown to accurately predict, not necessarily percentages correlating vs uworld and vs the real deal. The nbme exams are generally older exam questions where NBME has an established bell curve, whereas the SDN bell curve or even http://clinicalreview.com/ClinicalReview/resources/usmle-score-calculator.html say 70+% is a 250. I averaged around 70% first pass and I am not confident that I can say I should be scoring around 250, given the amount of curveballs on the exam.Yes, but in theory people scoring around 80% in uworld end up with 250+ on the real deal (or so SDN makes it seem like so atleast). And scoring 80+ on uworld blocks consistently is quite a challenge itself. Whereas, getting 80% right on the real deal usually comes to a score of 220 on the NBMEs. So technically the real deal should be easier ??? Ofcourse I haven't even taken the thing yet, what would I know 😛