How did you guys switch to firecracker? There is no link in gt that says click here to convert to firecracker...or maybe it's cus I'm still on the free trial
I don't think firecracker is fully functional yet. It's more of a preview.
Sorry LoO, you are not allowed to access that page.
http://blog.firecracker.me/happy-4th-of-july-from-firecracker/
here's what it looks like without having to fill anything out. The new platform looks pretty cool!
You can try it out for free for a couple of months- PM me and I'll set you up!
Brian
Should be on the order of days to weeks, not months. -B
Yeah they do! I'm still working on step 1, so i couldn't tell you much about 'em though...does FC include material step 2 material as well?
Yeah they do! I'm still working on step 1, so i couldn't tell you much about 'em though...
I guess I'm a little behind the pack, but I'm starting to see giant flaws in the firecracker algorithm. FC has been making a lot of really good updates lately, but the algorithm is the most important feature. If you have multiple questions from one day you rate a 5, many will show up next time on the same day. If you keep rating them 5s, or 4s, then these questions will always show up together, which again gives an artificial boost in recall. It seems like FC stopped incorporating the individual history of each card for each person. It takes away from the personalization of the algorithm and therefore FC, which makes using it much less effective. Am I just blowing smoke here?
I guess I'm a little behind the pack, but I'm starting to see giant flaws in the firecracker algorithm. FC has been making a lot of really good updates lately, but the algorithm is the most important feature. If you have multiple questions from one day you rate a 5, many will show up next time on the same day. If you keep rating them 5s, or 4s, then these questions will always show up together, which again gives an artificial boost in recall. It seems like FC stopped incorporating the individual history of each card for each person. It takes away from the personalization of the algorithm and therefore FC, which makes using it much less effective. Am I just blowing smoke here?
Have you reported the errors? I know I have reported a fair amount since beginning FC

I no longer have the option to report errors. Is the little bar at the bottom of the page gone for everyone, or did they just get stick of getting inundated with feedback from me (mostly simple stuff like characters that didn't transfer properly from the GT cards, but some content stuff too)?
It is a little concerning that they don't seem to be following up on this stuff, though. The Pulm card on chronic cough has had comments about an error for 3 months and it still hasn't been changed, and I don't think I've had any responses to any of the reports I've sent in. Quality seems to be slipping on the new cards, and the rating algorhythm is clearly flawed...
I use the feedback button on the middle left edge of the screen. They have been good at getting back to me about the several issues I reported. They need to update people more often, And fix those standing errors!
Hey guys. I read that Gunner Training is pretty much First Aid in flashcards, and forces you to memorize the information. I'm a very visual learning, and I think that I would be interested in the GT system. Can the same be said with FireCracker? It will help you learn/memorize First aid and it relates will to FA material?
FireCracker IS Gunner Training. It's just a different website. I had my reservations about FC and the switch from GT was frustrating, especially mid MS2. But I am loving FC. Let me put it in perspective:
BRS + Various books ~ 1000 Qs
MS1 + MS2 tests = 300Qs/block * 14 blocks = 4200 Qs
NBME Subject Exams (Anatomy, Cell, Physio, Psych, Neuro, Path, Biochem, Micro...I think that's all) = 200/test * 8 = 1600
2 Q Banks ~ 4000 Qs
Repeating flagged/missed ~ 2500 Qs
Full Lengths, NBMEs, Diagnostic tests ~ 1500
Total = 14,800 Questions (If my math is right)
== FireCracker ==
I started in June after MS1. I started with 100-150 Qs, went up down, missed days, etc. I'm now doing 200-300/day...so this is napkin math. Step 1 is in June.
150 Qs/day * 7 days/week * 52 weeks = 54,600
---------------------
I could have missed something in there and be off by orders of magnitudes, but I'm pretty sure that's accurate. Now for some musings.
Learn the stuff from classwork. All review material, FC included, assumes you understand some stuff. Cohesive intellectualization of some of the more difficult concepts needs proper explanation from lectures or primary sources. Once you get the ideas, FC pounds them in. It also pounds in trigger words. It also pounds in things you suck at memorizing because you see the questions every freaking day.
I haven't taken Step 1, so I defer to the veterans, but a few things I've noted. I am doing good in all my classes, but school specific questions tend to focus on topics they stressed, not necessarily stuff stressed by FA, Q banks, or Step 1. Therefore, my grades could be better if I spent less time on FC. That said, I have not done poorly on a test all year. Also, I feel very confident on all subjects while many classmates haven't looked at stuff like blood cell dyscrasia in months. While some classmates may be beating me on lecture tests, I am doing very well on random questions from Q banks. (Averaging mid 70s in Kaplan).
FC lets you know what you're weak at because you see it over and over, Q banks tell you what you're weak at with low scores in certain areas. Those together provide useful feedback and guide dedicated study time so that you aren't "mindlessly" reading FA.
Hope that helps. Thank you FC. I recommend it to all my classmates.
Maybe I'm overlooking or missing something but there doesn't seem to be a section on the eyes (anatomy, physiology, etc.) save for a pathology slide in neuro. Anyone else find this odd?
Uh do they ever put eye anatomy/physiology questions on step 1? I've never heard anyone indicate a question on that topic coming up.
Maybe I'm overlooking or missing something but there doesn't seem to be a section on the eyes (anatomy, physiology, etc.) save for a pathology slide in neuro. Anyone else find this odd?
Can anyone share a Step 1 FC/GT success story?
How much of FC is MS1 material? I know each school has slightly different curriculum, but mine was systems based with basically zero path during first year.
You can test out the program for free for a month without any commitment just so you know. To answer your question directly though, material covers all typical first year courses except Histology and Physiology.
You can test out the program for free for a month without any commitment just so you know. To answer your question directly though, material covers all typical first year courses except Histology and Physiology.
a little under half? 1100 total topics or so, about 500 can be considered M1 material