$99 doesn't seem bad compared to FC. I wish they had more micro sample cards though.. The free cards they have up are terrible imo.
You just have to pic and choose the cards that you need. It's a big time sink otherwise. For me, it's biochem cards for obscure diseases.
-Lysosomal storage diseases (I can't tell you how many times I got these wrong reviewing them in FC...and I still struggle with them)
-Interferons and cytokines
So are there any discounts going around for FC these days? Or is the only option $400 for a 1 year subscription?
I chose Tay-Sachs, but the answer was NP.
I meant that I wish I could see more of the micro cards. I've heard good things about them, which is why I'm considering it. Based on my own experience (with the free cards) I wouldn't make the purchase because none of the free ones help me at all.
I have got a few questions about GT/FC. (my school will be P/F so i don't care about scoring high on exams)
1) Is it best to read the textbook to master the material before using GT or can you use GT after just sitting in lecture? Which is more beneficial?
2) Does GT teach you the material or does it just help you not forgot what you learned?
3) How do you deal with topics in GT that are not covered in class?
Lippy Microcards, hands down. It's exactly what you need to know, nothing more, nothing less. The rest little minutea you'll pick up between FA and UWorld
I'm an MS1 not doing UW yet. Still think Lippincott's is sufficient?
Enough to pass. You can always add this: http://www.amazon.com/Medical-Microbiology-Immunology-Twelfth-Edition/dp/0071774343
Just like any other shelf (assuming you have them) questions is what will help you destory them.
We don't do NBME shelfs here. Any experience with this one? http://www.amazon.com/Schaechters-Mechanisms-Microbial-Disease-Engleberg/dp/0781787440/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1394742142&sr=8-2&keywords=schaechter microbiology
Nope, looks pretty good though. I heard this once, and couldn't agree with it more: The best book is the one you read. Skim both at the bookstore and order the one you think you'll read.
I'm an MS1 not doing UW yet. Still think Lippincott's is sufficient?
I really do, but at the same time I am not one of those people who are dead set on being top 10% of class or anything. In terms of what you need to know long term, it's all in there
+1 for this book. I'm in Micro right now and it's VERY helpful.Enough to pass. You can always add this: http://www.amazon.com/Medical-Microbiology-Immunology-Twelfth-Edition/dp/0071774343
Just like any other shelf (assuming you have them) questions is what will help you destory them.
For firecracker users-
Are you guys ever marking "never see this card again" for stuff that you think is mundane/useless?
For the anatomy section, I have been removing cards that simply ask about some obscure muscle and what all of its actions are. I think if I have to memorize every single muscle I studied in anatomy w/ its innervation and all its actions, it would make FC 100x more tedius, boring and annoying to learn for something that seems so low yield. Now what I have NOT been removing are cards that deal with entire compartments or major muscles (i.e. gluteus max) or groups of muscles (i.e. quadriceps) or clinically important spaces/regions (i.e. extensor retinaculum, etc.).
I just don't think it is a good use of my time to memorize every single action of foot muscles or what muscles are in what layer etc. What do you guys think?
For firecracker users-
Are you guys ever marking "never see this card again" for stuff that you think is mundane/useless?
For the anatomy section, I have been removing cards that simply ask about some obscure muscle and what all of its actions are. I think if I have to memorize every single muscle I studied in anatomy w/ its innervation and all its actions, it would make FC 100x more tedius, boring and annoying to learn for something that seems so low yield. Now what I have NOT been removing are cards that deal with entire compartments or major muscles (i.e. gluteus max) or groups of muscles (i.e. quadriceps) or clinically important spaces/regions (i.e. extensor retinaculum, etc.).
I just don't think it is a good use of my time to memorize every single action of foot muscles or what muscles are in what layer etc. What do you guys think?
For firecracker users-
Are you guys ever marking "never see this card again" for stuff that you think is mundane/useless?
For the anatomy section, I have been removing cards that simply ask about some obscure muscle and what all of its actions are. I think if I have to memorize every single muscle I studied in anatomy w/ its innervation and all its actions, it would make FC 100x more tedius, boring and annoying to learn for something that seems so low yield. Now what I have NOT been removing are cards that deal with entire compartments or major muscles (i.e. gluteus max) or groups of muscles (i.e. quadriceps) or clinically important spaces/regions (i.e. extensor retinaculum, etc.).
I just don't think it is a good use of my time to memorize every single action of foot muscles or what muscles are in what layer etc. What do you guys think?
I do it very rarely. Nothing in FC is useless, imo.. mundane? Yes, but that's not a reason to mark it as never see again. It's important to know all of it and I have only "never agained" things that I will never forget.
Two examples that come to mind are "bilirubin is a breakdown product of what?" and "what is the final electron acceptor?" Two things that an 8th grader probably knows.

Off topic, but I'd bet that 95% of undergrad students wouldn't even know what bilirubin is. And I'd say at least 5% of med students nationally would say that bilirubin helps emulsify fat in the intestinal lumen...if you phrased the question right.![]()
Off topic, but I'd bet that 95% of undergrad students wouldn't even know what bilirubin is. And I'd say at least 5% of med students nationally would say that bilirubin helps emulsify fat in the intestinal lumen...if you phrased the question right.![]()
Fair enough. 8th grader thing is definitely true about the final electron acceptor though.
Also, really? Only 5% of med students would say that bile salts help emulsify fat? Of the two need-to-know things about bile (emulsify and cholesterol excretion) I more often forget about it being the only way to excrete cholesterol.
I think he was saying 5% would incorrectly state that the function of bilirubin is to emulsify fats, when in reality it is bile salts. I'd probably be one of those people though. I tend to completely misread things at times.
Full USMLE Step 1 Flashcards from First Aid for USMLE Step 1... http://usmlefasttrack.com
Its from First Aid for the USMLE Step 1 Book so its definitely a must for everyone that is studying... It takes too long to keep reading first aid over and over so if you can do it faster by using flashcard its definitely a must.
I agree 100%, especially with "FC has a ton of extraneous information that is unlikely to show up anywhere. "I think the opposite is true. FC has a ton of extraneous information that is unlikely to show up anywhere. I'm like 75% through Uworld right now and completed NBME and while FC has helped, so much of FC is devoted to brute force memorization of everything. No question is ever going to be "complete the pentad: seizures, mental ******ation, ataxia, hamartomas". Having an intuitive understanding is way more important than brute force memorization.
Also, never ever flag anatomy or embyro on FC. It's just a waste of time. The anatomy on NBME 6 was so damn straightforward and even the anatomy on Uworld is pretty chill.
edit: This is what I'm talking about "What is the most common cause of dilated cardiacmyopathy? Ans: idiopathic although some can be familial" This tidbit has zero learning use and no board exam is going to ask that question.
I think the opposite is true. FC has a ton of extraneous information that is unlikely to show up anywhere. I'm like 75% through Uworld right now and completed NBME and while FC has helped, so much of FC is devoted to brute force memorization of everything. No question is ever going to be "complete the pentad: seizures, mental ******ation, ataxia, hamartomas". Having an intuitive understanding is way more important than brute force memorization.
Also, never ever flag anatomy or embyro on FC. It's just a waste of time. The anatomy on NBME 6 was so damn straightforward and even the anatomy on Uworld is pretty chill.
edit: This is what I'm talking about "What is the most common cause of dilated cardiacmyopathy? Ans: idiopathic although some can be familial" This tidbit has zero learning use and no board exam is going to ask that question.
I flagged everything, but I was very liberal with the "don't see this again" optionAlright, everything flagged now except the monster that is anatomy. I know we have discussed this somewhat before, but for people that have already plowed through FC anatomy, do you feel like its worth it? Or should I go with a different source altogether to hit anatomy? Did you only strategically flag or hit everything?
I flagged everything, but I was very liberal with the "don't see this again" option
I have done kaplan and Rx and don't recall ever seeing an origin/insertion question.Anything specific you felt was low yield? origins/insertions?
FA anatomy is all you need for Uworld save for the random question that no one gets right anyways.
Do you really want to play through a thousand cards worded like this : "The sciatic nerve innervates all posterior leg muscles excpet the short head of the tendenous muscle, which is innervated by a branch off the obturartor nerve called nerve to the tendenous"
It's so ******* low yield and no exam will ask you that question.
Agree. That is what I'm going to do as exam date gets closer.There is no protocol. Your idea works. Other options:
From your daily review you can pick the topics you'd like to be quizzed on.
"Never see again". Use it liberally on stuff you don't want to be quizzed on anymore.
I probably won't be doing FC during dedicated.