Fired from a job - how to deflect in an interview

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

GeoDoc

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I did a little search and did not find much on this subject, but here's a little situation I am in:

I consider myself a mostly avg., mid-tier applicant - 31Q, 3.5 GPA, but with pretty strong extracurriculurs: I was a mental health tech in the military and spent a year deployed to Iraq, I worked as a tech in an ER on the weekends for two years in college, and good volunteer record, etc.

Anyway, I moved from Minnesota to California last year, just because I knew I would have some time before the 2010 app cycle, and figured it could help diversify my background some more for CA and other OOS schools since I didn't get any interviews from these types last time I applied. I was very fortunate, and got a nice full-time job with bene's as a Research Associate at UCLA, and thought it would hopefully be the icing on the cake - clinical, volunteer, and now research on the app. So I included it on my primaries and all my secondaries.

Well, I just was "involuntarily released from the probationary period" after about 3.5 months; my boss really did not seem to like me very much, and essentially they wanted somebody who just had more job experience and administrative background (I had none, and was just learning everything on the fly).

A blow to the ego, to be sure, but my question is how do I handle questions about this in upcoming interviews this winter? I have lost my income and will prob have to move back to MN, which clearly will stand out as opposed to the much more logical alternative of simply sticking with a good job in CA until school starts next year. Thus, I will not be able to pull the usual, "yeeah, I just needed an opportunity for more responsibility" or "I felt like I had accomplished a lot and wanted to grow in other areas"...Basically, I failed in this respect, and now I need to figure out how damaging this is going to look in the interview. Especially as it happened just a few months prior to any potential interview - no "those were my wild and immature days" type of spinning either.

Last part then: do you think it would matter much whether I return to MN or stay in CA? Who would this matter to? I might try to stick it out here in LA through interview season but it's so expensive I don't know how long I can last.

Thanks, as always, for your candid and helpful thoughts! Have a good day...
 
It's California, the most broke state in the union, and you worked for a state institution. Last in, first out. That's how it goes.

You might be better off in MN.
 
^Great advice, as always.
 
It's California, the most broke state in the union, and you worked for a state institution. Last in, first out. That's how it goes.

You might be better off in MN.



Thanks, Top and Shindotp...if anybody else is reading this, I'd love to hear other perspectives too. I might have to steal the "last in, first out" line from Top for explaining to friends and fam, but does anybody else have an idea of how to phrase it to the interviewer a little less matter-of-factly? 🙂 Thanks again, all...
 
last to hire, first to fire

no big deal, say you were laid off. it happens all the time.

don't use them as a reference. it isn't a big deal.
 
Cool, thanks everyone. Just out of curiosity: do schools even normally look into things like truncated extracurriculurs? Seems like it would be a lot of trouble for them...
 
Last edited:
they wanted somebody who just had more job experience and administrative background (I had none, and was just learning everything on the fly).

I'd go with the truth. Most people who have held professional type jobs have experienced this type of thing. They hire you for a position that requires a substantial knowledgebase even if you aren't qualified. Then they get upset at your learning curve and you get a boot in the ass out the door.

I'd go with "They hired me for a position I wasn't qualified for. I did not represent that I was qualified for it in my resume or the interview, but they gave me a chance anyway. When they realized that I wasn't going to suit their needs, they let me go."

I don't see the harm in admitting that you don't have administrative experience and that was the reason for your dismissal.
 
I'd go with the truth. Most people who have held professional type jobs have experienced this type of thing. They hire you for a position that requires a substantial knowledgebase even if you aren't qualified. Then they get upset at your learning curve and you get a boot in the ass out the door.

I'd go with "They hired me for a position I wasn't qualified for. I did not represent that I was qualified for it in my resume or the interview, but they gave me a chance anyway. When they realized that I wasn't going to suit their needs, they let me go."

I don't see the harm in admitting that you don't have administrative experience and that was the reason for your dismissal.

That's probably the best thing to do...although I don't think you should say that weren't qualified for the position in the first place, just say you were not experienced enough, or were not the best fit for the job (all of these are things you only found out after they laid you off).
 
Just tell the partial truth: the economy is bad and I was laid off. They understand, they struggle for funding every day.
 
Top