First Aid 2000/2005

[DeVyne]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

Hey everyone,

Do you think it's okay to use the First Aid 2000? And would anyone know if there are major differences between the 2000 edition and the 2005?
Thank you,
Zainab 🙂

 

[Taus]

A year or 2 old should be ok (except for some pharm), but older then that......just shell out the cash...this test is kind of important...

 

[superdevil]

well...if you look on amazon, the 2000 edition has 401 pages and the 2005 has 530. that's a pretty big difference, plus the text is influenced by feedback from test-takers every year. there's just no reason to use an old one.

 

[lord_jeebus]

2000 might be too old, but I think the 2005 edition should still suffice. I used it 🙂

 

[treasurefull2]

Hey everyone,

Do you think it's okay to use the First Aid 2000? And would anyone know if there are major differences between the 2000 edition and the 2005?
Thank you,
Zainab 🙂

why the hell would you even think about this? it is now 2007...

 

[DeVyne]

Hey everyone! Thanks for your replies!

 

[cdql]

Absolutely not!

I know a couple of kids who bought the 2006 FA and halfway thru their studying, realized there was new information in the 2007 FA and had to switch.

At that point, they could either a) transcribe all they've written in the 2006 to the 2007 or b) carry around both copies like dopes.

Conclusion? Now is not the time to play cheapskate. Buy the 2007, make it worth the money by studying well, and you'll never have to worry about whether or not using an older version of FA may or may not have impacted your scores.