http://www.firstaidteam.com/updates-and-corrections
"only" 6 pages... a vast improvement upon the 2012
"only" 6 pages... a vast improvement upon the 2012
Jesus i'd take 6 pages over 27 pages any day. Note that the major corrections are only 3 pages!http://www.firstaidteam.com/updates-and-corrections
"only" 6 pages... a vast improvement upon the 2012
Confused a little on one of their statements:
Page 136 Salmonella vs. Shigella
Under the column for Shigella, note that antibiotic therapy shortens the duration of organism excretion (shedding) in the stool.
Maybe its just me, but the wording really sucks.
Are they trying to say that antibiotics help with Shigella (vs. Salmonella were they don't)?
Thanks.
EDIT: just reread your question and caught something: it doesn't say it shortens excretion, it says it prolongs excretion...there's your confusion
The errata actually says that it shortens excretion. (they changed it from prolongs to shortens)
anyone?
My understanding from this (I haven't reviewed it yet, though) is that in Shigella, antibiotic therapy decreases the amount of time that the infected person is shedding Shigella in the stool, thereby shortening the time that they can possibly cause infection to spread to someone else. I'm not sure about its comparison to Salmonella, though...maybe antibiotics don't decrease the duration of stool shedding in Salmonella?
On Pg. 356, under G6PD Deficiency, FA says "RBCs primarily destroyed extravascularly."
Both Pathoma and Goljan RR Path say that G6PD Deficiency is primarily intravascular hemolysis.
Can anyone comment on this? Thanks.