- Joined
- Nov 27, 2013
- Messages
- 39
- Reaction score
- 14
- Points
- 4,691
- Age
- 37
- Location
- Washington, D.C.
- Non-Student
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Bottom line up front: would it be ill-advised to attempt Physics I and II consecutively over the summer (two six-week sessions)?
I'm planning on starting UMD's "Science in the Evening" program this summer, but have been struggling with which class to begin with. The choice comes down to taking Physics I and Physics II, or just Chem I. I feel more comfortable with topics in physics over those dealing with chemistry, but this is really based on high school experience, as my undergraduate degree is in Criminology with no science courses.
So is there a reason most ped-med/post bacc programs seem to leave the Physics year towards the end of their curriculae? From what I gather, Physics appears to be significantly harder for most than Chem; would it be unwise to make that even more difficult by taking it over the summer instead of a full semester?
Finally, the reason I'm really considering Physics is because I can knock out both semesters in one summer term, whereas UMD only offers Gen Chem I for it's first 6-week session, and the only other course that could possibly benefit me (med school application-wise) for the second session would be "Advanced Writing".
Obviously, just like everyone else here, I'm aiming for a 4.0 in all post bacc work, so I'm very receptive to the answer "take Chem I and wait for the standard, non-accelerated Physics courses". To me, taking it a little slower with just Chem I and spending an extra six months in post bacc may be worth the possible GPA points after I hear all your advice.
I'm planning on starting UMD's "Science in the Evening" program this summer, but have been struggling with which class to begin with. The choice comes down to taking Physics I and Physics II, or just Chem I. I feel more comfortable with topics in physics over those dealing with chemistry, but this is really based on high school experience, as my undergraduate degree is in Criminology with no science courses.
So is there a reason most ped-med/post bacc programs seem to leave the Physics year towards the end of their curriculae? From what I gather, Physics appears to be significantly harder for most than Chem; would it be unwise to make that even more difficult by taking it over the summer instead of a full semester?
Finally, the reason I'm really considering Physics is because I can knock out both semesters in one summer term, whereas UMD only offers Gen Chem I for it's first 6-week session, and the only other course that could possibly benefit me (med school application-wise) for the second session would be "Advanced Writing".
Obviously, just like everyone else here, I'm aiming for a 4.0 in all post bacc work, so I'm very receptive to the answer "take Chem I and wait for the standard, non-accelerated Physics courses". To me, taking it a little slower with just Chem I and spending an extra six months in post bacc may be worth the possible GPA points after I hear all your advice.
