- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 444
- Reaction score
- 29
A problem asks what the relationship between collision frequency and # particles is.
The answer was LINEAR relationship, and i was fairly confused. But i expected a good mathematical explanation to learn from.
Their answer was: collision frequency affects pressure. Pressure is directly proportional to # of moles via PV=nRT. Because the relationship of pressure to moles is linear, the relationship of collision frequency and nber of moles should also be linear.
Uh hey~ what?
Alright so collision freq affects pressure... But what if collision frequency and pressure are not 1:1 related? What if collision frequency affects pressure like radius affects gravitational force (1/r^2)? Saying that one affects another does not imply linear correlation, only that there is some kind of relationship.
I dont doubt their answer itself, but their process of getting there makes no sense.
The answer was LINEAR relationship, and i was fairly confused. But i expected a good mathematical explanation to learn from.
Their answer was: collision frequency affects pressure. Pressure is directly proportional to # of moles via PV=nRT. Because the relationship of pressure to moles is linear, the relationship of collision frequency and nber of moles should also be linear.
Uh hey~ what?
Alright so collision freq affects pressure... But what if collision frequency and pressure are not 1:1 related? What if collision frequency affects pressure like radius affects gravitational force (1/r^2)? Saying that one affects another does not imply linear correlation, only that there is some kind of relationship.
I dont doubt their answer itself, but their process of getting there makes no sense.