owlegrad
Uncontrollable Sarcasm Machine
Staff member
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
Lifetime Donor
15+ Year Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2009
- Messages
- 25,314
- Reaction score
- 11,929
Not in AZ, MN, TX, NY, or FL at least (I think CA as well). Emergent situations are excusable under extenuating circumstances for legend drugs (insulin to a diabetic, epi-pen in these situations). Just get the documentation done afterward and it's fine. There's no Board issue whatsoever. TX doesn't even require reconciliation with the prescriber under their emergency refill regulation.
I do expect that the pharmacist makes good on it from a cost standpoint afterwards (insurance or cash), but this is trivial to deal with.
FL is somewhat tricky. We are allowed to dispense based on 'emergency' need in two scenarios. One, the patient has been on the medication previously and is out of refills and it is the pharmacist's judgement that the patient would be harmed by missing doses while waiting for a refill to be authorized from prescriber blah blah blah. I seem to recall that it has to be a maintenance medication, but I could be wrong and I am not nearly interested enough to go look it up right now. Another interesting point I recall about that law is it specifically does allow for controls to be dispensed under that provision although I suspect that no pharmacy in FL would ever allow that, period. And of course just because FL allows for it does not mean that the DEA would allow it under federal law.
Two, if the governor declares a state of emergency there are all kinds of special provisions for emergency dispensing. I don't recall them all but in my mind I always picture it wild-west style where anything goes. LOL
I am not aware of any regulation that allows us to dispense a prescription to a patient where the pharmacy has no record of that patient ever having a prescription for said medication. So if the patient was out of refills for their epipen or proair but had a record of said prescription with the pharmacy, we could probably get away with it under that provision, "maintenance" med notwithstanding.
Also, I am not aware of any regulation that would allow a pharmacist to self-medicate under any circumstance and that is what the OP is referring to.