- Joined
- Sep 24, 2002
- Messages
- 147
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 48
monet said:Shut up charliemurhpy if you don't have anything constructive to say then stay off this forum![]()

roady said:I agree 110%. Come back when you shed some of your arrogance, "CharlieMurphy". People/doctors like you are the reason I'll never go to a hospital unless I'm just about dead; I might still not go then.
CharlieMurphy said:First of all, you honestly think someone that failed will private message and basically tell you that they are an idiot. Second, say there is someone stupid enough to PM you, do you honestly want to listen to her advice, its like asking a DO for advice. Finally, and most importantly, you studied and put a lot of time into preparing for this exam. God willing you will do fine.
Good Luck
, but the stats are not always correct for predicting your score:
KittenKnows said:You for sure can't ignore the big 3, but let me put it to you this way. Much of the molecular bio that I had was incorporated into a physio or biochem or pharm type question. I left this exam thinking "what aspect of this test was medicine?"
For some reason molecular is big on some of the exams. In hindsight I should have just got up and left, but I kept hoping it would get better. Some of the questions were really bizarre type of research experiments too. For example: removing an organ then putting it back and asking you physiologically what was going on after you put it back. Like how the crap are we supposed to know??? My entire test was like this and it was a joy to get one or two straighforward micro or path questions.
Before I got my scores back, I dug up my old molecular bio book from undergrad with the intention of using it to study in case I failed.
Just pray you don't get the hard molecular version or you are screwed unless you have a solid background in this area. Because think about it: how many practice questions did you come across in Qbank or anywhere else that dealt with a combination of molecular bio and physio for example. If I had studied more molecular on my own I am certain my score would have at least been around 220.
Good luck!
![]()
some on here like bigf used HY mol and cell bio, they've the preview pages on amazon. Its really small but supposedly should be sufficient.roady said:Maxine and KittenKnows and Monet--
I just wanted to say I love you guys. Thanks for giving me some inspiration through your stories as I trudge ahead with 12 days of preparation to the big one.
Don't fret KN especially--I know that you'd be worse off if you failed, plus there's still other chances for redemtion. FREAK molecular bilogy!!
😍 😍 😍
P.S. Any good , hi-yield sources for Molecular Biology preparation with my 12 days to go?? Thanks!!
maxine said:i had it shipped overnight from barnes noble... but it may be in your library. I am a caribbean grad, so that was not an option for me. It's about 100 pp... lets hope it does the trick. Personally, I hope i wasted the money and I get a version that is light on the topic. That was my original post... what are the chances of me getting the same version that i had before, that reeked of cell bio, genetics and ct scans.???
KittenKnows said:You just never know what you will get. I keep wondering how it would have been if I had just bailed on that test and retook it at a later date in hope of a better version. I also wonder if maybe it would have just been better if I had failed, since I was so close to failing anyway. Then at least I could try to redeem my score. Now what? 185 is going to stick out like a huge zit! Do you think it would make any difference if I did really well on Step 2?