- Joined
- Mar 13, 2003
- Messages
- 2,197
- Reaction score
- 1,241
What's your preference? Why?
What's your preference? Why?
Desflurane for just about everybody. Flows to 0.5 lpm right after induction, vaporizor set to 12. ET des rises gradually. By the time of incision, ET des is around 6-7. Used this way desflurane isn't any more expensive than sevo. We don't have isoflurane any more.
A man after my own heart! This is exactly what I do, though I admit to usually setting the dial to 1 L/m until I get ET of 6ish, then cut back to 0.4-0.5.
Des for almost all is my approach too. If running sevo, I bow to the lawyers and run it at 2 L/m as well.
I suspect our reasons are similar, but why do you do it this way?
Related question (to everyone): in your facility, how much does a bottle of des cost vs. a bottle of sevo?
That's a bold statement! Never noticed this, i've shied away from des because of it's long degradation time.I find I can use much less narcotics with DES.
That's a bold statement! Never noticed this, i've shied away from des because of it's long degradation time.
I think you mean 'elimination time.'
Also, why does no one use Iso? I thought it was the cheapest by far....?
just pick the better agent = DESFLURANE (as much as it pains me to say this).
TFA said:Desflurane and nitrous oxide should be restricted to cases where they may reduce morbidity and mortality over alternative drugs
It saves on gas $$$... but more importantly low flows:
3) Fast wake ups
How [do low flows] lead to faster wakeups?
PGG. You need to review your physics brah!
We did that thread too, starting at post #40.
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/the-battle-lines-are-drawn-romney-vs-obama.903749/
😀
That's nearly a close circuit depending on the size of the pt.I do sevo @ 0.4L/min btw