Financially I agree. Tough to argue the difference between 70k of debt and 140k (or whatever the difference comes out for MCG and Mercer).
But I do stand by the thread that talked about going wherever you want, despite debt. I don't know a single doctor who wasn't able to pay off the loans. If you like MCG's style better than Mercer/Emory/wherever, then that would be the place to go. Personally, I like the small school feel...
One thing that is unfortunate about Mercer, in terms of its admissions process; it is basically a state school that charges a private schools tuition! What's the deal with that?
That's a really good way of putting it and I think all of us have wondered why they (Mercer) are so eager to recruit "mission compliant" students due to "state funding" and then charge outrageous tuition fees. All I can figure is that Mercer is not subsidized as much as MCG. Still, MCG doesn't seem to care at all where you go after residency. So, that is a question that still baffles a lot of us.
I will say that it amazes me how many of my classmates got into MCG and actually chose Mercer. I'm not just talking about one or two examples either. I can't say I had that luxury. My choices were between St. Georgia, Ross, GA-PCOM, and Mercer. However, having gone to Mercer undergrad I really liked Mercer's program and would like to think I would've choosen to attend even if I had been accepted to cheaper schools.
Is it worth the extra debt to have a really excellent med school experience? Like so many opinions on this site, that is a personal choice. For me I'd say yes. No school can make medical education "easy". Regardless of where you attend, we all know that the LCME requires certain standards that all schools must meet. What varies are things like:
1. Cohesiveness of the class (do they support each other or do you have to "Watch your back" your entire four years?)
2. Support from the faculty
3. Since 3rd and 4th year are pretty much invariable at all schools, how are the basic science years presented in the curriculum (i.e. PBL, lecture, systems-based, etc).
4. Research opportunities
5. Match data/residency placement
All these are the things that separate schools. As far as Mercer goes, you'd be hard pressed to find any school anywhere that had better cohesiveness of the class or support from the faculty. I mean, the faculty invite us to their houses, lead extracurricular groups such as the cycling, swim, and book club, and of course have open door policies. They will even give small group "resources" when requested.
As far as PBL...nobody coming from undergrad really knows whether they'll like it or not, because nobody has really experienced it. I think it is a little extra work, because other than 9 hours per week of formal classroom instruction, you learn everything by yourself. Your only guidance are the "issues" set in group, and the study guide which generally tells you the topics to be covered and books where they can be found. Still, it is a great way to learn because it forces you to be an active learner instead of a passive learner.
Finally, there are few research opportunities at Mercer during the year. However, if you want to research you will not have trouble finding supportive profs, especially during the summer.