- Joined
- Dec 14, 2011
- Messages
- 496
- Reaction score
- 1
pretty sure its a simple problem, but for some reason im lost on it...
i dont understand Qvault's explanation, so if anyone can help with their own explanation itd be great
6 moles of nitrogen and an unknown amount of hydrogen are held at 40atm. The partial pressure exerted by the nitrogen is 24atm. How many moles of hydrogen are present?
also, has anyone heard of this - · For a gas, the equilibrium expression is written in terms of pressure, not concentration.
.N.2(.g..).+.3..H2(.g..)...↽.−.−.⇀.2..NH3(.g..).. --- Keq =.(..P..NH3.)2 ./ ..(.(.P.H2)3(.P.N2).).
I had selected [Nh3]^2 / [H2]^3[N2] like ive always seen and i think theres an exact same problem with the Haber Process in the Destroyer too, but i never saw the "P" in the Keq before
i dont understand Qvault's explanation, so if anyone can help with their own explanation itd be great
6 moles of nitrogen and an unknown amount of hydrogen are held at 40atm. The partial pressure exerted by the nitrogen is 24atm. How many moles of hydrogen are present?
also, has anyone heard of this - · For a gas, the equilibrium expression is written in terms of pressure, not concentration.
.N.2(.g..).+.3..H2(.g..)...↽.−.−.⇀.2..NH3(.g..).. --- Keq =.(..P..NH3.)2 ./ ..(.(.P.H2)3(.P.N2).).
I had selected [Nh3]^2 / [H2]^3[N2] like ive always seen and i think theres an exact same problem with the Haber Process in the Destroyer too, but i never saw the "P" in the Keq before
Last edited: