- Joined
- Mar 20, 2007
- Messages
- 86
- Reaction score
- 0
Last edited:
This is ridiculousThat survey is ridiculous. Vet med offers 'special challenges' for anyone who decides to take up the profession.
Question: If it is so hard for women to handle the field, then why is it that a majority of Vet school classes are female and so are a majority of clinics?
Sounds like some of these people need to pull their heads out of the sand.
This quote just makes me mad:
"Women, on average, do not have the drive and work ethic that men do. There are notable exceptions, but overall women lack work ethic."
I'll show them work ethic and then they'll be embarrassed by their noticable lack of it!
hmm...look at this:
http://www.avma.org/onlnews/javma/mar06/060301j.asp
"About 40 percent of veterinarians work 40 hours or less per week, according to the 2005 AVMA-Pfizer Business Practices Study, with 10 percent of veterinarians working less than 30 hours per week.
Some practitioners are more likely to work part time than others, though. Veterinarians who worked less than 30 hours per week were highly likely to be women, 77 percent; associates, 74 percent; and in companion animal practice, 88 percent.
The mothers
Most female part-timers choose their hours because of their children, according to preliminary findings from the 2005 AVMA Veterinary Attitudes Study."
But... nobody would *force* you to start working part time for low wages just because you had kids! I think the number of vets who are mothers working part-time is high because they *can* - it's a career that's easy to switch in and out of part-time work. Most other professional careers - including, probably, daddy's - are pretty much all-or-nothing. As a vet you have the option to bring in some salary (and keep your professional skills sharp) and still be around for your kids, rather than only having the choices of putting your career (and debt service) completely on hold vs. putting your kid in daycare its entire childhood. But it's not like having a kid puts a "don't hire full-time" restriction on your license or anything...This is a reality that has me worried about my finances. I don't know if I want to have children. I am not very interested in that--BUT if my plans ever changed I don't want to have so much debt that I am going to work at a salary that just pays my debt service.
The quotes on that article are obviously biased and inaccurate. But do vet schools feel the same way that those editors do? Is it harder for a woman to get into vet school than a man? Ive heard arguments like "woman make better vets because they have smaller hands to fit in smaller places" And "men make better vets because they have the muscles to lift up and hold dogs in place." Ive even had vets tell me that vet schoos will pick me over women because im a white male. Are vet schools really sexist and racist??
i just saw a statistic for people getting into UT in 2005. 55 were women. 15 were men.
The quotes on that article are obviously biased and inaccurate. But do vet schools feel the same way that those editors do? Is it harder for a woman to get into vet school than a man? Ive heard arguments like "woman make better vets because they have smaller hands to fit in smaller places" And "men make better vets because they have the muscles to lift up and hold dogs in place." Ive even had vets tell me that vet schoos will pick me over women because im a white male. Are vet schools really sexist and racist??
Regardless of one's standpoint on this issue, I think it's obvious that there needs to be a more proportionate ratio of men and women in veterinary medicine. 75% of women (or men like it was in decades ago) is too disproportionate. Men, and women, are uniquely capable in different ways.
If there is ANY bias, the men will have a harder time getting in, not the other way around.
A lot of the Texas guys want to work with cattle, but our GPAs tend to be lower so we get cut out before even getting a chance.
Since when are women crushing men's GPAs? Even if that's true, it's only by a little bit, which doesn't account for the huge difference. Plus, med schools are just as quantitative, and it's just about split even over there.
I personally think that the larger number of female applicants is due to an empathy that men lack. I feel that men, by socially constructed standards or otherwise, are more about influence, impact, and practicality, which leads them away from vet med. This is just my personal opinion, who knows...
Also, I think that the lack of large animal vets is due to rapid urbanization and changing values in American culture.
Harder for a woman to get into vet school? Are you crazy? Lol.
On average, 75% of veterinary classes consist of women. If there is ANY bias, the men will have a harder time getting in, not the other way around.
The only problem with this ratio is the lack of large animal veterinarians. While women do pretty well with horses, it generally takes a very strong man to effectively deal with cattle. I've met a female vet here and there that can do it, but they are few and far between. And most female vets aren't interested in cattle anyway.
So my question is.....when will this profession wake up and realize the need to admit more males in order to increase the number of practicing large animal veterinarians? Kansas State University has already posted an article over this very issue.
Who is going to be the vet that put on their hip boots (to keep the **** out of their shoes), their obstetrical gloves up to their shoulders, and wrestles the calf out of the heifer's womb when she cannot give birth by herself?
While I don't remember every word I've written in these posts, I certainly never wrote anything to suggest that men are superior to women.
I understand how many women can read this and become angry, but if you have spent a significant amount of time with cattle, you'd surely see how important it is to have a strong male veterinarian to help out. But if you haven't, then you're going to be completely enraged by my posts because you haven't been there yet.
.