- Joined
- Oct 25, 2009
- Messages
- 75
- Reaction score
- 0
This has been discussed at length in the UPenn thread [and elsewhere I am sure] but I thought it was a dialogue that could be shared amongst all post-baccers--current or alumni in one place.
As a student what track did you complete and if you had the option to go back in time would you repeat or change your mind?
The idea is that the 2 year program prepares you all the same while increasing volunteer and research exposure.
Does the applicant who took the time for more research and volunteering beat out the applicant who condensed the workload into a single year? Or is it vice versa?
As a student what track did you complete and if you had the option to go back in time would you repeat or change your mind?
The idea is that the 2 year program prepares you all the same while increasing volunteer and research exposure.
Does the applicant who took the time for more research and volunteering beat out the applicant who condensed the workload into a single year? Or is it vice versa?