Searched for threads that discuss this topic but couldn't find any. Would appreciate your input on the pros and cons of being a specialist vs "generalist". The most common reasons I can think of are compensation (for some but not all specialties. For example, pay decreases with ID), liking a specific field, wanting to be an expert in one area, not having the desire to deal with chronic conditions, etc... Are there any other reasons that medical students or those in training not aware of or perhaps should be aware of as they consider the decision to specialize? I know this question might be early coming from an MS3 but it would help shape my decision about specialty choice this year.
P.S question also applies to surgical specialties.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDIT: Thank you all for the helpful suggestions and feedback! I have been reading a book titled "how to choose a medical specialty" by Anital Taylor. So far, I've found some useful insights but I got a little confused when I came across this table in the book and found myself to be split between the two:
P.S question also applies to surgical specialties.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDIT: Thank you all for the helpful suggestions and feedback! I have been reading a book titled "how to choose a medical specialty" by Anital Taylor. So far, I've found some useful insights but I got a little confused when I came across this table in the book and found myself to be split between the two:
Attachments
Last edited: