Georgia affirms 75 million verdict against EM doc

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Higher-than-average malpractice insurance premiums in New Mexico are not entirely new. A 2020 report from the state Office of the Superintendent of Insurance showed that while premiums in the state were only slightly higher than average for internal medicine, they were substantially higher than most other states for general surgery and obstetrics and gynecology.

But those costs surged even higher after the legislature’s 2021 regular session, with passage of a bill that dramatically raised the caps on malpractice liability from $600,000 to $6 million over a five-year period — among the highest in the country. That figure can be applied to different defendants in a single case, so, for example, if a suit is brought over a surgery that involved an obstetrician, an anesthesiologist, and a hematologist, a plaintiff can ask for $18 million — a figure that doesn’t include punitive damages, which can drive the payout much higher.

New Mexico’s high caps on liability are only part of the equation, says Fred Nathan, Executive Director of Think New Mexico, a Santa Fe-based nonprofit that focuses on public policy.

“The state doesn’t cap attorney’s fees or punitive damages, and it allows lawyers to file multiple lawsuits over a single incident of alleged malpractice,” Nathan says. Plaintiffs in a successful suit can get paid in one lump sum, and because there are no caps on attorney’s fees, lawyers can keep as much of that money as they can negotiate with clients. “These sorts of factors have resulted in some extremely large verdicts against hospitals,” Nathan adds.

Several recent cases illustrate the financial stakes. In May 2023, a jury awarded a patient nearly $23 million after a botched prostate surgery that caused complications requiring at least 17 follow-up operations. A year later, a suit filed in response to a problematic hernia operation at Rehoboth McKinley Medical Center in Gallup resulted in a $68 million judgment, an amount that pushed the hospital to the brink of bankruptcy. And last month, jurors in Albuquerque awarded a patient more than $412 million for unnecessary erectile dysfunction shots administered by a clinic called NuMale Medical Center, setting a national record for these payouts.

New Mexico has the second-highest rate of malpractice suits per capita in the country, behind only Pennsylvania, according to data from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The vast majority of those cases — about 80 percent — were filed by out-of-state firms, says Troy Clark, President and CEO of the New Mexico Hospital Association. “They hire a New Mexico attorney and get a New Mexico license, but all their operations are outside,” says Clark, with most of the lawyers who file suits in New Mexico coming from firms based in Texas, Missouri and Illinois.

“We are an attraction for law firms to come in and do business in New Mexico,” he says.

Searchlight could not independently verify the numbers of malpractice cases filed by out-of-state firms, because most law offices are registered as local businesses with the New Mexico Secretary of State.

Still, it’s clear that the number of cases is substantial: During a two-year period beginning in July 2022, New Mexico courts received applications to file 233 malpractice suits, according to data compiled by the New Mexico Medical Review Board, a state commission that analyzes malpractice cases.

This flood of litigation has meant that malpractice insurance companies have consistently lost money in New Mexico. For every $100 insurers receive in premiums in this state, they pay more than $183 in claims, according to a report by Think New Mexico — by far the highest “loss ratio” in the country, and more than double the national average.
New Mexico has lost physicians at an unparalleled rate over the past five years, a change that experts attribute at least partially to malpractice exposure. According to a study by the Physicians Advocacy Institute, a nonprofit research and policy group, the state lost a total of 248 practicing physicians between 2019 and 2024 — the only state in the country to experience a net loss of doctors during that span of time.

The shortage has stressed hospital systems across New Mexico, sometimes in unexpected ways. One prominent example occurred this year at Santa Fe’s largest hospital, Christus St. Vincent Regional Medical Center. In April, administrators there outsourced its labor and delivery unit to a venture capital-backed staffing firm called OB Hospitalist Group, a company that brings in doctors from a wide geographic area to work temporary shifts.

One of that group’s first orders of business was to slash midwife salaries by 30 percent, according to employees who spoke to Searchlight. Many midwives and obstetricians left as a result, scrambling patients’ birth plans and leaving a substantial gap in services. This fall, staffing problems had become so severe that the hospital had no OB-GYN on-site for a 24-hour period
— a problem the hospital attributed to staffing “hiccups,” the Santa Fe New Mexican reported.
 
Last edited:
National medicolegal reform with reasonable caps that don’t financially wreck a physician’s livelihood would lower pricing and even out the patchwork reforms implemented in some states, but not others that leads to state by state healthcare disparities. I’m not holding my breath this will be accomplished any time soon.
 
Utah has just passed a new malpractice law which has already changed the way I practice... I really feel for the doc in GA. What a mess.
Summary of Key Provisions in House Bill 503

One of the most impactful sections, 78B-3-405.5, changes how damages against healthcare providers are assessed:

1. No Early Consideration of Medical Costs
  • During trial, the court or jury cannot consider medical expenses (e.g., hospital bills, equipment) until:
    • Liability has been established, and
    • Non-economic damages (e.g., pain and suffering) have been determined.
2. Calculating Medical Costs
  • Once liability is confirmed, compensation for medical expenses is based on:
    • The amount actually paid by the plaintiff or their insurer, or
    • The amount still owed by the plaintiff if they are uninsured.
  • The full amount of medical bills cannot be used as the basis for the award.
3. Protection of Personal Assets
  • A provider’s personal assets cannot be used to satisfy a judgment unless:
    • The provider committed intentional harm or fraud, or
    • They failed to maintain the required $1 million in malpractice coverage.
4. Restrictions on Plaintiff Statements Pre-Verdict
  • Plaintiffs may not introduce:
    • Irrelevant or inflammatory information,
    • Statements intended to pressure the provider into settling,
    • References to the provider’s personal income or assets.
5. Limits on Damages
  • Non-economic damages (e.g., pain and suffering) are capped:
    • Currently at a maximum of $450,000.
    • This does not impact awards for actual damages or punitive damages (e.g., for fraud).
6. Prelitigation Review Panels
  • Most malpractice claims must go through a review panel, consisting of:
    • An attorney, a healthcare expert, and a layperson.
  • If the panel finds the claim lacks merit, the plaintiff must file an affidavit of merit from a medical expert to proceed.
  • Parties can bypass the panel only with mutual consent.
7. Affidavit of Merit
  • Filing a false or baseless affidavit may result in the plaintiff or their attorney being found liable for the defendant’s legal costs, deterring frivolous lawsuits.
8. Attorney Fees
  • If a claim is found to lack merit and the plaintiff loses in court, they may be ordered to pay the provider’s attorney fees and legal costs.
 
You know what? F Georgia.

I'm somewhat surprised people are still making judgements based off news articles as we all know there is always much more to the story.

"She has not said whether she wants Smith removed from life support" carries quite a bit of weight in that story and is buried pretty deep.
 
I'm somewhat surprised people are still making judgements based off news articles as we all know there is always much more to the story.

"She has not said whether she wants Smith removed from life support" carries quite a bit of weight in that story and is buried pretty deep.

What they would choose is irrelevant to the argument that they should have the right to choose.
 
Higher-than-average malpractice insurance premiums in New Mexico are not entirely new. A 2020 report from the state Office of the Superintendent of Insurance showed that while premiums in the state were only slightly higher than average for internal medicine, they were substantially higher than most other states for general surgery and obstetrics and gynecology.

But those costs surged even higher after the legislature’s 2021 regular session, with passage of a bill that dramatically raised the caps on malpractice liability from $600,000 to $6 million over a five-year period — among the highest in the country. That figure can be applied to different defendants in a single case, so, for example, if a suit is brought over a surgery that involved an obstetrician, an anesthesiologist, and a hematologist, a plaintiff can ask for $18 million — a figure that doesn’t include punitive damages, which can drive the payout much higher.

New Mexico’s high caps on liability are only part of the equation, says Fred Nathan, Executive Director of Think New Mexico, a Santa Fe-based nonprofit that focuses on public policy.

“The state doesn’t cap attorney’s fees or punitive damages, and it allows lawyers to file multiple lawsuits over a single incident of alleged malpractice,” Nathan says. Plaintiffs in a successful suit can get paid in one lump sum, and because there are no caps on attorney’s fees, lawyers can keep as much of that money as they can negotiate with clients. “These sorts of factors have resulted in some extremely large verdicts against hospitals,” Nathan adds.

Several recent cases illustrate the financial stakes. In May 2023, a jury awarded a patient nearly $23 million after a botched prostate surgery that caused complications requiring at least 17 follow-up operations. A year later, a suit filed in response to a problematic hernia operation at Rehoboth McKinley Medical Center in Gallup resulted in a $68 million judgment, an amount that pushed the hospital to the brink of bankruptcy. And last month, jurors in Albuquerque awarded a patient more than $412 million for unnecessary erectile dysfunction shots administered by a clinic called NuMale Medical Center, setting a national record for these payouts.

New Mexico has the second-highest rate of malpractice suits per capita in the country, behind only Pennsylvania, according to data from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The vast majority of those cases — about 80 percent — were filed by out-of-state firms, says Troy Clark, President and CEO of the New Mexico Hospital Association. “They hire a New Mexico attorney and get a New Mexico license, but all their operations are outside,” says Clark, with most of the lawyers who file suits in New Mexico coming from firms based in Texas, Missouri and Illinois.

“We are an attraction for law firms to come in and do business in New Mexico,” he says.

Searchlight could not independently verify the numbers of malpractice cases filed by out-of-state firms, because most law offices are registered as local businesses with the New Mexico Secretary of State.

Still, it’s clear that the number of cases is substantial: During a two-year period beginning in July 2022, New Mexico courts received applications to file 233 malpractice suits, according to data compiled by the New Mexico Medical Review Board, a state commission that analyzes malpractice cases.

This flood of litigation has meant that malpractice insurance companies have consistently lost money in New Mexico. For every $100 insurers receive in premiums in this state, they pay more than $183 in claims, according to a report by Think New Mexico — by far the highest “loss ratio” in the country, and more than double the national average.
New Mexico has lost physicians at an unparalleled rate over the past five years, a change that experts attribute at least partially to malpractice exposure. According to a study by the Physicians Advocacy Institute, a nonprofit research and policy group, the state lost a total of 248 practicing physicians between 2019 and 2024 — the only state in the country to experience a net loss of doctors during that span of time.

The shortage has stressed hospital systems across New Mexico, sometimes in unexpected ways. One prominent example occurred this year at Santa Fe’s largest hospital, Christus St. Vincent Regional Medical Center. In April, administrators there outsourced its labor and delivery unit to a venture capital-backed staffing firm called OB Hospitalist Group, a company that brings in doctors from a wide geographic area to work temporary shifts.

One of that group’s first orders of business was to slash midwife salaries by 30 percent, according to employees who spoke to Searchlight. Many midwives and obstetricians left as a result, scrambling patients’ birth plans and leaving a substantial gap in services. This fall, staffing problems had become so severe that the hospital had no OB-GYN on-site for a 24-hour period
— a problem the hospital attributed to staffing “hiccups,” the Santa Fe New Mexican reported.
I also found this article interesting

 
What they would choose is irrelevant to the argument that they should have the right to choose.
Again, I’ll choose to not make any judgements from a single article with a high likelihood of not having all the facts of the case.
 
Again, I’ll choose to not make any judgements from a single article with a high likelihood of not having all the facts of the case.
Again due to their restrictive abortion law that caused this issue in the first place, F Georgia.
 
Again, I’ll choose to not make any judgements from a single article with a high likelihood of not having all the facts of the case.

This is a widely publicized case with hundreds of news reports. There is no reason to presume people are making judgements based off of one article. The fundamental premise that the family is being denied the choice to withdraw care do to interpretation of the state's abortion laws is not disputed in any of the debate around this case. The statement you claim carries so much weight is still entirely irrelevant to the actual debate around the case.
 
This is a widely publicized case with hundreds of news reports. There is no reason to presume people are making judgements based off of one article. The fundamental premise that the family is being denied the choice to withdraw care do to interpretation of the state's abortion laws is not disputed in any of the debate around this case. The statement you claim carries so much weight is still entirely irrelevant to the actual debate around the case.
This is the first article I’ve seen. Has the medical team treating her put out specifics with regards to the case? My guess is no so I’ll reserve judgement and let things play out. Not that me having an opinion one way or the other would change anything.
 


Story seems suspect. Notice the vagueness on whether family asked for the woman to be taken off of life support.

Here's what I bet happened, and I would put money on it:
The family requested patient to NOT be taken off of life support after her initial presentation. Now that the 20 week ultrasound showed hydrocephalus, they changed their mind, and the hospital is now in a tough spot after keeping her on life support for the last 3 months at the families request.

Any time so many details are left out, you have to think about it. Just like the cases of 'ERs refusing pregnant patients out and forcing them into the street' bull**** that was in the news last year.
 
Story seems suspect. Notice the vagueness on whether family asked for the woman to be taken off of life support.

Here's what I bet happened, and I would put money on it:
The family requested patient to NOT be taken off of life support after her initial presentation. Now that the 20 week ultrasound showed hydrocephalus, they changed their mind, and the hospital is now in a tough spot after keeping her on life support for the last 3 months at the families request.

Any time so many details are left out, you have to think about it. Just like the cases of 'ERs refusing pregnant patients out and forcing them into the street' bull**** that was in the news last year.

Previously placing a patient on life support has never been an impediment to stopping life support when the family later changes their mind. In fact, significant effort is often spent trying to convince families to let patients die. You're just describing "the law is preventing the family from having a choice to withdraw care because the patient is pregnant" in more words. No one is even blaming the hospital, they are blaming the law.
 
I hit 405 on bench last year

This year I strained my back bending over

40 is hard

It's also time for me to reassess priorities. Wife isn't even remotely impressed by benching (wrongfully so). Oldest kid is starting to go with me at least, albeit in the kid zone.

Lots of stretching in the future. Not nearly as fun as the last decade but like you weight is starting to matter less than not hurting myself lol
Tore my labrum 12 years ago. I max at 185 bench now on a good day, incline military press at 45 hurts..

I agree, getting old sucks.

That said, I’ve heard from numerous fitness gurus that bench isn’t really a valuable exercise anyhow..
 
Tore my labrum 12 years ago. I max at 185 bench now on a good day, incline military press at 45 hurts..

I agree, getting old sucks.

That said, I’ve heard from numerous fitness gurus that bench isn’t really a valuable exercise anyhow..
Definitely least important of the big 3 by far.
 
I've heard from numerous fitness gurus that bench isn’t really a valuable exercise anyhow..

Oh

I strongly disagree

Just as smokers smoke for stress relief, or religious folk pray, my inner peace comes from bench

It is the calmest I achieve myself for the entire week

Whatever it does to ravage my AC joint is made up by the mental health benefit
 
Oh

I strongly disagree

Just as smokers smoke for stress relief, or religious folk pray, my inner peace comes from bench

It is the calmest I achieve myself for the entire week

Whatever it does to ravage my AC joint is made up by the mental health benefit
I'm one of those weird ones that gets most of my enjoyment from leg day - specifically deadlifts and sled drags, lol
 
Oh

I strongly disagree

Just as smokers smoke for stress relief, or religious folk pray, my inner peace comes from bench

It is the calmest I achieve myself for the entire week

Whatever it does to ravage my AC joint is made up by the mental health benefit

Bench is for bragging rights (including internal bragging rights; it's my favorite too)
Deadlifts are for glory.
Squat is for the feelsgoodman. I wish I had longer legs.
 
Tore my labrum 12 years ago. I max at 185 bench now on a good day, incline military press at 45 hurts..

I agree, getting old sucks.

That said, I’ve heard from numerous fitness gurus that bench isn’t really a valuable exercise anyhow..

Worse ROM and less shoulder friendly compared to a 30-45 incline db press. The flat bb bench is also notorious for pec tears. Depends on your goals. Bragging rights or development?
 
Worse ROM and less shoulder friendly compared to a 30-45 incline db press. The flat bb bench is also notorious for pec tears. Depends on your goals. Bragging rights or development?
At this point in my life, maintenance.. Incline DB press hurts too, but not as bad..
 
Worse ROM and less shoulder friendly compared to a 30-45 incline db press. The flat bb bench is also notorious for pec tears. Depends on your goals. Bragging rights or development?
People on the bench more often than not have horrible form, so not surprised they end up with tears - rarely do I see good arch, with shoulders tucked in, body tight, barbell lifted up on a J shaped curve etc, which helps generate more force and reduce injuries.
 
People on the bench more often than not have horrible form, so not surprised they end up with tears - rarely do I see good arch, with shoulders tucked in, body tight, barbell lifted up on a J shaped curve etc, which helps generate more force and reduce injuries.

So much this.
Shoulders BACK.
 
Top