Last edited:
Same here. I can rush (which makes me miss questions) or spend the extra time and not get to the last passage. I had an evaluation done for ADHD and I applied for extra time. When I was reading over the requirements, I really thought they were too strict. It said, "there has to be a pattern of scores below the 25th percentile" or something like that. But if we were really struggling that much, we wouldn't be trying to go to medical school in the first place...
The MCAT requires a lot more reading than other tests and under stricter timing conditions. The whole thing is basically a reading comprehension test, which makes it difficult for anyone with ADHD or problems focusing.
Based on what I was told by someone who applied for extra time for a learning disability, you have to provide documentation that basically shows you are an unsuitable candidate for becoming a doctor. Be glad that all they send out are denial letters and that they don't outright ban people from applying to medical school.
Say you do get extra time for the MCAT. There is no guarantee you will get extra time in medical school or on the licensing exams. And then what types of accommodations will you expect when you have real live patients sitting in front of you?
I could see the difference if the Disability is correctable with Ritalin or something to that effect,
Mine would be correctable with Ritalin, but I developed epilepsy a few years ago and now most ADHD meds will give me seizures.
Based on what I was told by someone who applied for extra time for a learning disability, you have to provide documentation that basically shows you are an unsuitable candidate for becoming a doctor. Be glad that all they send out are denial letters and that they don't outright ban people from applying to medical school.
Say you do get extra time for the MCAT. There is no guarantee you will get extra time in medical school or on the licensing exams. And then what types of accommodations will you expect when you have real live patients sitting in front of you?
Based on what I was told by someone who applied for extra time for a learning disability, you have to provide documentation that basically shows you are an unsuitable candidate for becoming a doctor. Be glad that all they send out are denial letters and that they don't outright ban people from applying to medical school.
Say you do get extra time for the MCAT. There is no guarantee you will get extra time in medical school or on the licensing exams. And then what types of accommodations will you expect when you have real live patients sitting in front of you?
The MCAT is different from testing in college classes and other standardized tests. What other tests force you to read so many passages under such time constraints? Most tests in college have short answers, essays, and individual (unrelated) multiple choice questions and they last an hour or so. The MCAT is a test of your reading speed and your ability to sustain concentration on reading for hours at a time along with everything else, which is the exact reason the test is difficult for anyone with ADHD or a Learning Disability.
The MCAT is also not real life. A lot of the material on the MCAT is irrelevant to what you do as a doctor. You don't need the mechanism for the Wolff-Kishner reaction when you're working in the ER and you don't need to know whether the image created by a converging lens is upright or inverted. In medical school, you learn from areas more specific to medicine - physiology, biochemistry, etc, so performance on the MCAT is not the same as performance on the USMLE.
Whether you like the MCAT or not, the fact is that everyone has trouble with the time limits. I'll guarantee you that with just an extra 10 to 15 minutes I could have scored significantly higher. I have never been to a doctor to be diagnosed, but everyone who knows me would be surprised if I were not ADHD. But I am not asking to be judged as an ADHD person, I asking to be judged as a med school applicant.
The point is that everyone has challenges to overcome. The MCAT should be level ground. Whether it is a good test to judge by is beside the point. The issue is that we are judged by it, so therefore we ought to be judged evenly. Those people who play the victim game and get an advantage thereby are not admirable. The fact that different conditions were used are reported along with the scores, and I hope that the adcoms take into account that the applicant is a victimology gamer.
Whether you like the MCAT or not, the fact is that everyone has trouble with the time limits. I'll guarantee you that with just an extra 10 to 15 minutes I could have scored significantly higher. I have never been to a doctor to be diagnosed, but everyone who knows me would be surprised if I were not ADHD. But I am not asking to be judged as an ADHD person, I asking to be judged as a med school applicant.
The point is that everyone has challenges to overcome. The MCAT should be level ground. Whether it is a good test to judge by is beside the point. The issue is that we are judged by it, so therefore we ought to be judged evenly. Those people who play the victim game and get an advantage thereby are not admirable. The fact that different conditions were used are reported along with the scores, and I hope that the adcoms take into account that the applicant is a victimology gamer.
It's not about playing the victim - it's about recognizing that the MCAT under standard conditions can make the problem of processing speed reflect in your score, rather than your knowledge or ability which are the very things the MCAT aims to test.
I sympathize with your point of view but I disagree with this statement. The MCAT is not a test of knowledge - your performance is only partially reflected by your mastery of content. One of the biggest parts of the test is how well you can process information under pressure, and the greatest form of applied pressure is the time constraint.
However, I am not against the idea of allowing people extra time if their disabilities meet rigorous guidelines. But it should not be easy, and I applaud the AAMC for being very selective about it. IMO, those scores would be judged much differently. I guess it would depend how much extra time is given, but if I'm the judge I'd give someone who did not have extra time a handicap of at least 6 points vs. someone who had extra time. In other words, I'm not sure if it's in your best interest to pursue a time exemption because a 33 with extra time is less impressive than a 27 with no extra time.
If you have an epileptic seizure during the test I can see the need for extra time.
If you're simply claiming ADHD, you should probably learn to deal with it BEFORE you're in medical school. There are non-amphetamine like drugs that you can treat ADHD. Speaking from experience, learn to get into a routine and be over maticulous with things and you can learn to cope without drugs.
People actually find my ability to multitask fairly impressive, and I attribute this to the fact that I have ADHD.