Give it up for the engineers!

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Originally posted by OrthoFixation
Thackl,
What was TTU's position on engr GPA? Did they add any points?

I don't know what thier official stance is. The school statitics show the majority of students there coming form the natural sciences though. We discussed my backgound, but I wouldn't say a big deal was made of it.

Did you work for TI or Raytheon (sp?)? I used to go up there all the time to work with product and burn-in engineers (I worked for 3M's electronics testing/handling/protection division on high speed interfaces for test).
 
I worked for TI in 1989 before Raytheon came into the picture. Our contract was eventually lost to Martin Marietta. Now, all TI wants to do is design & mfg chips. I enjoy blowing things up, so that is a shame. After graduation, I decided not to go back to TI as it seemed that ME's were the red headed step children to all the EE's (ME=8% of engr's in 1989).

TI is building a $3B (yes Billion) chip facility in Richardson adjacent to the UTD campus and Hwy 190 (G.Bush tollway).

I thought the chip technology was way cool and still remember the tiny wires connecting chips to the external circuitry. I think they were 1 micron thick . . . barely visible to the naked eye if you had great vision and squinted just right. They had many women soldering these connections under microscopes. One of my friends who designed the chipset put his initials in the gold plating and they were on every .25"^2 chip if you knew where to look!

Then there was the day that a lab engineer dipped a live mouse in liquid nitrogen (80 deg K boiling point) instantly freezing him. He shattered the mouse against the wall, which subsequently returned to room temp and stunk to high heaven. The engr nearly lost his job over that one. We were always pulling pranks on one another, like freezing the cloth chairs, etc. He just took it a little too far.

TI is a great company to work for. Very family oriented. Only Dow Chemical impressed me more back in 1989 on the interview circuit.
 
Being a chip guy, I can't really sympathize. Blowing stuff up is fun too, as long as it's not alive........
 
Originally posted by thackl
Being a chip guy, I can't really sympathize. Blowing stuff up is fun too, as long as it's not alive........

Yes, that was a sick event. I always said if I went military that destroying key targets would be a hoot, like bridges, dams, etc. Find the weak point and just add C4.

You being a chip guy makes sense since you reside in the Silicon Valley of the South. Lots of computer industry in Austin.
 
Industrial Engineers are not real engineers. Just thought I would let everyone know.
 
It's all about ChemE, baby! Top of the list on the first post. ChemE's learn biology, physics, and chemistry, plus they're required to have the same basis in material science, electrical engineering, and programming that all engineers need to a small degree. I picked ChemE because it had the broadest range of both engineering and natural science in the curriculum. Plus, I've compared curricula, and it seems to me that ChemE's take more lab classes than other engineers (although that likely varies from school to school). My major in molecular biology pales in comparison to ChemE in terms of overall coolness. And in the BioE class I took, it seemed like everyone in the class who was a BioE major felt like they'd been suckered into taking a major that had ****ty job prospects. I don't hear those worries in my ChemE classes.

Just this Monday, I mentioned that I wish I knew how to use a slide rule to my boss. He got one out of his office and showed it to me, and how to use it. It was a weird one, because it was round, but the principle seems to make sense. All it is is a bunch of numbers on a log-scale axis in parallel. You set both sliding parts at zero, slide the first part to the first number you'll be multipying, and then with that first one in lock step with the second, you slide it to the second number to multiply. It works by the idea that log[a*b] = log[a] + log. That is, it adds logarithmically to give the product. Pretty cool stuff, IMNO (in my nerdy opinion).😀
 
Top