LloydInSpace
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2021
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
Senior resident here.
Have been working this block with a resident who was identified to me as struggling thus far in residency, and unfortunately I have not seen any improvement in their general work-flow, knowledge base, or ward management since that time.
It is coming time for us to give feedback to the site leads and committee regarding our interns and I am very conflicted about how to approach this. Of course, the committee is aware of some of the issues, given they provided me with a heads up prior to starting, but I am unsure of how much or how detailed to be.
I really feel for this resident and think they are a lovely person, who has unfortunate personal circumstances that have lead to them having difficulties in residency.
In spite of this, I have several major concerns and would honestly say that in my eyes this intern has failed to meet the requirements to pass the rotation.
They are generally very unreliable (not doing tasks asked of them explicitly first thing in the morning), slow to round (unable to see 3-4 patients daily before we run the list), and don't implement the feedback I have been giving them throughout the block.
I have really tried to provide them with every opportunity to show growth, and given informal feedback frequently to help them see where some gaps are, as well as suggestions on what to do going forward.
For example, when reviewing a consult/admission, I will remind them to mention the absence of red flag features concerning for X diagnosis, as that is a key thing we want the listener and reader to gather when they hear the story. They nod and seem to get it. When I listen in on their review with the attending, these changes will not be made and information not added. Then the attending asks "well what about red flag diagnosis" and it's a real facepalm moment for me.
They also fail to understand (despite me saying it several times) that sick patients need to be seen first! When rounding, they have repeatedly seen our patients waiting for facility placement, and then when we run the list have told me they haven't seen the acute patients who are hypotensive and septic!!
I have taken to double rounding on their patients because I am so concerned about what may be falling through the cracks, which is leaving me short on time to do other tasks.
I have written down my feedback to help myself organize it when the time comes, but also feel guilty for having such overwhelmingly negative feedback. I know for the sake of patient safety and transparency I should bring these concerns forward, but want to give this resident every chance to be successful and improve.
Has anyone else been in a similar situation? And if so, how did you present the feedback and what did you choose to omit [if anything]?
Have been working this block with a resident who was identified to me as struggling thus far in residency, and unfortunately I have not seen any improvement in their general work-flow, knowledge base, or ward management since that time.
It is coming time for us to give feedback to the site leads and committee regarding our interns and I am very conflicted about how to approach this. Of course, the committee is aware of some of the issues, given they provided me with a heads up prior to starting, but I am unsure of how much or how detailed to be.
I really feel for this resident and think they are a lovely person, who has unfortunate personal circumstances that have lead to them having difficulties in residency.
In spite of this, I have several major concerns and would honestly say that in my eyes this intern has failed to meet the requirements to pass the rotation.
They are generally very unreliable (not doing tasks asked of them explicitly first thing in the morning), slow to round (unable to see 3-4 patients daily before we run the list), and don't implement the feedback I have been giving them throughout the block.
I have really tried to provide them with every opportunity to show growth, and given informal feedback frequently to help them see where some gaps are, as well as suggestions on what to do going forward.
For example, when reviewing a consult/admission, I will remind them to mention the absence of red flag features concerning for X diagnosis, as that is a key thing we want the listener and reader to gather when they hear the story. They nod and seem to get it. When I listen in on their review with the attending, these changes will not be made and information not added. Then the attending asks "well what about red flag diagnosis" and it's a real facepalm moment for me.
They also fail to understand (despite me saying it several times) that sick patients need to be seen first! When rounding, they have repeatedly seen our patients waiting for facility placement, and then when we run the list have told me they haven't seen the acute patients who are hypotensive and septic!!
I have taken to double rounding on their patients because I am so concerned about what may be falling through the cracks, which is leaving me short on time to do other tasks.
I have written down my feedback to help myself organize it when the time comes, but also feel guilty for having such overwhelmingly negative feedback. I know for the sake of patient safety and transparency I should bring these concerns forward, but want to give this resident every chance to be successful and improve.
Has anyone else been in a similar situation? And if so, how did you present the feedback and what did you choose to omit [if anything]?