gogo: new curriculum

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Jim Henderson

Full Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 22, 1999
Messages
415
Reaction score
3
How many allopathic schools use the regular lecture-based
cirriculum as opposed to the ones using organ system based
learning or even group learning (like at Harvard)? Also which
one is better, opinions please!

Members don't see this ad.
 
Most use a combined system, with didactic lectures and case/group
based learning. Rarely are there purely traditional schools or
pure case-based learning schools anymore. Historically, the pure
case-based learning schools don't score quite as high on the USMLE
as their counterparts... but who's gonna hold that against a
Harvard grad?


Thanks!


Jim Henderson, MD of Medicalstudent.net
 
I believe most medical schools these days have reorganized their curriculum around organ systems in a block manner rather than traditional Biochemistry, Physiology, etc., classes.

I'm not sure what learning in a traditional curriculum is like, but if it's anything like college, then I'm glad someone developed the organ systems approach! I'm going into my second day of lectures as a first-year and think it's a neat way to have the information sort of "pre-synthesized" for you.

Tim of New York City.
 
Top