Dismiss Notice
Last chance to give your feedback! Fill out the 2019 SDN Member Survey to let us know what's important to you (and win prizes!)

Got feedback for article

Discussion in 'Psychology [Psy.D. / Ph.D.]' started by PsychResearch, Jul 21, 2011.

  1. PsychResearch

    2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi!

    I got feedback for an article with a revise and resubmit decision. In my paper, I used self and parent report data and stated that this is a strenght/contribution of the study. When past research used multiple informants they use X informant to measure Y construct, Z informant to measure Q construct. In my dataset, I have self- and parent-report of the same constructs. I know why it is important to use multiple informants I just don't know how to answer this question:

    Why is separate analysis of self- and parent-report data important relative to approaches that have combined information from such informants?


    Any ideas?
     
  2. PerhapsMaybeOk

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2011
    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    7
    I'll need a co-authorship in order to answer this one :love:
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. Huxwell

    Huxwell Ph.D. Student

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Psychology Student
    Well, the subject area is outside of my expertise, but if you're saying that some aspect of your methodology is a contribution/strength, you need to provide a rationale for it. Just saying "this hasn't been done before" is not enough; you need to convince the reader why it is a worthwhile way of looking at the construct. Otherwise a reader might think that you are presenting the data in this manner because you couldn't get the desired results using the "normal" method.
     
  4. wigflip

    2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,549
    Likes Received:
    5
    It certainly sounds like your approach is a strength. Is your methodology unique? I wonder if others have done likewise and may have written about this.
     

Share This Page