1. The SDN iPhone App is back and free through November! Get it today and please post a review on the App Store!
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice

Got feedback for article

Discussion in 'Psychology [Psy.D. / Ph.D.]' started by PsychResearch, Jul 21, 2011.

  1. PsychResearch

    2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi!

    I got feedback for an article with a revise and resubmit decision. In my paper, I used self and parent report data and stated that this is a strenght/contribution of the study. When past research used multiple informants they use X informant to measure Y construct, Z informant to measure Q construct. In my dataset, I have self- and parent-report of the same constructs. I know why it is important to use multiple informants I just don't know how to answer this question:

    Why is separate analysis of self- and parent-report data important relative to approaches that have combined information from such informants?


    Any ideas?
     
  2. Note: SDN Members do not see this ad.

  3. PerhapsMaybeOk

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2011
    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    7
    I'll need a co-authorship in order to answer this one :love:
     
  4. Huxwell

    Huxwell Ph.D. Student

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Psychology Student
    Well, the subject area is outside of my expertise, but if you're saying that some aspect of your methodology is a contribution/strength, you need to provide a rationale for it. Just saying "this hasn't been done before" is not enough; you need to convince the reader why it is a worthwhile way of looking at the construct. Otherwise a reader might think that you are presenting the data in this manner because you couldn't get the desired results using the "normal" method.
     
  5. wigflip

    2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,549
    Likes Received:
    5
    It certainly sounds like your approach is a strength. Is your methodology unique? I wonder if others have done likewise and may have written about this.
     

Share This Page