

IAMS said:If so, cover your mouth when you cough and sneeze 😡 - that's how it spreads.
Over 1000 cases so far in the midwest - mostly in Iowa. Impact has largely been among people in late teens, early 20's - so pre-meds are prime-breeding ground. 😛 🙁
riceman04 said:cough cough...whoops I forgot to cover my mouth or wash my hands 😀
mshheaddoc said:How many people didn't get the vaccine? And why the hell not?
I don't really understand this. All this stupid debate over the MMR vaccine.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...apr20,1,548746.story?coll=la-headlines-nationA significant number of college-age students in Iowa have not had their second dose of vaccine because they entered school before the requirement for a second dose took effect in the early 1990s.
Iowa does not require students entering college to have a second dose of the vaccine.
The federal government now recommends the vaccine at 12 to 15 months and 4 to 6 years of age.
There is no evidence that immunity conferred by the vaccine diminishes with time, but the vaccine still fails to protect 10% of the people who receive the recommended two doses, Gerberding said.n
Did you have both sets of it?isobel said:um, i don't think it works all that well so don't get into such a huff. i got the MMR vaccine and i still managed to get the mumps when i was 8.
mshheaddoc said:Did you have both sets of it?
And reason I get in a huff, is those people unable to get the vaccine due to being immunocompressed are those at risk here. Since mostly young adults have the outbreak right now, that is something I'm concerned about.
You are right about the failure rate, but its only 10% as I quoted above. And also because the 2nd booster wasn't recommened at the time.
mshheaddoc said:Wow - 3 doses ... That is an interesting case. Did you have a severe or mild case ? Just curious 😳
mshheaddoc said:Thanks for the link! I've been looking for stats like this on this outbreak (I'm interested in doing review research on vaccines over the next few years). I agree I find it funny that 66% were vaccinated for it. I wonder if they now need boosters for this as obviously the 2 booster didn't work for everyone.
Wow - 3 doses ... That is an interesting case. Did you have a severe or mild case ? Just curious 😳
Vaccine Ingredientsmshheaddoc said:How many people didn't get the vaccine? And why the hell not?
I don't really understand this. All this stupid debate over the MMR vaccine.
Because they are being injected with the disease.mshheaddoc said:... why are the young getting the mumps?
ForeverStudent said:Because they are being injected with the disease.
mshheaddoc said:I'm not going to go off on my beliefs of vaccines ... but no one can contest that the reason why some ID's are still around are due the fact that there is a susceptibility out there and without vaccines that puts our lives in greater risk of epidemics and/or pandemics.
Exactly. Your beliefs!mshheaddoc said:I'm not going to go off on my beliefs of vaccines ... but no one can contest that the reason why some ID's are still around are due the fact that there is a susceptibility out there and without vaccines that puts our lives in greater risk of epidemics and/or pandemics.
Please, back that up with some data.browniegirl86 said:Yes, thank you for contributing to such public health crises as infant deaths from pertussis (from unvaccinated adult carriers), birth defects from rubella, and the spread of hepatitis B.
👎
You are correct. There are none, but many that prove they cause irreparable damage and even death.mshheaddoc said:Good for you ... its a belief because you can't change people's mind. People like yourself.
Pandemics ... we've had the same amount. Is there statistical data that PROVES vaccines are effective?
You can read? I suggest reading the Centers for Disease Control.mshheaddoc said:Hmmm ... polio? measles? mumps? rubella? menigitis? hep B? I don't know. Guess not. Feel free to show us your publications stating otherwise.
OMG! Please tell me you are smarter than that! There is NO such thing as eradication of disease! It's the basic principle of energy.mshheaddoc said:helping countries eradicate these diseases.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5450a3.htmForeverStudent said:Please, back that up with some data.
Is that the BEST defense you can come up with? My poor choice of words? The best goal we all have eradication, its a high goal but maybe it can happen.ForeverStudent said:OMG! Please tell me you are smarter than that! There is NO such thing as eradication of disease! It's the basic principle of energy.
WHAT THE HELL are you talking about?ForeverStudent said:You can read? I suggest reading the Centers for Disease Control.
Read the VIS, you know, the little insert packet that comes with the shot. You have read them, right? 🙄
You do know the what energy is, right? You do know that diseases will always exist, right? It is impossible to kill off all diseases, they will merely mutate into newer ones.mshheaddoc said:Is that the BEST defense you can come up with? My poor choice of words? The best goal we all have eradication, its a high goal but maybe it can happen.
What do you think it did to your body?mshheaddoc said:And apparently it WORKS! 😱
No, they have not. Show me the studies you think you are referring to, please.mshheaddoc said:I was stating that these diseases have been clinically proven in a reduction of cases with vaccinations.
The ONLY way to prevent disease is not to get it in the first place.mshheaddoc said:Not my point. But thanks.
My point is trying to prevent people from getting sick, passing on these diseases and dying from them. The lower the amount of people the better, especially if they die/deformities unnecessarily if there are medicines/vaccines out there to help them. We will always have the "NEW" virus, I'm not naive. Don't play me for a 20 y/o pre-med.
I am fully aware to how diseases work and how we can't eradicate "new" ones but why can't we control the ones we understand how they operate?
ForeverStudent said:Please, back that up with some data.
😕ForeverStudent said:The ONLY way to prevent disease is not to get it in the first place.
How is injecting a disease into the body preventing disease? You make absolutely no sense. And, no, you sound more like an 8 yr old kid.

ForeverStudent said:The ONLY way to prevent disease is not to get it in the first place.
How is injecting a disease into the body preventing disease? You make absolutely no sense. And, no, you sound more like an 8 yr old kid.
Biavax
Rubella and Mumps Virus Vaccine Live
Merck & Co, Inc.
1-800-672-6372
produced using neomycin, sorbitol, hydrolized gelatin
medium: human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
DPT
Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Pertussis Vaccine Adsorbed
SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals
1-800-366-8900 ext. 5231
produced using aluminum phosphate, formaldehyde, ammonium sulfate, washed sheep red blood cells, glycerol, sodium chloride, thimerosal medium: porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
You need to get your head out of the sand. Grow up.Ammonium Sulfate:
EDF Suspected - gastrointestinal or liver toxicant, neurotoxicant,
respiratory toxicant
Formaldehyde:
EDF Recognized - carcinogen
Suspected - gastrointestinal or liver toxicant, immunotoxicant,
neurotoxicant, reproductive toxicant, respiratory toxicant
skin or sense organ toxicant
More hazardous than most chemicals in 5 out of 12 ranking systems on
at
least 8 federal regulatory lists Ranked as one of the most hazardous
compounds (worst 10%) to ecosystems and human health
At least someone paid attention in micro - and also can properly use the internet 👍browniegirl86 said:
ForeverStudent said:The best defense against disease in the human body is a healthy imuune system.
From the link I provided earlier...
You need to get your head out of the sand. Grow up.
browniegirl86 said:Pertussis: http://www.pertussis.com/digest/index.html (click a state, read digest, especially "further analysis")
Rubella birth defects: http://www.cdc.gov/nip/diseases/rubella/vac-chart.htm
Hep B: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hepatitis/resource/PDFs/HBV_Prevet_Brochure.pdf
ForeverStudent said:The ONLY way to prevent disease is not to get it in the first place.
How is injecting a disease into the body preventing disease? You make absolutely no sense. And, no, you sound more like an 8 yr old kid.
Thanks for the good laugh ForeverStudent!!! I mean seriously, you have to be f-ing around here. You need to seriously take an Immunology or Microbiology course. You will have to if you ever plan on being in med school. mustangsally65 said:This thread wasn't about whether or not someone should get vaccinated. It was about the effectiveness of the vaccine and any other factors that may have affected the young adults who are getting the mumps. Can we please just have a normal discussion like normal adults do? 😛
I think vaccines are an interesting topic and it would be nice if people would stop attacking other people. 😡
So do you guys think the vaccine requirements will be changed in response to these recent cases of the mumps?
I was never vaccinated and have never been sick, tyvm.browniegirl86 said:Since you don't care how much data we give you, this "conversation" is over.
Good luck with your immune system.
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/quotes4.htm
We are told that "before the MMR was introduced in 1988 there were 'tens of thousands of cases'. How would anyone know? Before 1988 mumps was not a notifiable disease and 30-40 percent of people with mumps don't have any symptoms (10).
Mumps disease is caused by a virus. Humans are the only known natural host. Subclinical infections are com*mon. The peak age of incidence is five to nine years. One attack of clinical or subclinical mumps confers lasting immunity and second attacks are most unusual (12). The incubation period is an average of 18 days.
Appropriately managed, clinical mumps (ie mumps with symptoms so you know you've got it) is not a dan*gerous disease. It is the complications that are dangerous. How do you avoid complications? Common sense.