Evil Ibanez is back.
1. GRADED POTENTIAL IS NOT JUST SEEN IN CASE OF NEURONS, but also POST-SYNAPTIC TERMINAL OF A NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION
(MUSCLE, that is.)
2.
END PLATE POTENTIAL IS A GRADED POTENTIAL. AND NOT ACTION POTENTIAL. MANY MEPPs (Miniature EPP) ARE GENERATED ON THE MEMBRANE (POST-SYNAPTIC membrane) and together they produce EPP.
3. The summation of MANY MEPPs at post-synaptic terminal/membrane will cause depolarization in the muscle cell. And now this depolarization will pass onto adjacent muscle tissue and so forth creating
AN ACTION POTENTIAL.
(Only if the EPP generated is more than the threshold value of a membrane, an action potential is produced. ALL OR NONE.)
Having said that and moving towards answering the question... I think I should list the keywords used in the question that will help us answer it:
MUSCLE CELL
REGULARLY
Now, the option 2 says "Graded potential" (re-read my point 1 and 2).
GRADED POTENTIAL develops only at the POST-SYNAPTIC TERMINAL; AND NOT THE ENTIRE MUSCLE TISSUE.
But if the question was framed in a way, say,
"The transmission of impulses from motor neurons at neuromuscular junction regularly produces: " and if the options given were like
a Action Potential
b Graded Potential
c Hyperpolarization
d Hypopolarization
In such a case the answer will be "GRADED POTENTIAL" . Because MEPPs are REGULARLY PRODUCED and the summation of MEPPs (EPP) can be below the threshold level. IF below the threshold, there will be no Action Potential generated (like say for example in some neural disorder/degeneration/disease state).
AND ACTION POTENTIAL IS NOT PRODUCED AT POST SYNAPTIC TERMINAL OF A NM JUNCTION.
Moving on, the option 3 says: Hyperpolarization. Hyperpolarization is NOT A REGULARLY occuring phenomenon at NM junction. Though if the NT secreted at the NM junction is an inhibitory one then it results in
Hyperpolarization and therefore there is NO MUSCLE CONTRACTION. 👎
Hyperpolarization may be a REGULAR phenomenon in a DISEASED STATE ONLY.
REMEMBER THERE ARE MANY EXCITATORY NTs BUT ONLY FEW INHIBITORY ONES.
SO ONLY FEW INHIBITORY IMPULSES (IPSPs; inhibitory post-synaptic potentials) AT NM junction.
The question is general and so you can take the NT as an excitatory one;
its not framed specifically to test the knowledge of effect of an inhibitory NT at NM junction.
Option 4: Hypopolarization; there's no such thing as hypopolarization.
Option 1 is the bandicoot. Kill it!
Now Im tired
😴 and hope I was of some help
😱 else I know some Guru Ghantals "The Popats".
😎
Mayank.
PS Most of the above text is guaranteed, the rest is my evil thinking... *Shoo Mayankie shoo* -shrugs-