- Joined
- Jan 30, 2009
- Messages
- 4,218
- Reaction score
- 14
- Points
- 4,621


Personally, I think grading on a curve is not right. If 60% of the class understands the material well enough to get an A on an exam, then either the exam was too easy, or the professor teaches the material very well. It's one thing to have an adjusted grading scale (as was the case in classes like advanced organic at my school, where on the first test, the highest score was like 50%) so it's reasonable not to fail if you do the work, but grading on a curve doesn't exactly foster students helping each other out.
Personally, I think grading on a curve is not right. If 60% of the class understands the material well enough to get an A on an exam, then either the exam was too easy, or the professor teaches the material very well. It's one thing to have an adjusted grading scale (as was the case in classes like advanced organic at my school, where on the first test, the highest score was like 50%) so it's reasonable not to fail if you do the work, but grading on a curve doesn't exactly foster students helping each other out.
there can be only A
I agree. Then again I am in a class right now that has no curve and the class average is at 65%. I am at about 80%. The professor said he is thinking about doing a curve since everyone is so low. I this case I think it is necessary.
I dunno how other schools do it but when a prof around here says the class is curved they basically just adjust the scale so that the curve can only help you. They usually aim for 20%A, 30%B, etc but if 25% have A but everyone else is failing, they'll let all 25% keep their As and just bring everyone else up.
It's not a true curve since it can't hurt you, only help
the class average for almost all my classes in undergrad is 65-.-🙄
I have a 104 average in my ochem class and asked the teacher if those 4 points could be carried over to ochem II average grade, he said no.
nice try thoughI resent that 😡 lol jk, but you are right his tests are out of 110%. It is really easy to get over a 100 in the class, but I like to think I am just smart 😀
Oh, I see. And most tests go up to 100%?
Exactly.
Does that mean you're smarter? Are you any smarter?
Well, it's ten better, isn't it? It's not 100%. You see, most blokes, you know, will be scoring up to 100%. You're on 100% here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up in your class. Where can you go from there? Where?
I don't know.
Nowhere. Exactly. What we do is, if we need that extra push over the cliff, you know what we do?
Put it up to 110%.
110%. Exactly. Ten more.
Why don't you just make 100% the perfect score and make 100% be the top number?
(pause)
This test goes to 110%.
Personally, I think grading on a curve is not right. If 60% of the class understands the material well enough to get an A on an exam, then either the exam was too easy, or the professor teaches the material very well. It's one thing to have an adjusted grading scale (as was the case in classes like advanced organic at my school, where on the first test, the highest score was like 50%) so it's reasonable not to fail if you do the work, but grading on a curve doesn't exactly foster students helping each other out.