Hey guys! this is an awesome thread! thanks to Ceiling for sticking around and contributing. I am currently an MS-3 in the Midwest and next year I will be applying for residency. Before coming to medical school, I knew I wanted to a CT Surgeon. Nonetheless, it wasn't until the summer after my MS-1 year where I was awarded the AATS Summer Intern Scholarship and worked in Congenital CT Surge, the field that I want to go into as well as AVRs, those are definitely neat. My current question is in regards to training. I know the number of I6 programs keep growing and some traditional fellowships have closed, like it occurred in North Carolina. Right now, I am split between applying to I6 or go the traditional Route or maybe a 4+3.
From my experience working with residents and fellows in both pathways, I have noticed that a lot of the traditional fellows and those who did 4+3 have better surgical skills, SICU knowledge, and are more confident in the OR and when it comes to pre-op and post-op patient management. I have also met some I6 residents who are great, but by far those who had the general surgery training seem superior. I also heard from one of the fellows that some programs are reluctant to interview I6 residents for Peds CT Surgery sub fellowship. This kind of has made me lean more towards to 4+3 programs or the 5 yr general surgery + 2-3 CT fellowship. So for Ceiling, what is your view/opinion? And for everyone else in the field, what is the current word "in the street" about the training? I just really want to have the best medical training, as well as surgical skills and knowledge possible so that I can be the best! Thanks guys