Grant Writing

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I'm hoping to submit an NIH grant soon and am in the stage of waiting to get all of the supplementary materials that I need (namely, letters of support). Fun fun.
 
Many, many thanks for starting this thread. Applied for (and was awarded) a small in-house grant during my Master's program; will soon be looking at applying for larger ones for a work-related project.
 
Best advice I can give is to submit multiple redundant applications. Remember that these are not papers. Self-plagiarize like crazy, copy and paste whole sections from one application to another. Its a lot easier to change the format and submit the same grant to 3-4 different sources than to keep rewriting new ones. If you are in a position where you "really" should be getting NIH/NSF grants, you can always submit elsewhere concurrent with the second submission. Persistence pays off.

The new NIH scoring system is a train wreck, particularly in combination with the current funding situation. They are encouraging reviewers to use the whole scale and all it takes is one person listening and you are basically out of the running (even if they think your application should be funded!). Unfortunately it turns it into a bit of a quantity (vs. quality) game. I know several faculty members with incredible track records (including someone who was something like 22/23 with grant applications prior to the last few years) who are now struggling because of the submission limit and poor score reliability.
 
Probably prefer to have a daily root canal than do that for living....

If i didn't find publishing to be such a rewardless activity, I would be more into it. 🙂
 
Best advice I can give is to submit multiple redundant applications.

Absolutely.

The new NIH scoring system is a train wreck....

That's what I've heard...and one of the reasons I started this thread. I'm look at NIH, NIDDR, and a couple of other major funding sources...thankfully I am working with some very seasoned researchers so I can lean on them for a lot of my questions/concerns. Yay academia....most of the time. 😉
 
If i didn't find publishing to be such a rewardless activity, I would be more into it. 🙂

I've found it is much more palatable to do in collaboration, as being able to bounce ideas (and problems) off of other people has really helped me stay focused. It is still *a ton* of work, but I enjoy the change of pace.
 
Last edited:
Top