- Joined
- Jul 30, 2006
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 0
if the topic has been raised previously, please forgive me.
i went to med school, did my internship and am currently specializing in a field in europe. from the posts on this forum, (it naturally seems to be mainly visited by americans), i get the impression that there are vast differences when it comes to requirements an md must match when applying to a certain field/institution for a residency. it is not the existence of requirements itself that amazes me, its more the fact that specialties that are generally considered "easier" from a purely intellectual point of view, so to speak, seem to require the highest scores in the us. please dont take this the wrong way, im not looking for a flame war of any kind, im simpy stating a fact. i appreciate the dedication and hard work of a neurosurgeon, orthopod, general surgeon, etc., but looking at it objectively, we ARE talking manual labour here - no matter how you put it.
im convinced that the medical field in general, is not very intellectually challenging; it involves memorizing and following algorithms based on statistical data pretty much all the way. yet, there are certain specialties in which one is somewhat less prone to be a slave of predefined restrictions, notably psychiatry. the explanations is rather obvious: whenever were faced with a well defined problem - and this is by no means restricted to the world of medicine - were likely to have well defined solutions as well. a well defined solution always seems to involve tedious work, based on... algorithms. doesnt it discourage you guys, that all you have to do is memorize knowledge, and not have to contribue anything by yourselves when performing your job? ofcourse im well aware that "contribution" is just as ill defined as "hard" and "easy". but im not talking about "contribution" in the sense of excising a tumor in a 15 year old and knowing that youve given that person the opportunity to lead a normal life; neither am i talking about performing surgery on that 60 year old alcoholic that came in at 3 am with a gcs of 10 after a motor vehicle accident, and giving him a few more years on this planet. im talking about being able to utilize that gray matter of yours, and in fact create something.
again, i cannot stress it enough: this is NOT meant to be a nidus for a flame war/is not meant to be derogatory in any way. when i want be derogatory, and i can be, everyone will unmistakingly notice it ; )
i went to med school, did my internship and am currently specializing in a field in europe. from the posts on this forum, (it naturally seems to be mainly visited by americans), i get the impression that there are vast differences when it comes to requirements an md must match when applying to a certain field/institution for a residency. it is not the existence of requirements itself that amazes me, its more the fact that specialties that are generally considered "easier" from a purely intellectual point of view, so to speak, seem to require the highest scores in the us. please dont take this the wrong way, im not looking for a flame war of any kind, im simpy stating a fact. i appreciate the dedication and hard work of a neurosurgeon, orthopod, general surgeon, etc., but looking at it objectively, we ARE talking manual labour here - no matter how you put it.
im convinced that the medical field in general, is not very intellectually challenging; it involves memorizing and following algorithms based on statistical data pretty much all the way. yet, there are certain specialties in which one is somewhat less prone to be a slave of predefined restrictions, notably psychiatry. the explanations is rather obvious: whenever were faced with a well defined problem - and this is by no means restricted to the world of medicine - were likely to have well defined solutions as well. a well defined solution always seems to involve tedious work, based on... algorithms. doesnt it discourage you guys, that all you have to do is memorize knowledge, and not have to contribue anything by yourselves when performing your job? ofcourse im well aware that "contribution" is just as ill defined as "hard" and "easy". but im not talking about "contribution" in the sense of excising a tumor in a 15 year old and knowing that youve given that person the opportunity to lead a normal life; neither am i talking about performing surgery on that 60 year old alcoholic that came in at 3 am with a gcs of 10 after a motor vehicle accident, and giving him a few more years on this planet. im talking about being able to utilize that gray matter of yours, and in fact create something.
again, i cannot stress it enough: this is NOT meant to be a nidus for a flame war/is not meant to be derogatory in any way. when i want be derogatory, and i can be, everyone will unmistakingly notice it ; )