-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Guaranteed Interviews...
Started by gnu
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
I think Michigan will if you have certain numbers and came from certain schools.
This has been talked about quite a bit. Use your search function, boss.
I think UTSW does. Don't know of any others.
I think JAMP programs may also have such stipulation. For example, correct me if I am wrong, but Rutgers has a link with UMDNJ-RWJMS where if you go to rutgers for pre-med and maintain certain gpa and class ranking, you may get an interview there on the spot. I believe there is one fore drexel too.
If one hasn't applied to college yet but knows med school is something they would like to do in the future, then one should consider such JAMP programs.
If one hasn't applied to college yet but knows med school is something they would like to do in the future, then one should consider such JAMP programs.
University of Washington does for the WWAMI program. But if everyone is interviewing it doesn't really do much for you... You're still competing with the same crowd.
UTSW does
Does anyone know what the exact numbers are?
UW used to have a 3.5/30 rule, think they ditched it this year. 🙁
Ahh perhaps I'm mistaken then. I think they used to up the stats for the auto interview every year so they'd interview about the same number of applicants. Maybe they scrapped it.UW used to have a 3.5/30 rule, think they ditched it this year. 🙁
UTSW and Michigan give automatic invites and I heard Wash U also gives invites based on stats.
Does anyone know what the exact numbers are?
For OOS, it has to be at least higher than 3.6 and 34 MCAT. I originally applied to UTSW with 3.6/34 last June and didnt get an invite till the day after I found out my new MCAT score of 38 in October.
Indiana interviews all in-state applicants with a cumulative 3.2 and an MCAT with 25 or higher(no individual score under 6).
For OOS, it has to be at least higher than 3.6 and 34 MCAT. I originally applied to UTSW with 3.6/34 last June and didnt get an invite till the day after I found out my new MCAT score of 38 in October.
I got the auto-invite at UTSW with a 3.8/35
For OOS, it has to be at least higher than 3.6 and 34 MCAT. I originally applied to UTSW with 3.6/34 last June and didnt get an invite till the day after I found out my new MCAT score of 38 in October.
i wish i had known about this. ^^^
Indiana has a system for OOS too, although its much more strenuous. 3.8/32 - said an admissions rep. Probably because they are the only med school in Indiana.
i wish i had known about this too. ^^^
apparently, i applied to the wrong one of these two.
edit: looking back at my mdapps, i now understand why indiana didn't even let me fill out a secondary.
Last edited:
i wish i had known about this. ^^^
i wish i had known about this too. ^^^
apparently, i applied to the wrong one of these two.
edit: looking back at my mdapps, i now understand why indiana didn't even let me fill out a secondary.
I don't think they like us illionois-ans
I don't think they like us illionois-ans
Cant be worse than Californians
Indiana interviews all in-state applicants with a cumulative 3.2 and an MCAT with 25 or higher(no individual score under 6).
most public schools have similar systems for in-state applicants.
Last edited:
Sh**, I'm an OOS with 3.6/34. Should I even apply to UTSW?
Galveston, Houston, and San Antonio don't have cutoffs right?
Cant hurt since the TX apps are pretty cheap. Plus, maybe you have something that could help you that I didnt. For example, I never did research and they are a research minded school.
Iowa advised me that they have this system; their system last year was 10+ section score, and I recall the gpa cutoff being 3.7 or 3.75. Changed this past season (for the "automatic invites" to 10+ per mcat section and 3.8+ gpa; but there was some flexibility later in the interview season below these "automatic invite" figures.
oh wow.
does anyone here know what the "automatic" OOS cutoffs are for the following schools? not to say that they'd give interviews automatically, but any one know any specific cutoff numbers for the past year or so?
I know EVMS sends secondaries to all OOS who have sci gpa > 3.44, and MCAT > 29 or so.
LSU New Orleans
U Central del Caribe
Meharry
U of S. Alabama
U of Maryland
U of Toledo
U of Cincinnati
Tulane
Stony Brook
U of Connecticut
U of Minnesota
U of Utah
Wake Forest
Albany
Tufts
GWU
Michigan State
NYMC
U of Kentucky
Wayne State
EVMS
U of Vermont
Case Western
Boston
Howard
Jefferson
Loma Linda
Penn State
Rosalind Franklin
does anyone here know what the "automatic" OOS cutoffs are for the following schools? not to say that they'd give interviews automatically, but any one know any specific cutoff numbers for the past year or so?
I know EVMS sends secondaries to all OOS who have sci gpa > 3.44, and MCAT > 29 or so.
LSU New Orleans
U Central del Caribe
Meharry
U of S. Alabama
U of Maryland
U of Toledo
U of Cincinnati
Tulane
Stony Brook
U of Connecticut
U of Minnesota
U of Utah
Wake Forest
Albany
Tufts
GWU
Michigan State
NYMC
U of Kentucky
Wayne State
EVMS
U of Vermont
Case Western
Boston
Howard
Jefferson
Loma Linda
Penn State
Rosalind Franklin
U Mich does if you 1) 3.8+ 2) 38 + 3) go to a "reputable school."
U Mich does if you 1) 3.8+ 2) 38 + 3) go to a "reputable school."
So if you are below these numbers as an OOS, you shouldn't even apply? I find that hard to believe.
So if you are below these numbers as an OOS, you shouldn't even apply? I find that hard to believe.
no it just means you dont get an automatic interview....
U. Utah.
There standard isn't just a GPA and MCAT cutoff, however. It's more convoluted--you need to be above average for their standard applicant pool in x out of 6 fields (like hours volunteering, physician shadowing, research...).
Keep in mind that it's not as "too good to be true" as you might think. In my experience, if you read the Utah thread, you see why...they end up interviewing many people who are far more qualified than those they accept...so why did they interview them? b/c their rubric told them to?
In that case, the rubric didn't account for things like commitment to practice in underserved parts of the state. I imagine the same will be true for any other schools that are the only one in their state.
There standard isn't just a GPA and MCAT cutoff, however. It's more convoluted--you need to be above average for their standard applicant pool in x out of 6 fields (like hours volunteering, physician shadowing, research...).
Keep in mind that it's not as "too good to be true" as you might think. In my experience, if you read the Utah thread, you see why...they end up interviewing many people who are far more qualified than those they accept...so why did they interview them? b/c their rubric told them to?
In that case, the rubric didn't account for things like commitment to practice in underserved parts of the state. I imagine the same will be true for any other schools that are the only one in their state.
George Mason University in Fairfax Virginia has a program with GW which is pretty sweet. Guaranteed Acceptance to the program if you apply during your sophmore year of college and keep a 3.6 or above GPA, you don't even have to take the MCAT. They also have another program with VCU which is similiar but you need something like a 24 or above on the MCAT.
http://prehealth.gmu.edu/earlymd/gwu.html
http://prehealth.gmu.edu/earlymd/gwu.html
Ahh perhaps I'm mistaken then. I think they used to up the stats for the auto interview every year so they'd interview about the same number of applicants. Maybe they scrapped it.
No, they're going to a more "holistic" approach, ostensibly to give people with lower numbers but great experience/research equal footing with the robots with high stats who would otherwise take up all the interview spots...
...honestly I think they just got flooded with 3.5/30's and didn't want to deal with the uni-dimensional candidates who they'd basically be wasting an interview on...