-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
Harvard HST vs. MSTP
Started by ponderingoption
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
HST is a normal 4 year program right, just like New Pathway except the curriculum is different.
MSTP is better than any 4 year program.
HST is probably the best non-MSTP program at preparing you for medical research, but by itself its still not the same as getting a full blown PhD.
MSTP is better than any 4 year program.
HST is probably the best non-MSTP program at preparing you for medical research, but by itself its still not the same as getting a full blown PhD.
Thank you for the first serious response.
LOL
-The reason I am laughing is that while I was interviewing for HST, I heard some tool of a candidate was singing an ARIA during the tour portion of the interview as to try to impress her tour guide members.
-I'm kinda glad I didn't get in as I'd have to deal with shiit like that.
Come on guys, let's lighten up. I've experienced much more frightening sounds in Yale's libraries than a little song, and the "tool of a candidate" is really nice.
In any and every group you have people you may not want to associate with, but I've been really impressed with the people in the HST program--from friends to people I've met on the interview trail. However, I have been really surprised with how many of them turned down Md/PhD programs to go straight-HST. I met two who were turning down Cornell/Rock/SKI last weekend and know of two others (graduated in '01 and '02) who have turned down Duke and Baylor MSTPs. I thought it was crazy, but if you think you can get what you want out of a four year program, why take the extra 3-5 years. You can pay back the debt in that time? It's not my choice, but I can try to see why some might choose it. However, I cannot understand why someone would do the HST-PhD if they did not get full-funding. Paying for the four years+taking 7-9yrs for the education does not necessarily seem like the wisest option, but who knows! Cheers
In any and every group you have people you may not want to associate with, but I've been really impressed with the people in the HST program--from friends to people I've met on the interview trail. However, I have been really surprised with how many of them turned down Md/PhD programs to go straight-HST. I met two who were turning down Cornell/Rock/SKI last weekend and know of two others (graduated in '01 and '02) who have turned down Duke and Baylor MSTPs. I thought it was crazy, but if you think you can get what you want out of a four year program, why take the extra 3-5 years. You can pay back the debt in that time? It's not my choice, but I can try to see why some might choose it. However, I cannot understand why someone would do the HST-PhD if they did not get full-funding. Paying for the four years+taking 7-9yrs for the education does not necessarily seem like the wisest option, but who knows! Cheers
