- Joined
- Sep 16, 2010
- Messages
- 1,295
- Reaction score
- 2,174
Completely agree with Ectopic. I've worked in CMG, quasi-SDG, SDG, and hospital employed gigs. The most toxic setup, by far, is the CMG. Begin rant:
When somebody 1000 miles away is ultimately in charge of things like your EDs staffing levels and determining how the midlevels will function, it's much easier for decisions to be made the favor profit over patients.
They have one revenue stream: you. Their continual goal is to find ways to maximize it. The most aggressive billing I've ever seen, by far, was with the CMG.
As mentioned, the CMG is somewhat shielded from the public eye since most to realize they even exist. As such, they're less of a target from the constant barrage of crap and complaints their docs on the front lines deal with. They're happy to let their docs get hammered for things the individual doc of course has no control over.
If there's a lawsuit, the CMG is almost never named and they know it. So again, their C-suite folks have far less reason to care about the conditions on the front line and they have x number of suits written into the bottom line (which again, you create for them). If you work for a hospital you're all on the same team so you can be less exposed. SDGs fall in the middle.
With a CMG it's often not a doc but a bean counter driving these decisions. The framework by which CMGs make decisions is the most slippery of slopes.
If I had a CMG offer and a hospital employed offer that were at all similar, I'd pick hospital employed over CMG in a second.
When somebody 1000 miles away is ultimately in charge of things like your EDs staffing levels and determining how the midlevels will function, it's much easier for decisions to be made the favor profit over patients.
They have one revenue stream: you. Their continual goal is to find ways to maximize it. The most aggressive billing I've ever seen, by far, was with the CMG.
As mentioned, the CMG is somewhat shielded from the public eye since most to realize they even exist. As such, they're less of a target from the constant barrage of crap and complaints their docs on the front lines deal with. They're happy to let their docs get hammered for things the individual doc of course has no control over.
If there's a lawsuit, the CMG is almost never named and they know it. So again, their C-suite folks have far less reason to care about the conditions on the front line and they have x number of suits written into the bottom line (which again, you create for them). If you work for a hospital you're all on the same team so you can be less exposed. SDGs fall in the middle.
With a CMG it's often not a doc but a bean counter driving these decisions. The framework by which CMGs make decisions is the most slippery of slopes.
If I had a CMG offer and a hospital employed offer that were at all similar, I'd pick hospital employed over CMG in a second.