- Joined
- Sep 14, 2009
- Messages
- 5,027
- Reaction score
- 6,721
This article is like one giant hyperbole
They "bill" for a lot but MEDICARE reduces the charges to the agreed upon rate. You can bill for $1200 but Medicare will only approve $100 for the anesthesia and you are not permitted to balance bill the patient beyond their Co-Pay of the allowable Medicare charge.Am I reading this bill correctly? the ophthos get $1800 per case for these 15 min cataracts??
And the facility got $2800??
WTF?
The Medicare fee schedule for both cataract billable codes is around 680 and 860 bucks, and that’s including overhead. Not sure exactly why this article is quoting more.Am I reading this bill correctly? the ophthos get $1800 per case for these 15 min cataracts??
And the facility got $2800??
WTF?
$526 plus $130 from United Health care for the surgical portion. The facility fee is more profitable: $2377 plus $550=$2877Am I reading this bill correctly? the ophthos get $1800 per case for these 15 min cataracts??
And the facility got $2800??
WTF?
Am I reading this bill correctly? the ophthos get $1800 per case for these 15 min cataracts??
And the facility got $2800??
WTF?
This patient is a jerk. A small gash (probably from the drape) that healed in about three days warranting a police report and a medical board complaint ? That’s terrible
And the doctor yelling “don’t move” is standard in most cataract surgeries.
Patient is either a jerk or an idiot.
But we know the big idiot is the one who wrote and published this trash article on npr
This patient is a jerk. A small gash (probably from the drape) that healed in about three days warranting a police report and a medical board complaint ? That’s terrible
And the doctor yelling “don’t move” is standard in most cataract surgeries.
Arthur Kaplan is usually pretty good. But he’s a bit out of his expertise with surgical injuries.
So why not seek an experts opinion on this, like that of an independent ophthalmologist and anesthesiologist to weigh in on what happened? Instead they have this article full of non sense. Anyone who knows sees the journalist and patient as clowns. But the lay public is probably swayed to outrage over poor care and lying doctors.