Anyone else think its bogus our start up units are reimbursed based on the surgery itself?

Started by DrOwnage
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

DrOwnage

Attending
10+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Anyone think its annoying that our base units are reimbursed based on the reimbursement of the surgery itself? Like we get 13 units for a ACDF, but 4 units for a prone leg stab phlebectomy, or a prone back mass excision. 5 units for a BiV ICD in a guy with an EF of 10%. Do you think billing codes will ever change to fit the risk of the procedure vs just the surgical compensation?
 
Anyone think its annoying that our base units are reimbursed based on the reimbursement of the surgery itself? Like we get 13 units for a ACDF, but 4 units for a prone leg stab phlebectomy, or a prone back mass excision. 5 units for a BiV ICD in a guy with an EF of 10%. Do you think billing codes will ever change to fit the risk of the procedure vs just the surgical compensation?

Sure it isnt perfect but what else do you suggest? You dont agree with the specific scenarios? Extra units for ASA status, placement of blocks and advanced monitors...
 
Wondering if its always been that way or it was streamlined for a reason. Like why can't we have modifiers? Patient is septic, unstable, transfusion required, BMI >35-40. Some stuff takes more planning, logistics and definitely more work we don't get reimbursed for.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Anyone think its annoying that our base units are reimbursed based on the reimbursement of the surgery itself? Like we get 13 units for a ACDF, but 4 units for a prone leg stab phlebectomy, or a prone back mass excision. 5 units for a BiV ICD in a guy with an EF of 10%. Do you think billing codes will ever change to fit the risk of the procedure vs just the surgical compensation?
I think rather than change the base unit system, there just needs to be modifiers that actually pay fairly for the insane PITA things (like positioning) that can occur for simple cases, + the modifier for 3's and 4's needs to pay more as well.



Makes me wonder how much we got paid on the emergent'ish bleeding hemorrhoidectomy, Hgb 6, unknown malignancy, worsening constrictive pericarditis over the last couple years, and CRS insisting that it had to be prone....
 
I think rather than change the base unit system, there just needs to be modifiers that actually pay fairly for the insane PITA things (like positioning) that can occur for simple cases, + the modifier for 3's and 4's needs to pay more as well.



Makes me wonder how much we got paid on the emergent'ish bleeding hemorrhoidectomy, Hgb 6, unknown malignancy, worsening constrictive pericarditis over the last couple years, and CRS insisting that it had to be prone....

Probably around 13 units
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
And the modifiers schools also scale. Ease of positioning for a BMI of 35 is different than it is for 45 which is also different than it is for 55, etc.