Hellpits- absolute worst programs in radiation oncology

Started by RickyScott
Physicians and veterinarians: Turn your expertise into action! Explore CDC’s Epidemiology Elective Program and Epidemic Intelligence Service today.
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Browse articles Compare schools My application plan Read Interview Feedback
Practice for interviews Ask an Advisor
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
It should take less than one hour of internet sleuthing to come to a reasonable conclusion about the state of our specialty.

If you're saying they aren't capable of doing this.. then I guess a hellpit is rightfully theirs, although I think that is a very harsh punishment.
 
that’s strange
drowsy12 said:
there always have been and always will be people who choose to apply to non-competitive fields out of interest
Click to expand...
otherwise we’d have mass shortages in major IM specialties and path and others that are lower in competitiveness
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
medgator said:
Really? Not hard for a med student to look at spots offered now vs a decade or two ago and see that many more are offered now, along with RO being bottom of the barrel for SOAP 3 years in a row now.

Not normal things and certainly would require more investigation than just jumping in headfirst
Click to expand...
Picking a specialty is not like picking a mutual fund. I am sure you chose this field for more than it’s favorable predicted ROI.
 
Lamount said:
Picking a specialty is not like picking a mutual fund. I am sure you chose this field for more than it’s favorable predicted ROI.
Click to expand...
Sorry but job prospects matter. Are you telling me the competitiveness of the field in 1996 vs 2006/2016 vs 2023+ was because medical students weren't taking that into account?

No different than why dozens of ER spots are going unfilled as well lately
 
Last edited:
Lamount said:
Picking a specialty is not like picking a mutual fund. I am sure you chose this field for more than it’s favorable predicted ROI.
Click to expand...
For me, the most important factor in choosing a specialty would be completely avoiding the worst possible outcome ie unemployment. Medicine is filled with great specialties . The possibility of being unemployed, even if it is low, after all those years of medschool and training, should drop any field to the bottom. I dont know any field other than radonc that carries this risk. Other past oversubscribed specialties like CT surgery always had somethin to fall back on.
 
Last edited:
RickyScott said:
For me, the most important factor in choosing a specialty would be completely avoiding the worst possible outcome ie unemployment. The possibility of being unemployed, even if it is low, after all those years of medschool and training, should drop any field to the bottom. I dont know any field other than radonc that carries this risk. Other past oversubscribed specialties like CT surgery always had somethin to fall back on.
Click to expand...
Some would say "well you can find a job somewhere". Terrible criteria almost no other specialty has to resort to.

If i have to work in a certain city or metro/region, and i can't, unemployment it is. Geography is a big thing for most people
 
medgator said:
Some would say "well you can find a job somewhere". Terrible criteria almost no other specialty has to resort to.

If i have to work in a certain city or metro/region, and i can't, unemployment it is. Geography is a big thing for most people
Click to expand...
some doctors actually have spouse with their own careers and family preferences. It is almost like astro is winking and pushing radoncs to marry stay at home spouses while hosting "women who curie" presentations and paying lip service to "burnout"
 
Last edited:
The entire reason rad onc became a competitive specialty was the Salary : Demand : Lifestyle triune boon that occurred in the early to mid 00s.

Yes. I'm a rad onc. I understand it is also a cool job, with a rewarding patient population, and has become less toxic/more precise within that same timeframe. But that is pretty much every other medical specialty as well. Those conditions are not unique to rad onc. It was the economic factors that drove the interest. You're deluding yourself if you disagree.

Salary is still decent, but dropping. [see: salary down 30% in past 17 years, while inflation up 60% over past 21 years. Calculate that loss of purchasing power and your head will explode])
Demand is shaky, but bottom hasn't fallen out. Lots of boomer docs dropped out during COVID. Academic expansion creating new (but worse) jobs, etc... Lots of geographic restriction, but jobs are available out there.
Lifestyle is still top notch for a US physician.

Put it all together and the current picture isn't terrible (yet). I can see why people are still going into this field. Projecting anything 5 years out is nearly impossible. I don't forecast a rosy future, but who knows.

My 2 cents is, and I've been saying this for probably 4-5-years so take with multiple grains of salt:
The current picture isn't as bad as many here make it out to be.
The future picture is worse than many here have suggested.

I would strongly avoid if I were a 3rdor 4th year med student who needs to make a 30-35 year career decision. But I also could be completely wrong and a deus ex machina could be coming.

EDIT: To be fair, if I were a 3rd or 4th year undergrad making a 40 year career decision, I'd STRONGLY(!) avoid medicine altogether. It's a ****ing **** show at this point.
 
Last edited:
Unless you a) love it and will make any sacrifice necessary to be in it b) plan on being an academic wage slave or c) can't wait to move to rural america (and if unacceptable to family, get a pilots license)...

DO. NOT. CHOOSE. THIS. FIELD.

Use the AVOID technique, same as with gel.
 
The answer is somewhere between "everything is fine" and "If you are a US MD who goes to the wrong residency program as per my view I will immediately blacklist you for having horrible judgment". Not everything has to be an extreme. Focus the anger and resentment for where it SHOULD be, which is the people who run 'hellpits'.

Those who blame the students.... IDK man, that just sucks.
 
evilbooyaa said:
The answer is somewhere between "everything is fine" and "If you are a US MD who goes to the wrong residency program as per my view I will immediately blacklist you for having horrible judgment". Not everything has to be an extreme. Focus the anger and resentment for where it SHOULD be, which is the people who run 'hellpits'.

Those who blame the students.... IDK man, that just sucks.
Click to expand...

I wish I could love this 10 times. There was a genuine mainstream effort to make SOAPing culturally unacceptable in our field, but that effort is now dead. Very few people still care. I am one of them.

I love that you care, but you are causing real harm. The med students are interested in the genuine issues of this field but they are confused because there is so much hyperbole and drama online.

If someone thoroughly investigates RO and still decides to apply, they are smart, not dumb. There is still a handful of exceptional trainees that love this field and choose it voluntarily despite the uncertainty. They will be good radiation oncologists and we want these people in the field. The median number of applications sent by med students has been cut in half over the last few years. They are being discerning and acting more rational than most of our leaders. You couldn't pick a worse group to direct your totally valid anger.

If you instead go online (and out IRL) and give clear information, trash the hellpits for all the valid reasons, emphasize the workforce issues, ASTROs dishonest approach to controversial issues, etc etc.. they will totally listen to you. It could help, in theory. What is happening now is definitely not helping. It gives validity to the bad leaders that tell everyone to disregard all criticism because it comes from "misanthropes".

They are way smarter than the boomers give them credit for and the internet is an important resource for them. Use it wisely.
 
medgator said:
Sorry but job prospects matter. Are you telling me the competitiveness of the field in 1996 vs 2006/2016 vs 2023+ was because medical students weren't taking that into account?

No different than why dozens of ER spots are going unfilled as well lately
Click to expand...
No... but I am telling you that, knowing what I know, I would do it again... today. It's one thing to argue that the job market should matter in the choice of specialty, it's another to imply that it is ALL that matters.

Would I have more job prospects if I went into med/onc, a better lifestyle with derm, make more money with NSG? Sure. But putting in the order set for a chemo regimen doesn't excite me, and I don't want to look at gross rashes or be hovering over a bovie, smelling burnt flesh everyday.

Our job is a lot of fun and very rewarding. There are bright med students with their eyes wide open who still want to go into rad onc. Pretending this isn't the case is no better than pretending their isn't an oversupply problem.
 
RickyScott said:
For me, the most important factor in choosing a specialty would be completely avoiding the worst possible outcome ie unemployment. Medicine is filled with great specialties . The possibility of being unemployed, even if it is low, after all those years of medschool and training, should drop any field to the bottom. I dont know any field other than radonc that carries this risk. Other past oversubscribed specialties like CT surgery always had somethin to fall back on.
Click to expand...
Do you know any rad oncs who CAN'T get a job (not asking tongue and cheek)?

We are all in our little microcosms... but I just haven't seen that. Things were definitely slow during COVID, but these days, our residents usually have multiple offers. Not to say that there aren't geographic constraints that you wouldn't see in many other specialities, but in my (albeit limited) experience, "unemployment" isn't a concern.
 
Lamount said:
Do you know any rad oncs who CAN'T get a job (not asking tongue and cheek)?

We are all in our little microcosms... but I just haven't seen that. Things were definitely slow during COVID, but these days, our residents usually have multiple offers. Not to say that there aren't geographic constraints that you wouldn't see in many other specialities, but in my (albeit limited) experience, "unemployment" isn't a concern.
Click to expand...
I know of radoncs who lost their job/center closed who were forced to take a job hundreds of miles from kids/spouse and only see their family several times per month. This is a total disaster as far as I am concerned and encourages a malignant workplace. You can really make a docs life hell with this hanging over their head.


There are jobs presently available somewhere for everyone, but I think it is entirely possible that some radoncs will face sustained unemployment in the next 10 yrs. We may debate the likelihood of this risk, but it simply doesn’t exist for others specialties.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Lamount said:
Do you know any rad oncs who CAN'T get a job (not asking tongue and cheek)?

We are all in our little microcosms... but I just haven't seen that. Things were definitely slow during COVID, but these days, our residents usually have multiple offers. Not to say that there aren't geographic constraints that you wouldn't see in many other specialities, but in my (albeit limited) experience, "unemployment" isn't a concern.
Click to expand...
Why is “getting a job” the only criteria that matters? I know of radoncs who aren’t able to work in the geographic area they want to be in, even after being in practice for several years. And even more who are in their preferred geographic area yet are unhappy in satellite gigs.
 
Doctorer said:
Why is “getting a job” the only criteria that matters? I know of radoncs who aren’t able to work in the geographic area they want to be in, even after being in practice for several years. And even more who are in their preferred geographic area yet are unhappy in satellite gigs.
Click to expand...

I agree, but the comment was directly in response to the concept of unemployment proper.
 
I sent out my CV to about 5 places recently. No license issues or red flags. Stable employment history. Heard nothing back. There are jobs available but at the end of the day we still have amongst the worst job prospects in all of medicine. Keep in mind that in most other medical specialties one can find a job in a few weeks. Especially if you use rad onc style “geographically flexible” metric. But in rad onc to finding a new position becomes a year long odyssey and we are told this is fine and normal.
 
fiji128 said:
I sent out my CV to about 5 places recently. No license issues or red flags. Stable employment history. Heard nothing back. There are jobs available but at the end of the day we still have amongst the worst job prospects in all of medicine. Keep in mind that in most other medical specialties one can find a job in a few weeks. Especially if you use rad onc style “geographically flexible” metric. But in rad onc to finding a new position becomes a year long odyssey and we are told this is fine and normal.
Click to expand...

For med students choosing a specialty with high demand and low supply; looking for a job might be like.....

1696135252765.jpeg



Those choosing rad onc will find "a" job... but might find themselves like....


1696135294649.jpeg
 
new grads are being offered average 320k, i would assume >80% of them found those jobs in undesirable areas according to a new report I recently came across ,if that’s not alarming I don’t know what to say.
Its very sad seeing fam med new grads signing contracts for >300k left and right while our new grads are struggling to even find a job in a decent place.
 
Last edited:
sam1234567 said:
new grads are being offered average 320k, i would assume >80% of them found those jobs in undesirable areas according to a new report I recently came across ,if that’s not alarming I don’t know what to say.
Its very sad seeing fam med new grads signing contracts for >300k left and right while our new grads are struggling to even find a job in a decent place.
Click to expand...
Supply and demand
 
sam1234567 said:
new grads are being offered average 320k, i would assume >80% of them found those jobs in undesirable areas according to a new report I recently came across ,if that’s not alarming I don’t know what to say.
Its very sad seeing fam med new grads signing contracts for >300k left and right while our new grads are struggling to even find a job in a decent place.
Click to expand...
I think radonc new grads may have such Low expectations that they are “elated” and “satisfied” when they find any job.
 
I'd just like to offer that UC Davis should be added to the 'hellpit' category of programs. The UC Davis chair, Dr. Richard Valicenti, spoke at Q&A during the workforce talk at ASTRO and suggested that we continue to train 'for the future we want' and that an undersupply will cause rural patients to suffer.

Newflash, Dick: we're making more residents than ever and people still don't want rural jobs. By saying "train more", what you're really saying is "let's make sure people are forced into jobs they don't want because they won't have other options." That's a ****ty thing to say to trainees, and med students know it.

Here's the answer to solving rural access (for all of medicine, not just RO): pay more.

That's it.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
They do pay more. Way way moar. I'm #'ing it with 10 on treatment working (and I use that term lightly) about 3 and half days or so a week.

You just have to live in the middle of nowhere (2+ hours from major metro) to get these types of gigs. Negotiate hard. There are plenty of them from what I see..

"But I don't want to live in the middle of nowhere"

Snl GIF by Saturday Night Live
 
GapCalc said:
I'd just like to offer that UC Davis should be added to the 'hellpit' category of programs. The UC Davis chair, Dr. Richard Valicenti, spoke at Q&A during the workforce talk at ASTRO and suggested that we continue to train 'for the future we want' and that an undersupply will cause rural patients to suffer.

Newflash, Dick: we're making more residents than ever and people still don't want rural jobs. By saying "train more", what you're really saying is "let's make sure people are forced into jobs they don't want because they won't have other options." That's a ****ty thing to say to trainees, and med students know it.

Here's the answer to solving rural access (for all of medicine, not just RO): pay more.

That's it.
Click to expand...
Problem with many rural jobs in this field is that they have few pts on beam, not just their location. Valicenti had a very non malignant rep at Jeff (not)
 
Last edited:
sirspamalot said:
Its true, rural locations don't typically have 20, or even if they're lucky, 15 on treatment. My experience ranges from 3 to 24 average 12 ? maybe? and as of today its half that... with a handful starting.

Lots of free time to.... comment on SDN lol.
Click to expand...
I am sure there are rural places that pay well, but there are certainly some that dont (they feel salary should reflect the 7 pts on beam) and those are the ones that don’t fill and are held up as a evidence of a shortage!

 
GapCalc said:
I'd just like to offer that UC Davis should be added to the 'hellpit' category of programs. The UC Davis chair, Dr. Richard Valicenti, spoke at Q&A during the workforce talk at ASTRO and suggested that we continue to train 'for the future we want' and that an undersupply will cause rural patients to suffer.

Newflash, Dick: we're making more residents than ever and people still don't want rural jobs. By saying "train more", what you're really saying is "let's make sure people are forced into jobs they don't want because they won't have other options." That's a ****ty thing to say to trainees, and med students know it.

Here's the answer to solving rural access (for all of medicine, not just RO): pay more.

That's it.
Click to expand...
That was… a vigorous discussion
I thought Pinnix did a great job shooting down that argument, though
 
Mandelin Rain said:
When someone in a leadership position unironically and publicly states that "we should train for the future we want," you should immediately realize just how ****ed we all are.
Click to expand...
pikachu said:
That was… a vigorous discussion
I thought Pinnix did a great job shooting down that argument, though
Click to expand...

Agree. I didn't catch who that was, but at best that person is grossly misguided by their COI and at worse they are a horrible person.

I'd strongly suggest everyone watch the session if possible. If you haven't been following closely, it was an excellent summary of the important points and it was all framed really well.

It is so shameful that 75% of the SOAPs are people who don't match in their desired, other field. We are a predatory field in the SOAP.

Chirag should be applauded for getting us here and putting this message out so clearly. Programs need to close or contract.

So who will close? Maybe Sameer can step up. Michalski? (lol) Vapiwala? Pinnix? What about in Cleveland where there are two good programs? Spratt?

In my opinion, this is the best chance for ASTRO insiders to step up and act selflessly in line with their words.
 
NotMattSpraker said:
Agree. I didn't catch who that was, but at best that person is grossly misguided by their COI and at worse they are a horrible person.

I'd strongly suggest everyone watch the session if possible. If you haven't been following closely, it was an excellent summary of the important points and it was all framed really well.

It is so shameful that 75% of the SOAPs are people who don't match in their desired, other field. We are a predatory field in the SOAP.

Chirag should be applauded for getting us here and putting this message out so clearly. Programs need to close or contract.

So who will close? Maybe Sameer can step up. Michalski? (lol) Vapiwala? Pinnix? What about in Cleveland where there are two good programs? Spratt?

In my opinion, this is the best chance for ASTRO insiders to step up and act selflessly in line with their words.
Click to expand...
We've previously discussed the irony of the "best" programs being the ones to contract and the "worst" being least likely.

Just wanted to point out that Pinnix @ MDACC has already taken the step of contraction, and in Cleveland from what I recall Tendulkar @ Cleveland Clinic did as well.
 
NotMattSpraker said:
Agree. I didn't catch who that was, but at best that person is grossly misguided by their COI and at worse they are a horrible person.

I'd strongly suggest everyone watch the session if possible. If you haven't been following closely, it was an excellent summary of the important points and it was all framed really well.

It is so shameful that 75% of the SOAPs are people who don't match in their desired, other field. We are a predatory field in the SOAP.

Chirag should be applauded for getting us here and putting this message out so clearly. Programs need to close or contract.

So who will close? Maybe Sameer can step up. Michalski? (lol) Vapiwala? Pinnix? What about in Cleveland where there are two good programs? Spratt?

In my opinion, this is the best chance for ASTRO insiders to step up and act selflessly in line with their words.
Click to expand...

CaesarRO said:
We've previously discussed the irony of the "best" programs being the ones to contract and the "worst" being least likely.

Just wanted to point out that Pinnix @ MDACC has already taken the step of contraction, and in Cleveland from what I recall Tendulkar @ Cleveland Clinic did as well.
Click to expand...
Should be the LIJ/Louis potters of the field, also places like wvu, tenn, Mississippi etc but we all know that will never happen
 
CaesarRO said:
We've previously discussed the irony of the "best" programs being the ones to contract and the "worst" being least likely.

Just wanted to point out that Pinnix @ MDACC has already taken the step of contraction, and in Cleveland from what I recall Tendulkar @ Cleveland Clinic did as well.
Click to expand...

It should be but it wont be, that is really what I am saying. R-spots and SOAPs are up this year. This is despite the local (small) efforts of Pinnix and Tendulkar.

If they want to be heroic, they should do the very selfless move of closing their programs... even though we all know that would probably be a net negative for medical education in this field. If they don't, of course they personally should not be blamed. The people in that session have already done more than their fair share on this issue.

We just happen to have an adequate supply of good medical education and a critical shortage of selfless leaders.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
pikachu said:
Programs here and there randomly going down a spot or two is not going to solve the problem. As people on here have astutely pointed out in the past this is a classic problem of collective action and will require concerted effort across the specialty to address it.
Click to expand...
One could also speculate that the programs most in need of closing are the ones least likely to do so. Again, a couple programs falling on their swords will not do the trick here.
 
pikachu said:
One could also speculate that the programs most in need of closing are the ones least likely to do so. Again, a couple programs falling on their swords will not do the trick here.
Click to expand...

Why do people fall on swords though?

We know all this already. I don't disagree with what you are saying, but what do you suggest we do? Spots and SOAPS are up.
 
GapCalc said:
I'd just like to offer that UC Davis should be added to the 'hellpit' category of programs. The UC Davis chair, Dr. Richard Valicenti, spoke at Q&A during the workforce talk at ASTRO and suggested that we continue to train 'for the future we want' and that an undersupply will cause rural patients to suffer.

Newflash, Dick: we're making more residents than ever and people still don't want rural jobs. By saying "train more", what you're really saying is "let's make sure people are forced into jobs they don't want because they won't have other options." That's a ****ty thing to say to trainees, and med students know it.

Here's the answer to solving rural access (for all of medicine, not just RO): pay more.

That's it.
Click to expand...

So useless and yet destructive at the same time. The reality we don't like needs to be ignored and we only need to manifest the reality we want. With vision like this I can't imagine why US grad med students are choosing to stay away.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

RadOncMegatron
Radiation Oncology Researcher Tier List
Replies
23
Views
4K
evilbooyaa
evilbooyaa
W
texas oncology radiation symptom management book
Replies
5
Views
2K
metallica81788
metallica81788
Gfunk6
The problems facing radiation oncology
Replies
30
Views
7K
evilbooyaa
evilbooyaa
D
Radiation oncology vs. radiation medicine
Replies
9
Views
3K
joeshmo27
J
D
Benzos in Radiation Oncology
Replies
13
Views
3K
evilbooyaa
evilbooyaa