- Joined
- Mar 22, 2007
- Messages
- 92
- Reaction score
- 1
am i the only one?? i've been trying to figure out nameing polyatomic atoms, and its going pretty bad.
am i the only one?? i've been trying to figure out nameing polyatomic atoms, and its going pretty bad.
Of course it is, there are no polyatomic atoms.am i the only one?? i've been trying to figure out nameing polyatomic atoms, and its going pretty bad.
Just go one step at a time. For example, if you need to convert volume of gas into micrograms of gas, convert volume to moles first; then moles to grams; then grams to micrograms. The more detailed steps you take, the less likely you are to make a mistake.not even that, I am taking intro. I got a 2 on my AP chem test so I decided to step back one class. I did good on the short essays and short answers and all the gas laws but I did horrible on the math part. I have never been good in conversions. I studied them and I got them but when I saw them on the test I forgot everything.
not even that, I am taking intro. I got a 2 on my AP chem test so I decided to step back one class. I did good on the short essays and short answers and all the gas laws but I did horrible on the math part. I have never been good in conversions. I studied them and I got them but when I saw them on the test I forgot everything.
am i the only one?? i've been trying to figure out nameing polyatomic atoms, and its going pretty bad.
http://www.chemtutor.com/numbr.htm#da
http://chemistry.alanearhart.org/Tutorials/DimAnal/
http://www.alysion.org/dimensional/fun.htm
Those 3 links look like they have some good tutorials on dimensional analysis, which is what conversions (or equivalence statements) fall under. You really do need to be good at basic algebra to do well in chem since some equations, such as the ideal gas law (PV=nRT), require you to divide certain parts of the equation to isolate the variable you want to find when given the information for the rest of the variables.
The meat of intro chem and gen chem 1 was significant figures/digits and dimensional analysis...I'd focus on those the most if you're having trouble doing conversions.
I love Flash cards. I took chem 1 in the summer and my group realized that we had to memorize the polyatomics 30 minutes before the test, and i did. I didnt do half bad.I would have to disagree on flash cards...
I've never liked flash cards because they are not a good use of time. You could use the time spent on making the flash cards by instead memorizing something in your head by repeating it over and over. Flash cards breed bad study habits.
I learned this in high school, and I hope I don't screw it up. No one else in my classes was taught this, wierd.
In the attached image all red elements have XO3 compositions, all that are lime are XO4 compositions. I know its a small tip, but it will save you a lot of time trying to just purely memorize. If this theory is wrong, aka I forgot it from probably 6 or 7 years ago, let me know so I can edit this.
Not really, you memorize things while you write them down on flash cards. That's why I always transcribe things when I study material that's very dense (think cell bio, microbio) - I memorize more by reading once/writing simultaneously than I do by reading 3 times.I would have to disagree on flash cards...
I've never liked flash cards because they are not a good use of time. You could use the time spent on making the flash cards by instead memorizing something in your head by repeating it over and over. Flash cards breed bad study habits.
how does it work? what does XO4 stand for?
Not really, you memorize things while you write them down on flash cards. That's why I always transcribe things when I study material that's very dense (think cell bio, microbio) - I memorize more by reading once/writing simultaneously than I do by reading 3 times.
sorry I can't help I just got a 71% on my first chemistry test so I am down.....
Not really, you memorize things while you write them down on flash cards. That's why I always transcribe things when I study material that's very dense (think cell bio, microbio) - I memorize more by reading once/writing simultaneously than I do by reading 3 times.
I agree with this. For my bio and chem classes, I take notes in a notebook while I read (occasionally highlight too) and it helps a lot. However, I usually just read over them once or twice before the test, or not at all. The act of writing something solidifies it and helps you remember it. Flash cards aren't necessary if you take bullet-point style notes, though.
Actually I do this too, but writing down concepts and things as you read them is very different from writing out flash cards IMO. With flash cards, you're just associating a word or phrase with a specific definition; nothing else. On the other hand, taking notes while reading a chapter, you're putting concepts/ideas/terms together in a logical flow as you read.
What was the average?
Because if you hit near or above average and are still aiming for the A you aren't tanked yet.
And if it makes you feel any better I've screwed up many a test...
(imagine reading 1-1=1 instead of 1-1=0 on a differential equations test....and it costing you 22% on its own)
Better yet if it's gen chem and a big class you can be sure the average won't get any better.
i did the flash cards as review before a test, but for memorizing i used to bump into a lot of them while doing chem problems and tried to see if i remembered what their names were. eventually naming them became natural, mainly because i am a superhuman geniusam i the only one?? i've been trying to figure out nameing polyatomic atoms, and its going pretty bad.
we had 3 "A"s, 5 "B"s, 7 "C"s, 12 "D"s, and 5 "F"s.
She did not exactly tell us the average.
I don't mean to hijack this thread, but i'm havin the same problem, but with Stoichiometric Mass Calculations. I am only studying hard, not smart. I studied and tried to solve the practice problems in the book, but i'm still having trouble. I studied the material for 8 hours yesterday, but the gain was not worth the time spent. Any suggestions?
So your grade was borderling C/D. 15 people had higher than you, 17 people had lower, if you're right in the middle. Sounds about average, so it depends on what she curves to.
The only thing I can suggest is to think of it as a puzzle. (This is a lot easier to show then tell, I'll try though.) you know what you start with, and you know what you need to end with. Look at the ratios that you have (moles of atom per grams of atom, moles of one element per the other element, moles per gram, etc) and try to figure out how they fit together. This may be easier if you write the ratios on 3x5 cards and you can turn them over to try and fit them together. Once you see how they go together a few times, then you can try to think of them as puzzle pieces inside your head.
(edited to say - the whole point of this is to understand how it WORKS, not how to do it, as well as to give you a different way of looking at it.)
She does not curve it. She said we can drop one at the end of the semester but we don't get curves unless more then half of the class fails it.