- Joined
- Jun 25, 2018
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 4
Last edited:
Definitely post your school list if you’re comfortable sharing.
Based on what you posted though, I’d guess the 17 PAT is a red flag to schools. Maybe retake if you have the time/money.
School List:
-Rutgers
-Maryland
-NYU
-Touro
-Columbia
-UPenn
-Harvard
-UOP
-WesternU Pomona
-USC
-UCLA
-UCSF
-Temple
-LECOM
-University of Michigan
**Before applying, I made sure that my stats/pre-reqs, shadowing hours were reasonable for these schools. Based on SDN and facebook, applicants with similar or lower stats than me have received interviews and acceptances from all of these schools.**
what were your other section scores?17 PAT is not a red flag
do not retake, please
what were your other section scores?
what is your state of residence?
In 2016 (most current data I could find) 78.7% of matriculating students had PAT of 19+. Many of the schools OP applied to have PAT averages of 20+. Maybe it’s not a red flag, but comparatively, the odds seem to be against them with a 17 PAT.17 PAT is not a red flag
do not retake, please
Thanks for the input! I did consider retaking the DAT after I took it due to the 17 PAT, but feared that I would maybe score lower TS or AA and did not want to take that risk, though I maybe should have taken that risk.In 2016 (most current data I could find) 78.7% of matriculating students had PAT of 19+. Many of the schools OP applied to have PAT averages of 20+. Maybe it’s not a red flag, but comparatively, the odds seem to be against them with a 17 PAT.
Congrats to everyone on their acceptances and sending patience to those still waiting!!!
I applied to 15 schools in late June with a 23AA, 25TS, 17PAT, 3.52sGPA, 3.62oGPA, and 3.55 BCP GPA from a good school with an upward trend, 500 hours of shadowing/volunteering, more hours in other dental-related activities, and a well-written personal statement (based on feedback I have received). Yet, I have received only 2 interview invitations, 3 rejections without interview, and nothing from the rest of the schools. I sent a letter of intent to my top choice back in November (was rejected), and sent letters of interest to my other top choices after the new year. I am trying to understand where I "went wrong" with my application this cycle and what about my application is putting schools off. Is it the 17 on the PAT, my one "C" in a pre-req class, or that I took some pre-reqs at a community college? Is my personal statement maybe not as well-written as I thought? I don't have any special talents or skills that make me stand out, is that maybe it? I know schools undergo a holistic review and that I can't expect loads of interviews just because I did well on the DAT, but I do feel that each component of my app is decently strong, so seeing applicants with lower stats than me with all these interviews is super discouraging. Hoping that one of the schools I did interview at recently works out, but in case it doesn't, would love some clarity before I reapply.
Sorry that this is a bit long. ^^ I just wanted to provide enough context to anyone willing to offer some insight. Thank you!!!
Thanks for the input! I did consider retaking the DAT after I took it due to the 17 PAT, but feared that I would maybe score lower TS or AA and did not want to take that risk, though I maybe should have taken that risk.
Thanks so much for your input and sharing your story! & congrats on matriculating! I can definitely understand that community college courses aren't viewed as favorably, but viewing them in context/holistically, I did even better in my upper division science courses at my 4-year school than I did taking my pre-reqs at a cc. I finished my degree a year early by starting some of these classes when I was a senior in high school. For example, I took gen chem I as a senior in high school...maybe there's a rule about pre-reqs being completed after high school? Not sure what to think about it all. It does only take one, so praying for it every second I get!
Same situation! In general, my coursework at a top ten state school was overall higher and I had a masters from that same school (unrelated field but with some 6000 and 7000 level science classes — and I was valedictorian in the program ♀️). I think there are simple things that just get you placed in the “other” pile and unfortunately I think CC courses are one of them for some schools. Not to say I think that’s right — my CC science classes were more challenging than my state university — but admissions committees are humans too, with biases and a need to quickly sort a large volume of applicants. With that said, I believe that if a school didn’t honor my path to dentistry, it probably wasn’t the best fit for me anyways. I’m extremely pleased with where I am now, so I have faith it will work out that way for you too!Thanks so much for your input and sharing your story! & congrats on matriculating! I can definitely understand that community college courses aren't viewed as favorably, but viewing them in context/holistically, I did even better in my upper division science courses at my 4-year school than I did taking my pre-reqs at a cc. I finished my degree a year early by starting some of these classes when I was a senior in high school. For example, I took gen chem I as a senior in high school...maybe there's a rule about pre-reqs being completed after high school? Not sure what to think about it all. It does only take one, so praying for it every second I get!
I remember on AADSAS you had to put in your DENTPIN somewhere so they could match your DAT test to your appPlease explain what “inputted” means 😕
I was just trying to be funny because I thought “inputted” wasn’t the correct way of using that word but google proved me wrongI remember on AADSAS you had to put in your DENTPIN somewhere so they could match your DAT test to your app
I think you may be interpreting the chart wrong. It's saying that out of all the applicants in 2018, 16% of them had a science GPA of 3.75+. Out of those that were enrolled to dental school 24.1% had a GPA of 3.75+. This shows that those being accepted had a higher GPA and it was a factor in admissions.There is an erroneous presumption that high stats is a guarantee to ds acceptance. The statistical evidence does not support this assumption. For 2018, out of 11928 applicants, 22 % of the applicants with a sci gpa of 3.75+ did not gain acceptance; similarly, ~26% of applicants with an AA DAT score of 21+ were also denied admission. These figures are much higher than previously seen in these 2 subgroups.
what a nightmare wow! nothing like that thankfullyomg what if you inputted your DENTPIN wrong
One of my friends was telling me this had happened to someone she knew!
I think you may be interpreting the chart wrong. It's saying that out of all the applicants in 2018, 16% of them had a science GPA of 3.75+. Out of those that were enrolled to dental school 24.1% had a GPA of 3.75+. This shows that those being accepted had a higher GPA and it was a factor in admissions.
Maybe I'm reading your post wrong, please correct me if that's the case.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using SDN mobile
Ah I totally see it now. Definitely missed those steps. Thanks for clarifying.Doc is interpreting the chart correctly. What he did was take 16% of applicants out of 11928 total applicants. Then he took 24.1% of enrollees from 6163 enrollees. That gives you 1908 applicants with a 3.75+ sGPA, and 1485 enrollees with 3.75+ sGPA. That means 78% of applicants with 3.75+ sGPA enrolled into dental school, or 22% got rejected.
Sooo did you find out what was wrong OP?
Sent from my iPhone using SDN