n=1 but at my institution we look at someone’s life experiences and give them bonus points for how hard their life has been. But we consider everything. If I’m going to pick a politically inflammatory example, I would give the white Christian heterosexual guy who grew up on food stamps more “suffering points” for lack of a better term than an URM student who had wealthy parents, tutors, private schooling, etc.
But it’s a subjective measure, and it would presumably differ among raters at my own institution.
I think giving generic bonuses to individuals based on race or nationality is a bad call anyway. At the same time, we need more URM physicians, and there are legitimate structural reasons those individuals tend to be less represented. So it all seems to come out in the wash if you just look at each individual’s life experiences. My medical school has been quite diverse long before recent political things were trendy.