How bad are B+s?

Started by imbackasd
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

imbackasd

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Just ended up this semester with 3 straight B+s in upper level classes like Biochemistry.

fucajshdjasnd really annoyed and mad at my self.
 
Last edited:
Just ended up this semester with 3 straight B+s in upper level classes like Biochemistry.

fucajshdjasnd really annoyed and mad at my self.

Avoid them as much as you can, but it's not the end of the world if you have a few B's. Get A's next semester.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I generally rate them as equivalent to a 3.3 GPA, somewhat better than C's and not quite as good as A's...

A B+ is a 3.3...a C is a 2.0. Big difference. At most schools a B+ is an 87-89%, which is definitely respectable. You should be happy your school gives B+s, because otherwise you'd have a B for an 89, which sucks.
 
Just ended up this semester with 3 straight B+s in upper level classes like Biochemistry.

fucajshdjasnd really annoyed and mad at my self.


my last quarter before applying I had two C's.

Of coarse one was in quantum chem
 
A B+ is a 3.3...a C is a 2.0. Big difference. At most schools a B+ is an 87-89%, which is definitely respectable. You should be happy your school gives B+s, because otherwise you'd have a B for an 89, which sucks.

Tell me about it. In my grad program my biostats course professor gave me a B for an 88. Not too happy but there was nothing I could do. Thankfully that was the only course with that grade assignment policy.
 
😴
A B+ is a 3.3...a C is a 2.0. Big difference. At most schools a B+ is an 87-89%, which is definitely respectable. You should be happy your school gives B+s, because otherwise you'd have a B for an 89, which sucks.

Story of my f-ing life